Harmonized definition of occupational burnout: A systematic review, semantic analysis, and Delphi consensus in 29 countries.
Journal
Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health
ISSN: 1795-990X
Titre abrégé: Scand J Work Environ Health
Pays: Finland
ID NLM: 7511540
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2021
01 03 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
2
12
2020
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
1
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Objective A consensual definition of occupational burnout is currently lacking. We aimed to harmonize the definition of occupational burnout as a health outcome in medical research and reach a consensus on this definition within the Network on the Coordination and Harmonisation of European Occupational Cohorts (OMEGA-NET). Methods First, we performed a systematic review in MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Embase (January 1990 to August 2018) and a semantic analysis of the available definitions. We used the definitions of burnout and burnout-related concepts from the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT) to formulate a consistent harmonized definition of the concept. Second, we sought to obtain the Delphi consensus on the proposed definition. Results We identified 88 unique definitions of burnout and assigned each of them to 1 of the 11 original definitions. The semantic analysis yielded a first proposal, further reformulated according to SNOMED-CT and the panelists` comments as follows: "In a worker, occupational burnout or occupational physical AND emotional exhaustion state is an exhaustion due to prolonged exposure to work-related problems". A panel of 50 experts (researchers and healthcare professionals with an interest for occupational burnout) reached consensus on this proposal at the second round of the Delphi, with 82% of experts agreeing on it. Conclusion This study resulted in a harmonized definition of occupational burnout approved by experts from 29 countries within OMEGA-NET. Future research should address the reproducibility of the Delphi consensus in a larger panel of experts, representing more countries, and examine the practicability of the definition.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33258478
pii: 3935
doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3935
pmc: PMC8114565
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
95-107Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Ind Health. 2019 Nov 29;57(6):745-752
pubmed: 30814391
J Crit Care. 2010 Jun;25(2):364.e1-9
pubmed: 19836194
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;225:683-5
pubmed: 27332304
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 12;13(11):e0206840
pubmed: 30418984
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Jun;86(3):499-512
pubmed: 11419809
Assessment. 2020 Mar 10;:1073191120911095
pubmed: 32153199
JAMA. 2018 Sep 18;320(11):1131-1150
pubmed: 30326495
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Oct;41(2):95-105
pubmed: 21420149
Lancet. 2019 Jul 13;394(10193):93
pubmed: 31305255
J Clin Psychol. 2020 Apr;76(4):801-821
pubmed: 31926025
Ann Intern Med. 2001 Jul 17;135(2):145-8
pubmed: 11453722
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 25;13(4):e0195039
pubmed: 29694375
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Jun;38(3):655-62
pubmed: 26846316
BMC Public Health. 2017 Mar 16;17(1):264
pubmed: 28302088
Behav Med. 1992 Summer;18(2):53-60
pubmed: 1392214
Epidemiol Prev. 2017 Sep-Dec;41(5-6):294-298
pubmed: 29119764
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;49(10):887-97
pubmed: 26296368
Occup Environ Med. 2018 Jul;75(7):475-476
pubmed: 29735748
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;67(4):401-9
pubmed: 24581294