Economic evaluation of suture versus clip anastomosis in arteriovenous fistula creation.
Adult
Aged
Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical
/ adverse effects
Cost Savings
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Female
Health Care Costs
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications
/ economics
Renal Dialysis
/ economics
Retrospective Studies
Surgical Instruments
/ economics
Suture Techniques
/ adverse effects
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Patency
Arteriovenous fistula
Autogenous fistula
Clinical outcomes
Cost effectiveness
Dialysis access
Vascular clips
Journal
Journal of vascular surgery
ISSN: 1097-6809
Titre abrégé: J Vasc Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8407742
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2021
06 2021
Historique:
received:
24
06
2020
accepted:
20
10
2020
pubmed:
30
11
2020
medline:
12
10
2021
entrez:
29
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Techniques such as the use of nonpenetrating vascular clips for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) anastomotic creation have been developed in an effort to reduce fistula-related complications. However, the outcomes data for the use of clips have remained equivocal, and the cost evaluations to support their use have been largely theoretical. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine both the clinical and the cost outcomes of AVFs created with nonpenetrating vascular clips compared with the continuous suture technique during a 10-year period at a single institution. All patients undergoing AVF creation in the upper extremity from 2009 through 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patient demographics and AVF outcomes were collected and compared stratified by the surgical technique used. A cost analysis was performed of a subgroup of patients from 2013 to 2018. During the 10-year study period, 916 AVFs were created (79% using the continuous suture technique and 21% using nonpenetrating vascular clips). Patient demographics and comorbid conditions did not differ between the two groups, and no differences were present in maturation, primary patency, assisted primary patency, or complication rates between the two groups at 1 year. The suture group had a shorter time to maturation (4.3 months vs 5.5 months; P < .01) and improved secondary patency compared with the clip group (77.13% vs 69.59%; P = .03) The cost analysis of the procedures revealed a significant difference in direct costs (suture, $1389.26 vs clip, $1716.51; P < .01) and contribution margin (suture, $1770.19 vs clip, $1128.36; P < .01) for the two groups. Both suture and clip techniques in AVF creation demonstrated equivalent rates of maturation, primary patency, assisted primary patency, and complications at 1 year with higher expense associated with the use of clips. Thus, in an effort to reduce the economic burden of healthcare in the United States, the findings from the present study support the preferential use of the standard polypropylene suture technique when creating upper extremity AVFs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33249206
pii: S0741-5214(20)32484-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.10.076
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2098-2104Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.