Comparison of Methods for Measuring Cyclodeviation.
Journal
American journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1879-1891
Titre abrégé: Am J Ophthalmol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370500
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2021
04 2021
Historique:
received:
21
09
2020
revised:
12
11
2020
accepted:
13
11
2020
pubmed:
1
12
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
entrez:
30
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare the double-Maddox rod test with other methods of measuring cyclodeviation DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. We retrospectively identified 153 adults in a clinical practice with cyclodeviation assessed using double-Maddox rods, of whom 105 were also assessed using fusible synoptophore targets, 73 using nonfusible synoptophore targets, 118 using single-Maddox rod, and 43 using fundus photography. Relationships between double-Maddox rod and other tests were evaluated by calculating mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and Bland-Altman plots with linear regression. Synoptophore cross-in-circle targets and the largest (of right or left) single-Maddox rod values were similar to double-Maddox values (mean differences: -1.2° and 0.1°, respectively; ICC: 0.79 and 0.82, respectively). Synoptophore house targets measured less excyclodeviation (mean difference: -2.7°; ICC: 0.71). Mean summed single-Maddox rod values were somewhat similar to double-Maddox values (mean difference: 1.5°; ICC: 0.85), but differences increased with greater cyclodeviation (r There was good agreement between double-Maddox and the largest single- Maddox test values and synoptophore cross-in-circle targets but poorer agreement with other tests. Further study is needed to understand which measurements best reflect true cyclodeviation and relationships with symptoms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33253661
pii: S0002-9394(20)30634-6
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.11.005
pmc: PMC8213196
mid: NIHMS1650143
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
332-342Subventions
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : R01 EY024333
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 EY011751
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Br J Ophthalmol. 2011 Nov;95(11):1583-7
pubmed: 21427460
Am Orthopt J. 2006;56:157-65
pubmed: 21149144
Acta Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;98(2):177-181
pubmed: 31352686
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;27(1):39-43
pubmed: 23372378
Am J Ophthalmol. 1983 Aug;96(2):229-37
pubmed: 6881246
Ophthalmology. 1994 Dec;101(12):1897-901
pubmed: 7997325
J Neuroophthalmol. 2014 Dec;34(4):362-5
pubmed: 24944006
Strabismus. 2016;24(1):28-36
pubmed: 26963755
Ophthalmology. 2009 Oct;116(10):2001-10
pubmed: 19592099
J AAPOS. 2018 Apr;22(2):146-148.e1
pubmed: 29317291
Ophthalmology. 1982 Jan;89(1):58-62
pubmed: 7070775