Imaging criteria across pivotal randomized controlled trials for late window thrombectomy patient selection.

CT CT angiography CT perfusion stroke

Journal

Journal of neurointerventional surgery
ISSN: 1759-8486
Titre abrégé: J Neurointerv Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517079

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 06 10 2020
revised: 29 10 2020
accepted: 30 10 2020
entrez: 26 11 2020
pubmed: 27 11 2020
medline: 27 11 2020
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The DAWN and DEFUSE-3 trials showed the benefit of endovascular treatment (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke patients presenting beyond 6 hours from last known well (LKW) and selected by perfusion imaging criteria. The ESCAPE NA1-trial selected patients based on non-contrast CT (NCCT) Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) and multiphase CT angiography (CTA) collateral status. This study compares baseline characteristics, workflow, and outcomes in the EVT arms of DAWN and DEFUSE-3 with late-window patients from the EVT-only arm of ESCAPE-NA1. Aggregate data on baseline characteristics, workflow, reperfusion quality, final infarct volume, and clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Score [mRS] at 90 days) in subjects enrolled in the DAWN and DEFUSE-3 EVT arms were compared with similar data from the ESCAPE-NA1 control arm (EVT-only arm) presenting beyond 6 hours from LKW using descriptive statistics. Baseline characteristics among late-window patients in the ESCAPE NA1 trial were similar to those in the DAWN and DEFUSE-3 EVT arms. Median time from LKW-to-puncture in subjects enrolled in the ESCAPE NA1 trial was 9 hrs (IQR: 7.5-11 hours) when compared with DAWN (n=107; 12.8 hours, IQR: 10.6-16.7 hours) and DEFUSE-3 (n=92; 11.5 hours, IQR: 9.2-12.8 hours). Median post-treatment infarct-volume was largest in the ESCAPE NA1-patients (47 mL [IQR: 19-146] vs median 8 mL [IQR: 0-48] in the DAWN group and 35 mL [IQR: 18-82] in DEFUSE-3), while % mRS 0-2 at 90 days were similar across the three trials (ESCAPE NA1: 50/111 [45%], DAWN: 52/107 [49%], DEFUSE-3: 41/92 [45%]). Patients enrolled beyond 6 hours from LKW in the ESCAPE-NA1 trial based on NCCT-ASPECTS and mCTA had similar clinical outcomes when compared with patients selected by perfusion imaging in the DAWN and DEFUSE-3 trials.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The DAWN and DEFUSE-3 trials showed the benefit of endovascular treatment (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke patients presenting beyond 6 hours from last known well (LKW) and selected by perfusion imaging criteria. The ESCAPE NA1-trial selected patients based on non-contrast CT (NCCT) Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) and multiphase CT angiography (CTA) collateral status. This study compares baseline characteristics, workflow, and outcomes in the EVT arms of DAWN and DEFUSE-3 with late-window patients from the EVT-only arm of ESCAPE-NA1.
METHODS METHODS
Aggregate data on baseline characteristics, workflow, reperfusion quality, final infarct volume, and clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Score [mRS] at 90 days) in subjects enrolled in the DAWN and DEFUSE-3 EVT arms were compared with similar data from the ESCAPE-NA1 control arm (EVT-only arm) presenting beyond 6 hours from LKW using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS RESULTS
Baseline characteristics among late-window patients in the ESCAPE NA1 trial were similar to those in the DAWN and DEFUSE-3 EVT arms. Median time from LKW-to-puncture in subjects enrolled in the ESCAPE NA1 trial was 9 hrs (IQR: 7.5-11 hours) when compared with DAWN (n=107; 12.8 hours, IQR: 10.6-16.7 hours) and DEFUSE-3 (n=92; 11.5 hours, IQR: 9.2-12.8 hours). Median post-treatment infarct-volume was largest in the ESCAPE NA1-patients (47 mL [IQR: 19-146] vs median 8 mL [IQR: 0-48] in the DAWN group and 35 mL [IQR: 18-82] in DEFUSE-3), while % mRS 0-2 at 90 days were similar across the three trials (ESCAPE NA1: 50/111 [45%], DAWN: 52/107 [49%], DEFUSE-3: 41/92 [45%]).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Patients enrolled beyond 6 hours from LKW in the ESCAPE-NA1 trial based on NCCT-ASPECTS and mCTA had similar clinical outcomes when compared with patients selected by perfusion imaging in the DAWN and DEFUSE-3 trials.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33239306
pii: neurintsurg-2020-016902
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016902
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: BM holds a patent on systems of triage in acute stroke and stock ownership in Circle Neurovascular Inc. MG is a consultant for Medtronic, Stryker, Microvention, GE Healthcare, and Mentice. MH reports grants from CIHR during the conduct of the study, grants from Medtronic, and grants from NoNO Inc. outside the submitted work. In addition, he has a patent to US Patent office Number: 62/086,077 issued and licensed, and Director, Board of Circle Neurovascular, Director, Board of the Canadian Neuroscience Federation, and Director, Board of the Canadian Stroke Consortium.

Auteurs

Bijoy K Menon (BK)

Calgary Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Johanna Maria Ospel (JM)

Calgary Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Neuroradiology, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Ryan A McTaggart (RA)

Warren Alpert School of Medicine & Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Raul G Nogueira (RG)

Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Andrew M Demchuk (AM)

Calgary Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Alexandre Poppe (A)

Department of Neurology/ Neurosciences, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Jeremy L Rempel (JL)

Department of Radiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Charlotte Zerna (C)

Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Manish Joshi (M)

Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Mohammed A Almekhlafi (MA)

Calgary Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Thalia S Field (TS)

Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Dariush Dowlatshahi (D)

Neurology, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Brian Anthony van Adel (BA)

Clinical Neurological Sciences, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

Eric Sauvageau (E)

Lyerly Neurosurgery, Baptist Hospital, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.

Jason Tarpley (J)

Vascular Neurology, Providence Saint John's Health Center and The Pacific Neuroscience Institute, Torrance, California, USA.

Tiago Moreira (T)

Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Oh Young Bang (OY)

Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Don Heck (D)

Radiology, Forsyth Medical Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA.

Marios N Psychogios (MN)

Department of Neuroradiology, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Michael Tymianski (M)

NoNo Inc, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Michael D Hill (MD)

Calgary Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Mayank Goyal (M)

Calgary Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada mgoyal2412@gmail.com.
Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Classifications MeSH