Smartphone and App Usage in Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery: Survey Study of Physicians Regarding Acceptance, Risks, and Future Prospects in Germany.
communication
mHealth
medicine
orthopedics
smartphone
surveys and questionnaires
technology
trauma surgery
Journal
JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Nov 2020
30 Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
24
05
2019
accepted:
02
10
2020
revised:
02
08
2020
entrez:
30
11
2020
pubmed:
1
12
2020
medline:
1
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In the course of digitization, smartphones are affecting an increasing number of areas of users' lives, giving them almost ubiquitous access to the internet and other web applications. Mobile health (mHealth) has become an integral part of some areas of patient care. In contrast to other disciplines, routine integration of mobile devices in orthopedics and trauma surgery in Germany is still in its infancy. This study aimed to investigate physicians' current state of opinion regarding acceptance, future prospects, and risks of medical apps in the field of orthopedics and trauma surgery in Germany. A web-based survey among orthopedics and trauma surgeons in German university hospitals on the use of medical apps in everyday clinical practice was conducted between September 2018 and February 2019. The survey consisted of 13 open- and closed-ended or multiple-choice questions. A logistic regression analysis was performed to ascertain the effects of interindividual characteristics on the likelihood of participants' app and smartphone usage behavior. A total of 206 physicians participated in the survey. All of the participants (206/206, 100%) owned a smartphone, and 79.1% (159/201) used the device, while 64.7% (130/201) used apps regularly in everyday clinical practice. Medical apps were perceived as beneficial, given their substantial future promise, by 90.1% (181/201) of the participants. However, 62.5% (120/192) of the participants were not satisfied with the current supply of medical apps in app stores. Desired specifications for future apps were "intuitive usability" (167/201, 83.1%), "no advertising" (145/201, 72.1%), and "free apps" (92/201, 45.8%). The attributes "transparent app development and app sponsoring" (75/201, 37.3%) and the existence of an "easy-to-understand privacy statement" (50/201, 24.9%) were of minor relevance. The majority of the participants (162/194, 83.5%) considered that future apps in the field of "medical research" would provide the greatest benefit. The greatest predicted risks were "data misuse" (147/189, 77.8%), "usage of untrustworthy apps" (135/189, 71.4%), and "alienation from patients" (51/189, 27.0%). Increasing age was significantly associated with a reduction in the likelihood of regular smartphone (odds ratio [OR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.97; P=.002) and app (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.96; P=.001) usage, while the medical profession grade had no significant impact on the usage behavior. The study demonstrates that young German doctors in orthopedics and trauma surgery already use smartphones and apps in everyday clinical practice. Medical apps are considered to play an important role in the future. However, a significant discrepancy exists between the supply and demand of mHealth applications, which creates a legal and ethical vacuum with regard to data protection.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In the course of digitization, smartphones are affecting an increasing number of areas of users' lives, giving them almost ubiquitous access to the internet and other web applications. Mobile health (mHealth) has become an integral part of some areas of patient care. In contrast to other disciplines, routine integration of mobile devices in orthopedics and trauma surgery in Germany is still in its infancy.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to investigate physicians' current state of opinion regarding acceptance, future prospects, and risks of medical apps in the field of orthopedics and trauma surgery in Germany.
