Effect of digestible amino acids to energy ratios on performance and yield of two broiler lines housed in different grow-out environmental temperatures.
amino acids to energy ratio
broiler lines
environmental temperature
performance
yield
Journal
Poultry science
ISSN: 1525-3171
Titre abrégé: Poult Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0401150
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
05
02
2020
revised:
27
07
2020
accepted:
01
09
2020
entrez:
29
11
2020
pubmed:
30
11
2020
medline:
13
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Two broiler lines, Line A and Line B, were fed experimental diets from 22 to 42 d with objectives to determine effects of digestible amino acids (AA) to metabolizable energy ratios on feed intake (FI), performance, and processing yield. Experimental diets were formulated to 3,150 kcal/kg with 5 levels of digestible lysine (dLys)-80, 90, 100, 110, and 120% of recommended AA level giving g dLys/Mcal values of 2.53, 2.85, 3.17, 3.48, and 3.80, respectively. All other AA were formulated to a fixed ratio to dLys. A total of 4,050 chicks were utilized in each trial (9 replicate pens for each AA level and each line; 45 chicks/pen) conducted twice: one in hot environmental temperature (HT) (24 h mean ∼85.3 °F; 80.9% RH) and another in cool environmental temperature (CT) (24 h mean ∼71.6 °F; 61.7% RH). Results showed that FI was not impacted by dietary AA levels in HT for both lines. Higher FI (P < 0.05) was observed in CT for lower dietary AA levels (<100% AA level) for both lines, with overall higher FI occurring in Line B. Higher FI for Line B was also accompanied by higher body weight in HT and CT. Treatment diets had quadratic effects on average daily gain (ADG), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and processing yields (breasts and tenders) in both HT and CT, with broilers in CT performing better (P < 0.05). The optimal response values for ADG in HT and CT were 89.72 g and 113.44 g occurring at 120 and 109.5% AA level, respectively. The optimal response values for FCR in HT and CT were 1.79 and 1.58 occurring at 120 and 117.5% AA level, respectively. The optimal response values for breast meat yield in HT and CT were 575.9 g and 776.5 g occurring at 112.6 and 114.5% AA level, respectively. The optimal response values for tender meat yield in HT and CT were 119.8 g and 154.9 g occurring at 120 and 115% AA level, respectively. Line A had a higher breast and tender yield % (of live weight) for both environmental temperatures which correlated to body composition data with higher % protein mass and % digestible AA retention. In this study, findings indicated that effects of increased digestible AA density on FI, performance, and processing yield are specific to strain and grow-out temperature, but the optimum response was attained for both lines with diets containing 110 to 120% AA levels (3.48-3.80 g dLys/Mcal) during the 22 to 42 d finisher period.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33248604
pii: S0032-5791(20)30648-9
doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.019
pmc: PMC7704956
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Amino Acids
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6884-6898Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Références
Reprod Nutr Dev. 1999 Jan-Feb;39(1):145-56
pubmed: 10222505
J Nutr. 2000 Apr;130(4):813-9
pubmed: 10736335
Int J Biometeorol. 2017 Dec;61(12):2111-2118
pubmed: 28799035
Br Poult Sci. 2000 May;41(2):214-8
pubmed: 10890219
Br Poult Sci. 1997 Dec;38(5):607-10
pubmed: 9511009
Poult Sci. 1996 May;75(5):627-31
pubmed: 8722911
Poult Sci. 2018 Dec 1;97(12):4150-4158
pubmed: 29982693
Poult Sci. 1996 Apr;75(4):522-8
pubmed: 8786943
J Anim Sci. 2004 Jan;82(1):179-83
pubmed: 14753360
J Anim Sci. 2012 Dec;90 Suppl 4:257-9
pubmed: 23365348
Poult Sci. 1998 Feb;77(2):276-81
pubmed: 9495493
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2018 Feb;102(1):e11-e20
pubmed: 28447340
Domest Anim Endocrinol. 1993 Oct;10(4):279-87
pubmed: 8306632
Poult Sci. 2011 Jul;90(7):1435-40
pubmed: 21673158
Poult Sci. 1995 Jun;74(6):968-75
pubmed: 7644426
Poult Sci. 2003 Dec;82(12):1932-8
pubmed: 14717551
Fed Proc. 1982 Sep;41(11):2821-3
pubmed: 6811330
Br Poult Sci. 2008 Jul;49(4):487-95
pubmed: 18704796
Poult Sci. 1980 Jul;59(7):1434-41
pubmed: 7393854
Br Poult Sci. 1987 Jun;28(2):185-95
pubmed: 3111645
Br Poult Sci. 1993 Sep;34(4):737-46
pubmed: 8242409
Poult Sci. 2018 Aug 1;97(8):2845-2853
pubmed: 29688556
Br Poult Sci. 1991 Sep;32(4):789-98
pubmed: 1933449
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2020 Sep;104(5):1351-1364
pubmed: 32358883
Poult Sci. 2018 Apr 1;97(4):1189-1198
pubmed: 29340638
J Mol Endocrinol. 2012 Feb 22;48(2):129-38
pubmed: 22279186
Poult Sci. 2019 Sep 1;98(9):4048-4057
pubmed: 30968121
Poult Sci. 2012 Jun;91(6):1281-5
pubmed: 22582283