Objectification of the nasal patency assessment techniques used in nasal allergen provocation testing.
acoustic rhinometry
nasal provocation testing
peak nasal inspiratory flow
rhinomanometry
Journal
Postepy dermatologii i alergologii
ISSN: 1642-395X
Titre abrégé: Postepy Dermatol Alergol
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101168357
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
11
12
2018
accepted:
24
12
2018
entrez:
26
11
2020
pubmed:
27
11
2020
medline:
27
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Topical allergen application in nasal provocation testing (NPT) is associated with remarkably rapid changes in nasal patency. Thus, selecting the techniques of assessing the extent of nasal obstruction (as one of the responses to topical allergen application) is an important component of NPT. The study attempted to systematize and evaluate the techniques selected for assessing nasal patency during NPT based on a review of relevant literature. We reviewed the literature on the attempts to standardize the objective techniques for assessing nasal patency and their use in NPT. The best known, well-established technique for assessing nasal patency as part of NPT was rhinomanometry, followed by peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) testing and acoustic rhinometry.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33240000
doi: 10.5114/ada.2019.81404
pii: 34714
pmc: PMC7675096
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
635-640Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Termedia.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Rhinology. 2005 Sep;43(3):169-79
pubmed: 16218509
Acta Otolaryngol. 2001 Oct;121(7):844-8
pubmed: 11718250
Allergy. 2008 Jul;63(7):820-33
pubmed: 18588547
Rhinology. 2018 Jun 1;56(2):122-126
pubmed: 29055966
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Mar-Apr;72(2):256-60
pubmed: 16951862
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2016 Dec;33(6):464-468
pubmed: 28035225
Rhinology. 1995 Dec;33(4):224-8
pubmed: 8919216
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1992 Apr;17(2):178-82
pubmed: 1587036
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2017 Dec;44(6):713-718
pubmed: 28153693
Otolaryngol Pol. 2016 Oct 31;70(5):31-34
pubmed: 27935540
Auris Nasus Larynx. 1998 Sep;25(3):261-7
pubmed: 9799992
J Laryngol Otol. 2003 Aug;117(8):605-8
pubmed: 12956913
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1989 Apr;14(2):177-82
pubmed: 2656007
Rhinology. 1996 Sep;34(3):156-9
pubmed: 8938884
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1984;46(4):173-91
pubmed: 6379549
Med Sci Monit. 2005 Jan;11(1):CR44-8
pubmed: 15614195
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 May;141(5):1570-1577
pubmed: 29501480
Rhinology. 2011 Aug;49(3):304-8
pubmed: 21858260
J Laryngol Otol. 1987 Aug;101(8):800-8
pubmed: 3655533
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2016 Jul 15;23(3):487-90
pubmed: 27660874
Rhinology. 2008 Mar;46(1):52-5
pubmed: 18444493
Laryngorhinootologie. 1993 Mar;72(3):125-30
pubmed: 8471095
Allergy. 2018 Aug;73(8):1597-1608
pubmed: 29377177
Otolaryngol Pol. 1994;48 Suppl 17:108-11
pubmed: 8090498
Rhinology. 2000 Mar;38(1):1-6
pubmed: 10780040
Allergy. 1999 Sep;54(9):974-9
pubmed: 10505461
Allergy. 2017 Jul;72(7):1035-1042
pubmed: 28122133
Rhinology. 2015 Jun;53(2):160-6
pubmed: 26030039
Am J Rhinol. 2006 Mar-Apr;20(2):203-4
pubmed: 16686389
Laryngoscope. 1991 Mar;101(3):276-8
pubmed: 2000015
J Biomech. 2016 Jun 14;49(9):1670-1678
pubmed: 27083059
Clin Transl Allergy. 2017 Sep 17;7:33
pubmed: 28932387