The impact of e-cigarette and cigarette prices on e-cigarette and cigarette sales in California.
California
Cigarettes
E-cigarettes
Own- and cross-price elasticity
Journal
Preventive medicine reports
ISSN: 2211-3355
Titre abrégé: Prev Med Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101643766
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
27
10
2020
accepted:
29
10
2020
entrez:
26
11
2020
pubmed:
27
11
2020
medline:
27
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although numerous studies have examined the impact of cigarette prices on cigarette demand, research examining the impact of e-cigarette and cigarette prices on e-cigarette demand is relatively limited. This study estimated the impact of e-cigarette and cigarette prices on e-cigarette and cigarette sales in California. Using the 2012-2017 Nielsen Retail Scanner Data, we constructed e-cigarette prices, cigarette prices, and per capita e-cigarette and cigarette sales by year, quarter, and Nielsen scantrack market in California. E-cigarettes were categorized as disposable or reusable. Separate fixed-effects models estimated the impact of e-cigarette and cigarette prices on per capita disposable e-cigarette, reusable e-cigarette, and cigarette sales controlling for year, quarter, market, and smoke-free air law coverage. Average prices were $5.86 per pack of 20 cigarettes, $9.80 per disposable e-cigarette, and $19.11 per reusable e-cigarette. When prices of disposable e-cigarettes, reusable e-cigarettes, and cigarettes increased by 1%, per capita sales of the products decreased by 0.37%, 0.20%, and 0.21% respectively. Cigarette prices were positively associated with per capita sales of reusable e-cigarettes, indicating reusable e-cigarettes are substitutes for cigarettes. Reusable e-cigarette prices were positively associated with per capita sales of disposable e-cigarettes, indicating disposable e-cigarettes are substitutes for reusable e-cigarettes. No statistically significant association was found between disposable/reusable e-cigarette prices and cigarette sales. Our results suggest that raising prices of disposable e-cigarettes, reusable e-cigarettes, and cigarettes such as via tobacco excise tax increases would result in reduced sales for the products. Policymakers should consider the substitution between e-cigarettes and cigarettes when designing tobacco control policies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33240784
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101244
pii: S2211-3355(20)30202-3
pmc: PMC7674118
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
101244Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
JAMA. 2018 Oct 2;320(13):1379-1380
pubmed: 30285167
Tob Control. 2010 Apr;19 Suppl 1:i3-15
pubmed: 20382647
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Nov 15;68(45):1013-1019
pubmed: 31725711
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Feb 15;68(6):157-164
pubmed: 30763302
JAMA. 2019 Sep 16;:
pubmed: 31524940
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Nov 09;67(44):1225-1232
pubmed: 30408019
Soc Sci Med. 2005 May;60(10):2351-8
pubmed: 15748682
Prev Med. 2018 Dec;117:107-114
pubmed: 29684418
Health Econ. 2017 Aug;26(8):1067-1086
pubmed: 27402419
Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23 Suppl 3:iii41-7
pubmed: 24935898
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2019 Nov 06;68(12):1-22
pubmed: 31805035