Cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived left ventricular mechanics-strain, cardiac power and end-systolic elastance under various inotropic states in swine.
Animals
Biomechanical Phenomena
Calcium Channel Blockers
/ pharmacology
Cardiotonic Agents
/ pharmacology
Female
Heart Ventricles
/ diagnostic imaging
Hemodynamics
/ drug effects
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine
Predictive Value of Tests
Sus scrofa
Systole
Time Factors
Ventricular Function, Left
/ drug effects
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance
Contractile function
Feature tracking
Hemodynamics
Left ventricular strain
Porcine model
Translational studies
Journal
Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
ISSN: 1532-429X
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9815616
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 11 2020
30 11 2020
Historique:
received:
17
11
2019
accepted:
06
10
2020
entrez:
1
12
2020
pubmed:
2
12
2020
medline:
6
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) strain imaging is an established technique to quantify myocardial deformation. However, to what extent left ventricular (LV) systolic strain, and therefore LV mechanics, reflects classical hemodynamic parameters under various inotropic states is still not completely clear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the correlation of LV global strain parameters measured via CMR feature tracking (CMR-FT, based on conventional cine balanced steady state free precession (bSSFP) images) with hemodynamic parameters such as cardiac index (CI), cardiac power output (CPO) and end-systolic elastance (Ees) under various inotropic states. Ten anaesthetized, healthy Landrace swine were acutely instrumented closed-chest and transported to the CMR facility for measurements. After baseline measurements, two steps were performed: (1) dobutamine-stress (Dobutamine) and (2) verapamil-induced cardiovascular depression (Verapamil). During each protocol, CMR images were acquired in the short axisand apical 2Ch, 3Ch and 4Ch views. MEDIS software was utilized to analyze global longitudinal (GLS), global circumferential (GCS), and global radial strain (GRS). Dobutamine significantly increased heart rate, CI, CPO and Ees, while Verapamil decreased them. Absolute values of GLS, GCS and GRS accordingly increased during Dobutamine infusion, while GLS and GCS decreased during Verapamil. Linear regression analysis showed a moderate correlation between GLS, GCS and LV hemodynamic parameters, while GRS correlated poorly. Indexing global strain parameters for indirect measures of afterload, such as mean aortic pressure or wall stress, significantly improved these correlations, with GLS indexed for wall stress reflecting LV contractility as the clinically widespread LV ejection fraction. GLS and GCS correlate accordingly with LV hemodynamics under various inotropic states in swine. Indexing strain parameters for indirect measures of afterload substantially improves this correlation, with GLS being as good as LV ejection fraction in reflecting LV contractility. CMR-FT-strain imaging may be a quick and promising tool to characterize LV hemodynamics in patients with varying degrees of LV dysfunction.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) strain imaging is an established technique to quantify myocardial deformation. However, to what extent left ventricular (LV) systolic strain, and therefore LV mechanics, reflects classical hemodynamic parameters under various inotropic states is still not completely clear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the correlation of LV global strain parameters measured via CMR feature tracking (CMR-FT, based on conventional cine balanced steady state free precession (bSSFP) images) with hemodynamic parameters such as cardiac index (CI), cardiac power output (CPO) and end-systolic elastance (Ees) under various inotropic states.
METHODS
Ten anaesthetized, healthy Landrace swine were acutely instrumented closed-chest and transported to the CMR facility for measurements. After baseline measurements, two steps were performed: (1) dobutamine-stress (Dobutamine) and (2) verapamil-induced cardiovascular depression (Verapamil). During each protocol, CMR images were acquired in the short axisand apical 2Ch, 3Ch and 4Ch views. MEDIS software was utilized to analyze global longitudinal (GLS), global circumferential (GCS), and global radial strain (GRS).
