Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of GST-tagged recombinant antigens 2B2t, Ag5t and DIPOL in ELISA for the diagnosis and follow up of patients with cystic echinococcosis.
Animals
Antibodies, Helminth
/ blood
Antigens, Helminth
/ genetics
Cohort Studies
Cross Reactions
Echinococcosis
/ diagnosis
Echinococcus granulosus
/ immunology
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
/ methods
Female
Humans
Immunoassay
Italy
Male
Recombinant Proteins
/ immunology
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Serologic Tests
/ methods
Journal
PLoS neglected tropical diseases
ISSN: 1935-2735
Titre abrégé: PLoS Negl Trop Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101291488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2020
11 2020
Historique:
received:
12
12
2019
accepted:
14
10
2020
revised:
10
12
2020
pubmed:
1
12
2020
medline:
23
1
2021
entrez:
30
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is a neglected zoonotic disease caused by Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato. Diagnosis and monitoring of CE rely primarily on imaging while serology is used as a confirmatory test. However, imaging is not always conclusive and currently available serological assays have suboptimal sensitivity and specificity, lack standardization, and are not useful for patients´ follow-up. Seroassays for CE are usually based on hydatid fluid (HF), a complex, variable antigenic mixture, and cross-reactivity exists especially with alveolar echinococcosis. Recombinant proteins based on immunogenic antigens most abundant in HF, such as AgB1, AgB2 and Ag5, have been used to overcome these limitations. None of them so far showed potential to replace HF; however, their performance have been largely tested on a limited number of samples, and comparison of different antigens using the same cohort has been rarely performed. The combination of several immunogenic epitopes in a single recombinant protein could enhance test sensitivity. For the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with CE, we compared the performance of the crude HF, previously described recombinant 2B2t antigen, and GST-tagged version of 2B2t, and novel designed recombinants (GST-Ag5t and the GST-DIPOL chimera containing AgB1, AgBB2 and Ag5 epitopes) by IgG-ELISA format. Samples belong to a retrospective cohort of 253 well-characterized patients with CE, previously described for the evaluation of the 2B2t antigen, 92 patients with alveolar echinococcosis, and 82 healthy donors. The reference standard for CE diagnosis was the presence of a CE lesion as diagnosed by ultrasonography. The highest sensitivity was obtained with HF [86.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 81.2-91.0], followed by GST-2B2t (70.0%, 95% CI: 63.1-76.2), 2B2t (65.5%, 95% CI: 58.5-72.0), GST-Ag5t (64.5%, 95% CI: 57.5-71.1) and GST-DIPOL (63.1%, 95% CI: 56.0-69.7). The GST-2B2t had the best specificity (95.8%, 95% CI: 88.3-99.1) and the lowest cross-reactivity (38.7%, 95% CI: 27.6-50.6). Good response to treatment also correlated to negative test results in the GST-2B2t ELISA. While none of the tested recombinant antigen appears suitable to replace HF for the diagnosis of CE, GST-2B2t should be further explored as a confirmation test, based on its high specificity and low cross-reactivity, and for the follow-up after treatment in those patients with positive serology for this antigen.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33253168
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008892
pii: PNTD-D-19-02022
pmc: PMC7728171
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Helminth
0
Antigens, Helminth
0
Recombinant Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0008892Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Adv Parasitol. 2017;96:159-257
pubmed: 28212789
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Jan;94(1):166-71
pubmed: 26503271
Parasite Immunol. 1998 Feb;20(2):51-61
pubmed: 9572048
J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Nov;38(11):3979-83
pubmed: 11060055
Parasitology. 2007 Jun;134(Pt 6):911-20
pubmed: 17288631
Biochem J. 2003 Jan 1;369(Pt 1):191-8
pubmed: 12358601
Parasite Immunol. 1994 Feb;16(2):87-96
pubmed: 7517028
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Mar 29;10(3):e0004585
pubmed: 27023205
Vet Med Int. 2016;2016:2579345
pubmed: 26885439
Parasit Vectors. 2015 Jan 08;8:10
pubmed: 25566682
Protein Eng. 2002 Nov;15(11):871-9
pubmed: 12538906
Comput Biol Chem. 2007 Oct;31(5-6):389-92
pubmed: 17888742
J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Jun;43(6):2764-70
pubmed: 15956395
Parasitology. 2018 Oct;145(12):1594-1599
pubmed: 29587896
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 Mar;84(3):191-6
pubmed: 26658314
Exp Parasitol. 2001 Apr;97(4):215-25
pubmed: 11384165
Parasite Immunol. 2016 Mar;38(3):170-81
pubmed: 26683283
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2000 Jul;7(4):607-11
pubmed: 10882660
Virology. 1999 Jul 20;260(1):47-54
pubmed: 10405355
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008 Jan;15(1):147-53
pubmed: 17989342
Parasit Vectors. 2017 May 15;10(1):237
pubmed: 28506245
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(7):e1714
pubmed: 22802975
Parasitol Int. 2006;55 Suppl:S267-72
pubmed: 16403670
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2015 May;27(3):377-81
pubmed: 25943129
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(3):e1551
pubmed: 22413028
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:428205
pubmed: 26504805
Trends Parasitol. 2020 Jan;36(1):1-4
pubmed: 31753546
Infect Immun. 1997 Jul;65(7):2772-7
pubmed: 9199449
Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993 Jul;60(1):157-60
pubmed: 8366891
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013 Oct;65(10):1357-69
pubmed: 23026637
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019 Dec;101(6):1345-1349
pubmed: 31674293
Acta Trop. 2010 Apr;114(1):1-16
pubmed: 19931502
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Aug 10;4(8):e784
pubmed: 20706625
Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2009 Dec;168(2):168-71
pubmed: 19712705
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Sep 6;12(9):e0006741
pubmed: 30188936
BMC Microbiol. 2008 Dec 10;8:217
pubmed: 19077181
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 16;2(1):e000036
pubmed: 26462284
J Vet Med Sci. 2014 Jun;76(6):799-806
pubmed: 24492330
Adv Parasitol. 2017;96:259-369
pubmed: 28212790
J Biol Chem. 2003 May 30;278(22):20179-84
pubmed: 12660242
Trop Med Int Health. 2017 May;22(5):614-621
pubmed: 28218991
Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2000 Feb 5;105(2):177-84
pubmed: 10693741
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 25;14(7):e0219629
pubmed: 31344067