FRAGILE: FRench Attitude reGistry in case of ICD LEad replacement.
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead
Lead extraction
Lead failure
Registry
Journal
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
ISSN: 1532-2092
Titre abrégé: Europace
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883649
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 03 2021
08 03 2021
Historique:
received:
07
04
2020
accepted:
09
09
2020
pubmed:
2
12
2020
medline:
10
8
2021
entrez:
1
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
FRench Attitude reGistry in case of ICD LEad replacement (FRAGILE) registry was set-up to describe the attitude in different French institutions in case of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead replacement, extraction, or abandonment and to compare outcomes in both groups. Prospective observational study comparing two attitudes in case of ICD lead replacement, extraction, or abandonment. Primary endpoint describes the attitude in different French centres, collect parameters that may influence the decision. Secondary endpoint compares early and mid-term (2 years) complications in both groups.Between April 2013 and April 2017, 552 patients were included in 32 centres. 434 (78.6%) were male, mean patient's age was 60.3 ± 14.4 years. In 56.9% of the cases, the decision was to explant the lead. Patients in the extraction group were younger than in the abandonment group (56.7 ± 14.5 vs. 65 ± 12.7 P < 0.0001) and less likely to have comorbidities (46.5% vs. 58.3% of the patients P = 0.022). The mean lead dwelling time was significantly longer in the abandonment group as compared with the extraction group (7.6 ± 3.9 vs. 5.2 ± 3.1 years, P < 0.0001). There was no statistical difference between both groups concerning early and 2 years complications. In this registry, the strategy in case of non-infected ICD lead replacement was mainly influenced by patient's age and comorbidities and lead dwelling time. No difference was observed in outcomes in both strategies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33257986
pii: 6012930
doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa290
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
389-394Informations de copyright
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.