I want to go home: should we abandon open surgery for treatment of rectal prolapse? Consideration of discharge destination following surgery for rectal prolapse.
NSQIP
minimally invasive surgery
perineal surgery
rectal prolapse
Journal
Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland
ISSN: 1463-1318
Titre abrégé: Colorectal Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883611
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
revised:
18
11
2020
received:
11
08
2020
accepted:
18
11
2020
pubmed:
29
11
2020
medline:
21
8
2021
entrez:
28
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite the financial and value-based implications associated with higher levels of care at discharge, few studies have evaluated modifiable treatment factors that may optimize postacute care. The aim of this work was to assess the association between operative approach and disposition to a higher level of care and other outcomes following surgery for rectal prolapse. Using a retrospective cohort study design, the database of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was used to identify patients with rectal prolapse who underwent perineal repair or open or laparoscopic rectopexy with or without resection between 2012 and 2017. Discharge destination and 30-day postoperative outcomes were compared using propensity score mathcing and weighting. Nomograms generated using multivariable regression calculated the risk of requiring higher levels of care upon discharge and morbidity. Propensity-score analysis included 3000 patients [1500 in the perineal group, 580 in the open abdominal group and 920 in the minimally invasive (MIS) group]. Patients who received open abdominal surgery were more likely to require elevation of care at destination compared with those who received perineal surgery (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.22-1.24) and MIS abdominal surgery (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.18-2.76). Similar effects were seen for overall morbidity. Increased age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class, congestive heart failure, dependent functional status and open surgery were independent predictors of discharge to higher level of care (c-statistic = 0.79). Open surgery compared with MIS and perineal surgery was associated with higher levels of discharge disposition following rectal prolapse surgery. Future research should continue to identify modifiable treatment factors that reduce poor postoperative outcomes among patients with rectal prolapse.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
955-966Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
Références
Kim DS, Tsang CBS, Wong WD, Lowry AC, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD. Complete rectal prolapse: evolution of management and results. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:460-6.
Marderstein EL, Delaney CP. Surgical management of rectal prolapse. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;140:63-73.
Tou S, Brown SR, Nelson RL. Surgery for complete (full-thickness) rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015:CD001758.
Tou S, Brown SR, Malik AI, Nelson RL. Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008:CD001758.
Senapati A, Gray RG, Middleton LJ, Harding J, Hills RK, Armitage NCM, et al. PROSPER: a randomised comparison of surgical treatments for rectal prolapse. Color Dis. 2013;15:858-68.
Clark C, Jupiter D, Thomas J, Papaconstantinou H. Rectal prolapse in the elderly: trends in surgical management and outcomes from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:709-14.
Fang SH, Cromwell JW, Wilkins KB, Eisenstat TE, Notaro JR, Alva S, et al. Is the abdominal repair of rectal prolapse safer than perineal repair in the highest risk patients? An NSQIP analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:1167-72.
Mustain WC, Davenport DL, Parcells JP, Vargas HD, Hourigan JS. Abdominal versus perineal approach for treatment of rectal prolapse: comparable safety in a propensity-matched cohort. Am Surg. 2013;79:686-92.
Young MT, Jafari MD, Phelan MJ, Stamos MJ, Mills S, Pigazzi A, et al. Surgical treatments for rectal prolapse: how does a perineal approach compare in the laparoscopic era? Surg Endosc. 2015;29:607-13.
Daniel VT, Davids JS, Sturrock PR, Maykel JA, Phatak UR, Alavi K. Getting to the bottom of treatment of rectal prolapse in the elderly: analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). Am J Surg. 2019;218:288-92.
Cook CH, Martin LC, Howard B, Flancbaum LJ. Survival of critically ill surgical patients discharged to extended care facilities. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;189:437-41.
Buntin MB, Colla CH, Escarce JJ. Effects of payment changes on trends in post-acute care. Health Serv Res. 2009;44:1188-210.
Chen LM, Norton EC, Banerjee M, Regenbogen SE, Cain-Nielsen AH, Birkmeyer JD. Spending on care after surgery driven by choice of care settings instead of intensity of services. Health Aff. 2017;36:83-90.
Burke RE, Ibrahim SA. Discharge destination and disparities in postoperative care. J Am Med Assoc. 2018;319:1653-4.
Greifer N. WeightIt: weighting for covariate balance in observational studies. R package version 0.10.2; 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=WeightIt (accessed October 2020).
Harrell FE Jr. rms: Regression Modeling Strategies. R package version 6.0-1; 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rms
Bordeianou L, Paquette I, Johnson E, Holubar SD, Gaertner W, Feingold DL, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60:1121-31.
Al-Mazrou AM, Chiuzan C, Kiran RP. Factors influencing discharge disposition after colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:3032-40.
Deen KI, Grant E, Billingham C, Keighley MRB. Abdominal resection rectopexy with pelvic floor repair versus perineal rectosigmoidectomy and pelvic floor repair for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 1994;81:302-4.
Mohanty S, Liu Y, Paruch JL, Kmiecik TE, Cohen ME, Ko CY, et al. Risk of discharge to postacute care: a patient-centered outcome for the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical risk calculator. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:480-4.
Legner VJ, Massarweh NN, Symons RG, McCormick WC, Flum DR. The significance of discharge to skilled care after abdominopelvic surgery in older adults. Ann Surg. 2009;249:250-5.
Balentine CJ, Naik AD, Robinson CN, Petersen NJ, Chen GJ, Berger DH, et al. Association of high-volume hospitals with greater likelihood of discharge to home following colorectal surgery. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:244-51.
Sacks GD, Lawson EH, Dawes AJ, Gibbons MM, Zingmond DS, Ko CY. Which patients require more care after hospital discharge? An analysis of post-acute care use among elderly patients undergoing elective surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220:1113-21.
Rothenhoefer S, Herrle F, Herold A, Joos A, Bussen D, Kieser M, et al. DeloRes trial: study protocol for a randomized trial comparing two standardized surgical approaches in rectal prolapse - Delorme’s procedure versus resection rectopexy. Trials. 2012;13:155.