Axial spondyloarthritis and axial psoriatic arthritis: similar or different disease spectrum?
axial involvement
axial spondyloarthritis
clinical characteristics
psoriatic arthritis
Journal
Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease
ISSN: 1759-720X
Titre abrégé: Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517322
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
02
08
2020
accepted:
28
09
2020
entrez:
26
11
2020
pubmed:
27
11
2020
medline:
27
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
First, to compare clinical features and biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) response in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and axial psoriatic arthritis (axPsA). Second, to identify possible predictors of treatment response in both entities. One-year follow-up, observational, single-center study including all patients with axSpA or axPsA who started bDMARDs therapy. Clinical features were collected at baseline while disease activity was measured at baseline, 6 and 12 months by the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score and the Physician Global Assessment. The frequency of patients achieving inactive disease (ID), low disease activity (LDA), high or very high disease activity and clinical improvement were compared between axSpA and axPsA. Baseline predictor factors for achieving treatment response were identified through regression models, using odds ratio (OR) as an estimate. In total, 352 patients were included: 287 (81.5%) axSpA and 65 (18.5%) axPsA. No significant differences at baseline were observed between the two diseases for most of the characteristics. While HLA-B27 positivity was associated with axSpA (OR = 5.4; In clinical practice, patients with axSpA and axPsA present numerous similarities, including comparable medium-term clinical response to bDMARDs. Male gender could be a predictor of treatment response in both diseases.Keyword: axial spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial involvement, clinical characteristics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33240404
doi: 10.1177/1759720X20971889
pii: 10.1177_1759720X20971889
pmc: PMC7675867
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1759720X20971889Informations de copyright
© The Author(s), 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest statement: DB received grants/speaker/research supports from Roche and Abbvie. CP received grants/speaker/research supports from Pfizer, Sanofi, Novartis, Roche and Lilly. RN received grants/speaker/research supports from Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Pfizer and Montpellier. IM received grants/research supports from Novartis and speaker’s fees from AbbVie, UCB, Roche and Novartis. DP received grants/research supports from Abbvie, Lilly, MSD and Roche, and had participation in company sponsored speaker’s bureau from Abbvie, Novartis, Lilly, Roche, and MSD. AB received grant/research support, fees for consultancies or as a speaker for Abbvie, Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, Nordic, Sanofi, Sandoz, Lilly, UCB, Roche. VN: consultancy/speaker/research grants from: Abbvie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB.
Références
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2019 Jul;31(4):329-334
pubmed: 31135567
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Oct;77(10):1539-1540
pubmed: 29453216
J Rheumatol. 2009 Dec;36(12):2744-50
pubmed: 19884276
J Rheumatol. 2009 Dec;36(12):2633-4
pubmed: 19966191
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Feb 27;17:106
pubmed: 26922375
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Dec;66(12):1759-66
pubmed: 25047391
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Feb;52(2):582-91
pubmed: 15692973
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):39-47
pubmed: 24013647
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Jun 1;59(6):1340-1346
pubmed: 31593590
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2018 Jun;14(6):363-371
pubmed: 29752461
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Apr;76(4):701-707
pubmed: 27913376
J Rheumatol. 2011 Aug;38(8):1656-60
pubmed: 21632676
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):990-9
pubmed: 24482301
J Rheumatol. 2010 Apr;37(4):809-15
pubmed: 20231209