BACE inhibition causes rapid, regional, and non-progressive volume reduction in Alzheimer's disease brain.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Alzheimer Disease
/ diagnostic imaging
Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Amyloid beta-Peptides
/ metabolism
Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Brain
/ diagnostic imaging
Cyclic S-Oxides
/ therapeutic use
Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Double-Blind Method
Enzyme Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Female
Hippocampus
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Mental Status and Dementia Tests
Middle Aged
Neurofilament Proteins
/ cerebrospinal fluid
Positron-Emission Tomography
Thiadiazines
/ therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
White Matter
/ diagnostic imaging
Alzheimer’s disease
BACE
MRI
verubecestat
Journal
Brain : a journal of neurology
ISSN: 1460-2156
Titre abrégé: Brain
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372537
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 12 2020
01 12 2020
Historique:
received:
20
08
2019
revised:
22
07
2020
accepted:
10
08
2020
pubmed:
1
12
2020
medline:
2
3
2021
entrez:
30
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In the phase 3 EPOCH trial (Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01739348), treatment with the BACE inhibitor verubecestat failed to improve cognition in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease, but was associated with reduced hippocampal volume after 78 weeks as assessed by MRI. The aims of the present exploratory analyses were to: (i) characterize the effect of verubecestat on brain volume by evaluating the time course of volumetric MRI changes for a variety of brain regions; and (ii) understand the mechanism through which verubecestat might cause hippocampal (and other brain region) volume loss by assessing its relationship to measures of amyloid, neurodegeneration, and cognition. Participants were aged 55-85 years with probable Alzheimer's disease dementia and a Mini Mental State Examination score ≥15 and ≤26. MRIs were obtained at baseline and at Weeks 13, 26, 52 and 78 of treatment. MRIs were segmented using Freesurfer and analysed using a tensor-based morphometry method. PET amyloid data were obtained with 18F-flutemetamol (Vizamyl®) at baseline and Week 78. Standardized uptake value ratios were generated with subcortical white matter as a reference region. Neurofilament light chain in the CSF was assessed as a biomarker of neurodegeneration. Compared with placebo, verubecestat showed increased MRI brain volume loss at Week 13 with no evidence of additional loss through Week 78. The verubecestat-related volumetric MRI loss occurred predominantly in amyloid-rich brain regions. Correlations between amyloid burden at baseline and verubecestat-related volumetric MRI reductions were not significant (r = 0.05 to 0.26, P-values > 0.27). There were no significant differences between verubecestat and placebo in changes from baseline in CSF levels of neurofilament light chain at Week 78 (increases of 7.2 and 14.6 pg/ml for verubecestat versus 19.7 pg/ml for placebo, P-values ≥ 0.1). There was a moderate correlation between volumetric MRI changes and cognitive decline in all groups including placebo at Week 78 (e.g. r = -0.45 to -0.55, P < 0.001 for whole brain), but the correlations were smaller at Week 13 and significant only for the verubecestat groups (e.g. r = -0.15 and -0.11, P < 0.04 for whole brain). Our results suggest that the verubecestat-associated MRI brain volume loss is not due to generalized, progressive neurodegeneration, but may be mediated by specific effects on BACE-related amyloid processes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33253354
pii: 6012787
doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa332
pmc: PMC8453290
doi:
Substances chimiques
Amyloid beta-Peptides
0
Cyclic S-Oxides
0
Enzyme Inhibitors
0
Neurofilament Proteins
0
Thiadiazines
0
Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases
EC 3.4.-
Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases
EC 3.4.23.-
BACE1 protein, human
EC 3.4.23.46
verubecestat
J1I0P6WT7T
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01739348']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3816-3826Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P20 AG068053
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : U01 NS093334
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : P20 GM109025
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG053798
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG019610
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) (2020). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Neurology. 2005 May 10;64(9):1563-72
pubmed: 15883317
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
pubmed: 1202204
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Jun;15(7):673-684
pubmed: 27068280
J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;49(4):1123-34
pubmed: 26639957
Brain. 2015 Dec;138(Pt 12):3747-59
pubmed: 26428666
Cereb Cortex. 2004 Jan;14(1):11-22
pubmed: 14654453
J Neurosci. 2007 Apr 4;27(14):3639-49
pubmed: 17409228
Neurology. 2011 Sep 27;77(13):1263-71
pubmed: 21917762
Neurology. 2015 Oct 20;85(16):1383-91
pubmed: 26362286
Neuron. 2002 Jan 31;33(3):341-55
pubmed: 11832223
Mol Cell Neurosci. 2015 May;66(Pt B):114-22
pubmed: 25770439
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 3;378(18):1691-1703
pubmed: 29719179
Lancet Neurol. 2012 Mar;11(3):241-9
pubmed: 22305802
Sci Transl Med. 2016 Nov 2;8(363):363ra150
pubmed: 27807285
Am J Psychiatry. 1984 Nov;141(11):1356-64
pubmed: 6496779
Alzheimers Dement. 2017 May;13(5):499-509
pubmed: 27693189
Ann Neurol. 2014 Aug;76(2):223-30
pubmed: 24852682
Neurology. 1984 Jul;34(7):939-44
pubmed: 6610841
N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 11;380(15):1408-1420
pubmed: 30970186
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Mar;13(3):319-29
pubmed: 24556009
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Nov 1;76(11):1319-1329
pubmed: 31314895
Neurochem Int. 2007 Jul-Sep;51(2-4):105-11
pubmed: 17586089