'Clean athlete status' cannot be certified: Calling for caution, evidence and transparency in 'alternative' anti-doping systems.
Anti-doping
Athlete
Athlete Biological Passport
Athlete entourage
Athlete support personnel
Clean sport
Doping attitude
Testing
Therapeutic Use Exemption
Whereabouts
Journal
The International journal on drug policy
ISSN: 1873-4758
Titre abrégé: Int J Drug Policy
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9014759
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2021
07 2021
Historique:
received:
03
07
2020
revised:
17
10
2020
accepted:
30
10
2020
pubmed:
1
12
2020
medline:
11
8
2021
entrez:
30
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Athletes, sponsors and sport organisations all have a vested interest in upholding the values of clean sport. Despite the considerable and concerted efforts of the global anti-doping system over two decades, the present system is imperfect. Capitalising upon consequent frustrations of athletes, event organisers and sponsors, alternative anti-doping systems have emerged outside the global regulatory framework. The operating principles of these systems raise several concerns, notably including accountability, legitimacy and fairness to athletes. In this paper, we scrutinise the Clean Protocol™, which is the most comprehensive alternative system, for its shortcomings through detailed analysis of its alleged logical and scientific merits. Specifically, we draw the attention of the anti-doping community - including researchers and practitioners - to the potential pitfalls of using assessment tools beyond the scope for which they have been validated, and implementing new approaches without validation. Further, we argue that whilst protecting clean sport is critically important to all stakeholders, protocols that put athletes in disadvantageous positions and/or pose risks to their professional and personal lives lack legitimacy. We criticise the use of anti-doping data and scientific research out of context, and highlight unintended harms that are likely to arise from the widespread implementation of such protocols in parallel with - or in place of - the existing global anti-doping framework.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33250439
pii: S0955-3959(20)30368-6
doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.103030
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
103030Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declarations of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. All authors are active researchers and practitioners in anti-doping, many serving in unpaid advisory positions with anti-doping organisations and have benefitted from competitively awarded research funding for anti-doping research. None of these activities are related to the content of this paper.