Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Treatment Times for Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology Multicenter Collaboration.
goals
groin
pandemics
punctures
thrombectomy
Journal
Stroke
ISSN: 1524-4628
Titre abrégé: Stroke
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0235266
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2021
01 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
1
12
2020
medline:
8
1
2021
entrez:
30
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to an unprecedented paradigm shift in medical care. We sought to evaluate whether the COVID-19 pandemic may have contributed to delays in acute stroke management at comprehensive stroke centers. Pooled clinical data of consecutive adult stroke patients from 14 US comprehensive stroke centers (January 1, 2019, to July 31, 2020) were queried. The rate of thrombolysis for nontransferred patients within the Target: Stroke goal of 60 minutes was compared between patients admitted from March 1, 2019, and July 31, 2019 (pre-COVID-19), and March 1, 2020, to July 31, 2020 (COVID-19). The time from arrival to imaging and treatment with thrombolysis or thrombectomy, as continuous variables, were also assessed. Of the 2955 patients who met inclusion criteria, 1491 were admitted during the pre-COVID-19 period and 1464 were admitted during COVID-19, 15% of whom underwent intravenous thrombolysis. Patients treated during COVID-19 were at lower odds of receiving thrombolysis within 60 minutes of arrival (odds ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.38-0.98]; Evaluation for acute ischemic stroke during the COVID-19 period was associated with a small but significant delay in intravenous thrombolysis but no significant delay in thrombectomy time metrics. Taking steps to reduce delays from imaging to bolus time has the potential to attenuate this collateral effect of the pandemic.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
The pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to an unprecedented paradigm shift in medical care. We sought to evaluate whether the COVID-19 pandemic may have contributed to delays in acute stroke management at comprehensive stroke centers.
METHODS
Pooled clinical data of consecutive adult stroke patients from 14 US comprehensive stroke centers (January 1, 2019, to July 31, 2020) were queried. The rate of thrombolysis for nontransferred patients within the Target: Stroke goal of 60 minutes was compared between patients admitted from March 1, 2019, and July 31, 2019 (pre-COVID-19), and March 1, 2020, to July 31, 2020 (COVID-19). The time from arrival to imaging and treatment with thrombolysis or thrombectomy, as continuous variables, were also assessed.
RESULTS
Of the 2955 patients who met inclusion criteria, 1491 were admitted during the pre-COVID-19 period and 1464 were admitted during COVID-19, 15% of whom underwent intravenous thrombolysis. Patients treated during COVID-19 were at lower odds of receiving thrombolysis within 60 minutes of arrival (odds ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.38-0.98];
CONCLUSIONS
Evaluation for acute ischemic stroke during the COVID-19 period was associated with a small but significant delay in intravenous thrombolysis but no significant delay in thrombectomy time metrics. Taking steps to reduce delays from imaging to bolus time has the potential to attenuate this collateral effect of the pandemic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33250041
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032789
pmc: PMC7934334
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
40-47Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Stroke. 2020 Jun;51(6):1896-1901
pubmed: 32347790
Int J Stroke. 2021 Jun;16(4):437-447
pubmed: 32852257
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 May 1;6(3):262-9
pubmed: 23633218
Stroke. 2020 Aug;51(8):2540-2543
pubmed: 32466736
Stroke. 2020 Jul;51(7):2002-2011
pubmed: 32432996
Eur Neurol. 2020;83(2):213-215
pubmed: 32289789
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May;20(5):533-534
pubmed: 32087114
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Sep;29(9):105068
pubmed: 32807471
Stroke. 2020 Jul;51(7):1991-1995
pubmed: 32438895
Stroke. 2011 Oct;42(10):2983-9
pubmed: 21885841
Stroke. 2019 Apr;50(4):1013-1016
pubmed: 30841820
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 23;383(4):400-401
pubmed: 32383831
J Neurointerv Surg. 2013 Jul;5(4):294-7
pubmed: 22581925
JAMA. 2020 Jun 2;323(21):2137-2138
pubmed: 32239184
Stroke. 2020 Aug;51(8):2315-2321
pubmed: 32530738
J Stroke. 2020 May;22(2):275-277
pubmed: 32635695
Anaesthesia. 2020 Jul;75(7):920-927
pubmed: 32246849
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Jul;12(7):664-668
pubmed: 32451358
Neurology. 1999 Mar 23;52(5):984-90
pubmed: 10102417
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Aug;29(8):104988
pubmed: 32689650
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Jul;17(7):865-872
pubmed: 32425710
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Aug;29(8):104953
pubmed: 32689621
Stroke. 2020 Jul;51(7):1996-2001
pubmed: 32432997
Stroke. 2020 Jun;51(6):1910-1912
pubmed: 32233972
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 14;382(20):e60
pubmed: 32343504
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Jun 1;77(6):683-690
pubmed: 32275288
Lancet Neurol. 2012 May;11(5):397-404
pubmed: 22497929