Study to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for identifying undiagnosed COPD among residents (≥40 years) in four cities in China: protocol for a multicentre cross-sectional study on behalf of the Breathe Well group.
chronic airways disease
health economics
primary care
public health
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 11 2020
27 11 2020
Historique:
entrez:
28
11
2020
pubmed:
29
11
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The latest chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) epidemiology survey in China estimated that there were 99 million potential COPD patients in the country, the majority of whom are undiagnosed. Screening for COPD in primary care settings is of vital importance for China, but it is not known which strategy would be the most suitable for adoption in primary care. Studies have been conducted to test the accuracy of questionnaires, expiratory peak flow meters and microspirometers to screen for COPD, but no study has directly evaluated and compared the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these methods in the Chinese setting. We present the protocol for a multicentre cross-sectional study, to be conducted in eight community hospitals from four cities among Chinese adults aged 40 years or older to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different case-finding methods for COPD, and determine the test performance of individual and combinations of screening tests and strategies in comparison with quality diagnostic spirometry. Index tests are screening questionnaires (COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (CDQ), COPD Assessment in Primary Care To Identify Undiagnosed Respiratory Disease and Exacerbation Risk Questionnaire (CAPTURE), symptom-based questionnaire, COPD Screening Questionnaire (COPD-SQ)), microspirometer and peak flow. Each participant will complete all of these tests in one assessment. The primary analysis will compare the performance of a screening questionnaire with a handheld device. Secondary analyses will include the comparative performance of each index test, as well as a comparison of strategies where we use a screening questionnaire and a handheld device. Approximately 2000 participants will be recruited over 9 to 12 months. The study has been approved by Peking University Hospital and University of Birmingham. All study participants will provide written informed consent. Study results will be published in appropriate journal and presented at national and international conferences, as well as relevant social media and various community/stakeholder engagement activities. ISRCTN13357135.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33247005
pii: bmjopen-2019-035738
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035738
pmc: PMC7703419
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e035738Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 04;11(1):e0145571
pubmed: 26726887
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013 Dec;17(12):1645-51
pubmed: 24200283
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Oct 15;176(8):753-60
pubmed: 17575095
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2095-128
pubmed: 23245604
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Sep 15;176(6):532-55
pubmed: 17507545
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Jun 13;13:1901-1912
pubmed: 29942123
Chin Med J (Engl). 2010 Jun;123(12):1494-9
pubmed: 20819499
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012 May;16(5):674-80
pubmed: 22409956
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2018 May 10;39(5):580-585
pubmed: 29860798
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 26;6:30419
pubmed: 27456860
Respir Care. 2019 Jan;64(1):63-70
pubmed: 30087194
Stat Med. 2002 Mar 30;21(6):835-52
pubmed: 11870820
COPD. 2005 Jun;2(2):225-32
pubmed: 17136949
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2014 Aug 14;24:14033
pubmed: 25119686
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Jun;6(6):421-430
pubmed: 29650407
Respiration. 2006;73(3):285-95
pubmed: 16330875
BMJ. 2003 Sep 20;327(7416):653-4
pubmed: 14500437
Prim Care Respir J. 2011 Jun;20(2):190-8, 2 p following 198
pubmed: 21597667
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar 15;195(6):748-756
pubmed: 27783539
JAMA. 2016 Apr 5;315(13):1372-7
pubmed: 27046365
Lancet. 2018 Apr 28;391(10131):1706-1717
pubmed: 29650248
COPD. 2008 Apr;5(2):85-95
pubmed: 18415807
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 08;5(10):e008133
pubmed: 26450427
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2020 Jan 3;30(1):2
pubmed: 31900421
Chron Respir Dis. 2016 May;13(2):137-43
pubmed: 26869578
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Aug 19;17(1):112
pubmed: 27542843
Thorax. 2008 May;63(5):402-7
pubmed: 18234906
Respirology. 2016 Jan;21(1):14-23
pubmed: 26494423
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2014 Jul 10;24:14024
pubmed: 25010522
BMJ. 2015 Oct 28;351:h5527
pubmed: 26511519