RESULTS
Dobutamine significantly increased heart rate, CI, CPO and Ees, while Verapamil decreased them. Absolute values of GLS, GCS and GRS accordingly increased during Dobutamine infusion, while GLS and GCS decreased during Verapamil. Linear regression analysis showed a moderate correlation between GLS, GCS and LV hemodynamic parameters, while GRS correlated poorly. Indexing global strain parameters for indirect measures of afterload, such as mean aortic pressure or wall stress, significantly improved these correlations, with GLS indexed for wall stress reflecting LV contractility as the clinically widespread LV ejection fraction.
CONCLUSION
GLS and GCS correlate accordingly with LV hemodynamics under various inotropic states in swine. Indexing strain parameters for indirect measures of afterload substantially improves this correlation, with GLS being as good as LV ejection fraction in reflecting LV contractility. CMR-FT-strain imaging may be a quick and promising tool to characterize LV hemodynamics in patients with varying degrees of LV dysfunction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33256761
doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00679-z
pii: 10.1186/s12968-020-00679-z
pmc: PMC7708216
doi:
Substances chimiques
Calcium Channel Blockers
0
Cardiotonic Agents
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
79Références
Eur Heart J. 2001 Aug;22(16):1496-503
pubmed: 11482923
Crit Care Med. 2016 Mar;44(3):e158-67
pubmed: 26474110
Eur Radiol. 2018 Dec;28(12):5137-5147
pubmed: 29872912
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):217
pubmed: 31615415
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2003 May;18(3):215-22
pubmed: 12826823
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002 May;15(5):416-24
pubmed: 12019424
Circulation. 1992 Aug;86(2):513-21
pubmed: 1638719
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 May;28(5):587-96
pubmed: 25577185
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Apr;89:97-105
pubmed: 28267556
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Apr;39(4):887-94
pubmed: 24006100
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Jun;28(6):667-73
pubmed: 25770665
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012 Jul 28;14:51
pubmed: 22839436
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Dec;12(1):e008493
pubmed: 30630347
Circulation. 1988 Jun;77(6):1203-12
pubmed: 3286035
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Feb 19;41(4):611-7
pubmed: 12598073
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 May 01;15:35
pubmed: 23634753
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014 May;27(5):512-9
pubmed: 24612899
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Oct;11(10):1419-1429
pubmed: 29361479
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003 Mar;16(3):233-9
pubmed: 12618731
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jun 1;20(6):605-619
pubmed: 30903139
Echo Res Pract. 2016 Mar;3(1):17-24
pubmed: 27249810
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 22;70(8):942-954
pubmed: 28818204
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;8(3):235-45
pubmed: 25682511
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jul 21;44(2):340-8
pubmed: 15261929
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Oct;11(10):1433-1444
pubmed: 29454776
J Physiol. 2012 Oct 15;590(20):5141-50
pubmed: 22890704
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Sep;2(5):356-64
pubmed: 19808623
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Sep 18;60(12):1086-93
pubmed: 22939559
Am Heart J. 2009 Nov;158(5):836-44
pubmed: 19853706
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Feb;16(2):217-24
pubmed: 25552469
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Apr;36(4):703-712
pubmed: 31950298
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014 Oct 01;16:72
pubmed: 25316531
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013 Feb;26(2):185-91
pubmed: 23218891
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Apr;9(4):e004077
pubmed: 27009468
Circulation. 1982 Jan;65(1):99-108
pubmed: 7053293
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Dec;32(12):1707-1714
pubmed: 27535041
Radiology. 2019 Feb;290(2):329-337
pubmed: 30457480
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Nov;10(11):
pubmed: 29138231
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Sep 27;58(14):1401-13
pubmed: 21939821
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Sep;45(3):880-95
pubmed: 23344734
Heart Fail Rev. 2017 Jul;22(4):465-476
pubmed: 28620745
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Feb 11;63(5):447-56
pubmed: 24184245
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jan;7(1):164-72
pubmed: 24173273
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Sep 18;60(12):1067-76
pubmed: 22883634