Robot-assisted artificial urinary sphincter implantation.
Journal
Current opinion in urology
ISSN: 1473-6586
Titre abrégé: Curr Opin Urol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9200621
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2021
01 2021
Historique:
entrez:
26
11
2020
pubmed:
27
11
2020
medline:
26
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of the present manuscript was to provide an overview on the current state of robotic artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in male and female patients. Over the past few years, several series have been reported, with promising outcomes for the most part. This has contributed to expand the use of bladder neck AUS, especially in female patients, which was, until then, hampered by its perioperative morbidity. Robotic AUS has been developed to overcome the technical challenge of bladder neck implantation in female patients and in specific male subgroups, especially self-catheterizing neurological patients. All the series of robotic AUS implantation published in the past few years reported much lower rates of cuff erosion and AUS explantation than the historical open cohorts suggesting that the robotic approach might become the standard for female AUS implantation. This less morbid approach along with technological improvement of the AUS device may contribute to make it a more popular option in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency. There are much less data available on robotic bladder neck AUS implantation in male patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33239514
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000837
pii: 00042307-202101000-00003
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2-10Références
Biardeau X, Aharony S, the AUS Consensus Group, et al. Artificial urinary sphincter: report of the 2015 Consensus Conference: artificial urinary sphincter. Neurourol Urodyn 2016; 35:S8–S24.
Averbeck MA, Woodhouse C, Comiter C, et al. Surgical treatment of postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence in adult men: report from the 6th International Consultation on Incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2019; 38:398–406.
Sandhu JS, Breyer B, Comiter C, et al. Incontinence after prostate treatment: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol 2019; 202:369–378.
Khene ZE, Paret F, Perrouin-Verbe MA, et al. Artificial urinary sphincter in male patients with spina bifida: comparison of perioperative and functional outcomes between bulbar urethra and bladder neck cuff placement. J Urol 2018; 199:791–797.
Chartier Kastler E, Genevois S, Gamé X, et al. Treatment of neurogenic male urinary incontinence related to intrinsic sphincter insufficiency with an artificial urinary sphincter: a French retrospective multicentre study. BJU Int 2011; 107:426–432.
Peyronnet B, O’Connor E, Khavari R, et al. AMS-800 Artificial urinary sphincter in female patients with stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn 2019; 38: (Suppl. 4): S28–S41.
Chartier-Kastler E, Van Kerrebroeck P, Olianas R, et al. Artificial urinary sphincter (AMS 800) implantation for women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency: a technique for insiders? BJU Int 2011; 107:1618–1626.
Gonzalez R, Dewolf WC. The artificial bladder sphincter AS-721 for the treatment of incontinence in patients with neurogenic bladder. J Urol 1979; 121:71–72.
Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW. Treatment of urinary incontinence by implantable prosthetic sphincter. Urology 1973; 1:252–259.
Peyronnet B, Capon G, Belas O, et al. Robot-assisted AMS-800 artificial urinary sphincter bladder neck implantation in female patients with stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 2019; 75:169–175.
Fournier G, Callerot P, Thoulouzan M, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic implantation of artificial urinary sphincter in women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency incontinence: initial results. Urology 2014; 84:1094–1098.
Yates DR, Phé V, Rouprêt M, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic artificial urinary sphincter insertion in men with neurogenic stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 2013; 111:1175–1179.
Cox A, Herschorn S, Lee L. Surgical management of female SUI: is there a gold standard? Nat Rev Urol 2013; 10:78–89.
DeLancey JO. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170:1713–1720.
Wallner C, Dabhoiwala NF, DeRuiter MC, Lamers WH. The anatomical components of urinary continence. Eur Urol 2009; 55:932–943.
Osman NI, Li Marzi V, Cornu JN, Drake MJ. Evaluation and classification of stress urinary incontinence: current concepts and future directions. Eur Urol Focus 2016; 2:238–244.
Cour F, Le Normand L, Lapray JF, et al. Intrinsic sphincter deficiency and female urinary incontinence. Prog Urol 2015; 25:437–454.
Pirpiris A, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Urethral mobility and urinary incontinence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36:507–511.
Caputo RM, Benson JT. The Q-tip test and urethrovesical junction mobility. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82:892–896.
Robinson BL, Geller EJ, Parnell BA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of visual urethral mobility exam versus Q-Tip test: a randomized crossover trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206:528.e1–528.e6.
Matsushita K, Chughtai BI, Maschino AC, et al. International variation in artificial urinary sphincter use. Urology 2012; 80:667–672.
Peyronnet B, Hascoet J, Scailteux LM, et al. The changing face of artificial urinary sphincter use in France: the future is female. Eur Urol Focus 2018; 6:1248–1250.
Burkhard C, Bosch JL, Cruz F, et al. EAU guidelines 2020 on urinary incontinence in adults. Available online at: https://uroweb.org/guideline/urinary-incontinence/ . [Accessed 10 October 2020].