METHODS
METHODS
A web-based survey among orthopedics and trauma surgeons in German university hospitals on the use of medical apps in everyday clinical practice was conducted between September 2018 and February 2019. The survey consisted of 13 open- and closed-ended or multiple-choice questions. A logistic regression analysis was performed to ascertain the effects of interindividual characteristics on the likelihood of participants' app and smartphone usage behavior.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 206 physicians participated in the survey. All of the participants (206/206, 100%) owned a smartphone, and 79.1% (159/201) used the device, while 64.7% (130/201) used apps regularly in everyday clinical practice. Medical apps were perceived as beneficial, given their substantial future promise, by 90.1% (181/201) of the participants. However, 62.5% (120/192) of the participants were not satisfied with the current supply of medical apps in app stores. Desired specifications for future apps were "intuitive usability" (167/201, 83.1%), "no advertising" (145/201, 72.1%), and "free apps" (92/201, 45.8%). The attributes "transparent app development and app sponsoring" (75/201, 37.3%) and the existence of an "easy-to-understand privacy statement" (50/201, 24.9%) were of minor relevance. The majority of the participants (162/194, 83.5%) considered that future apps in the field of "medical research" would provide the greatest benefit. The greatest predicted risks were "data misuse" (147/189, 77.8%), "usage of untrustworthy apps" (135/189, 71.4%), and "alienation from patients" (51/189, 27.0%). Increasing age was significantly associated with a reduction in the likelihood of regular smartphone (odds ratio [OR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.97; P=.002) and app (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.96; P=.001) usage, while the medical profession grade had no significant impact on the usage behavior.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The study demonstrates that young German doctors in orthopedics and trauma surgery already use smartphones and apps in everyday clinical practice. Medical apps are considered to play an important role in the future. However, a significant discrepancy exists between the supply and demand of mHealth applications, which creates a legal and ethical vacuum with regard to data protection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33252340
pii: v4i11e14787
doi: 10.2196/14787
pmc: PMC7735902
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e14787Informations de copyright
©Florian Dittrich, David Alexander Back, Anna Katharina Harren, Stefan Landgraeber, Felix Reinecke, Sebastian Serong, Sascha Beck. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (http://formative.jmir.org), 30.11.2020.
Références
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Sep 29;66(13):1489-96
pubmed: 26403346
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Jul;25(5):821-6
pubmed: 25633127
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan;67(1):3-6
pubmed: 30574881
Acta Radiol Open. 2019 Feb 21;8(2):2058460119830222
pubmed: 30815280
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 25;8:605
pubmed: 28487665
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Dec 27;18(4):14
pubmed: 30613197
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2018 Jun;107(13):712-716
pubmed: 29921177
Radiologe. 2018 Mar;58(3):236-240
pubmed: 29318348
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jun 24;8(6):e21600
pubmed: 32579538
Hosp Pharm. 2014 Jun;49(6):585-6
pubmed: 24958977
J Med Pract Manage. 2015 Nov-Dec;31(3):187-90
pubmed: 26856033
Orthopade. 2018 Oct;47(10):842-848
pubmed: 30039468
Clin Teach. 2018 Feb;15(1):29-33
pubmed: 28300343
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Nov 04;3(4):e101
pubmed: 26537656
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Aug 16;8(3):832-844
pubmed: 28885637
Online J Public Health Inform. 2015 Jul 01;7(2):e218
pubmed: 26392848
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 08;15(3):
pubmed: 29518050
Z Orthop Unfall. 2020 May 04;:
pubmed: 32365397
Int J Rehabil Res. 2019 Mar;42(1):11-19
pubmed: 30640272
Nat Rev Cancer. 2018 Aug;18(8):500-510
pubmed: 29777175
Ochsner J. 2015 Spring;15(1):52-7
pubmed: 25829881
J Behav Addict. 2017 Jun 1;6(2):168-177
pubmed: 28425777
Laryngorhinootologie. 2019 Mar;98(S 01):S253-S289
pubmed: 31096301
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Jul;28(7):1249-1256
pubmed: 31056396
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2015 Oct 12;7:23
pubmed: 26464800
Health Psychol Open. 2018 Feb 02;5(1):2055102918755046
pubmed: 29435355
P T. 2014 May;39(5):356-64
pubmed: 24883008
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Aug 09;4(3):e96
pubmed: 27507641
J Orthop Sci. 2019 Sep;24(5):812-816
pubmed: 30686690
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;231:82-90
pubmed: 27782019
J R Soc Med. 2019 Jan;112(1):22-28
pubmed: 30507284
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019 Jan-Apr;27(1):2309499019825578
pubmed: 30798733
Unfallchirurg. 2019 Sep;122(9):690-696
pubmed: 31127352