Gomelsky A, Athanasiou S, Choo MS, et al. Surgery for urinary incontinence in women: report from the 6th international consultation on incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2019; 38:825–837.
NICE. NICE Guidance: Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management: (c) NICE (2019) Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management. BJU Int 2019; 123:777–803.
Costa P, Poinas G, Ben Naoum K, et al. Long-term results of artificial urinary sphincter for women with type III stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 2013; 63:753–758.
Kobashi KC, Albo ME, Dmochowski RR, et al. Surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol 2017; 198:875–883.
Lee R, Te AE, Kaplan SA, Sandhu JS. Temporal trends in adoption of and indications for the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol 2009; 181:2622–2627.
Bettez M, Tu le M, Carlson K, et al. 2012 update: guidelines for adult urinary incontinence collaborative consensus document for the Canadian Urological Association. Can Urol Assoc J 2012; 6:354–363.
Scott FB. The use of the artificial sphincter in the treatment of urinary incontinence in the female patient. Urol Clin North Am 1985; 12:305–315.
Mandron E, Bryckaert PE, Papatsoris AG. Laparoscopic artificial urinary sphincterimplantation for female genuine stress urinary incontinence: technique and 4-year experience in 25 patients. BJU Int 2010; 106:1194–1198.
Rouprêt M, Misraï V, Vaessen C, et al. Laparoscopic approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation in women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency incontinence: a single-centre preliminary experience. Eur Urol 2010; 57:499–504.
Gamé X, Bram R, Abu Anz S, et al. Laparoscopic insertion of artificial periprostatic urinary sphincter. Urology 2009; 73:442.e1–442.e3.
Peyronnet B, Vincendeau S, Tondut L, et al. Artificial urinary sphincter implantation in women with stress urinary incontinence: preliminary comparison of robot-assisted and open approaches. Int Urogynecol J 2016; 27:475–481.
Zhao Y, Gray G, Martin BS. Techniques: robotic-assisted laparoscopic implantation of artificial urinary sphincter with concomitant hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy. Can Urol Assoc J 2018; 13:E232–E234.
Kourbanhoussen K, Cecchi M, Chevrot A, et al. Laparoscopic robot-assisted artificial urinary sphincter in women: first approach. Prog Urol 2019; 29:371–377.
Gondran-Tellier B, Boissier R, Baboudjian M, et al. Robot-assisted implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter, the AMS-800, via a posterior approach to the bladder neck in women with intrinsic sphincterdeficiency. BJU Int 2019; 124:1077–1080.
Chartier-Kastler E, Vaessen C, Rouprêt M, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic artificial urinary sphincter insertion in women with stress urinary incontinence: a pilot single-centre study. BJU Int 2020; in press. doi: 10.1111/bju.15147.
doi: 10.1111/bju.15147
Peyronnet B, Capon G, Belas O, et al. Robot-assisted artificial urinary sphincter implantation in female patients: an international multicenter study. Eur Urol Open Sci 2020; 19:e604–e605.
Callerot P, Perrouin-Verbe MA, Thoulouzan M, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic implantation of artificial urinary sphincter AMS 800 in woman: single center experience. Prog Urol 2019; 29:246–252.
Biardeau X, Rizk J, Marcelli F, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation in 11 women with urinary stress incontinence: surgical technique and initial experience. Eur Urol 2015; 67:937–942.
Hervé F, Lumen N, Goessaert AS, Everaert K. Persistent urinary incontinence after a robot-assisted artificial urinary sphincter procedure: lessons learnt from two cases. BMJ Case Rep 2016; 2016: pii: bcr2016216971. Doi: 10.1136/bcr-2016-216971.
doi: 10.1136/bcr-2016-216971
pii: bcr2016216971.
Encatassamy F, Hascoet J, Brierre T, et al. Robot-assisted bladder neck artificial urinary sphincter implantation in male patients with neurogenic stress urinary incontinence: a multicenter study. Eur Urol Suppl 2019; 18:e1055doi: 10.1016/S1569-9056(19)30762-6.
doi: 10.1016/S1569-9056(19)30762-6
Valerio M, Jichlinski P, Dahlem R, et al. Experimental evaluation of an electromechanical artificial urinary sphincter in an animal model. BJU Int 2013; 112:E337–E343.
Biardeau X, Hached S, Loutochin O, et al. Montreal electronic artificial urinary sphincters: our futuristic alternatives to the AMS800. Can Urol Assoc J 2017; 11:E396–E404.
Ludwig TA, Reiss P, Wieland M, et al. The ARTUS device: the first feasibility study in human cadavers. Can J Urol 2015; 22:8100–8104.
Gettman M, Rivera M. Innovations in robotic surgery. Curr Opin Urol 2016; 26:271–276.