Usage and Acceptability of the iBobbly App: Pilot Trial for Suicide Prevention in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Youth.
Aboriginal
First Nations
Indigenous
apps
depression
eHealth
mHealth
mental health
suicide
suicide ideation
Journal
JMIR mental health
ISSN: 2368-7959
Titre abrégé: JMIR Ment Health
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101658926
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Dec 2020
01 Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
06
04
2019
accepted:
01
11
2019
revised:
01
11
2019
entrez:
1
12
2020
pubmed:
2
12
2020
medline:
2
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The proliferation of mental health apps purporting to target and improve psychological wellbeing is ever-growing and also concerning: Few apps have been rigorously evaluated, and, indeed, the safety of the vast majority of them has not been determined. Over 10,000 self-help apps exist but most are not used much after being downloaded. Gathering and analyzing usage data and the acceptability of apps are critical to inform consumers, researchers, and app developers. This paper presents pilot usage and acceptability data from the iBobbly suicide prevention app, an app distributed through a randomized controlled trial. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participants from the Kimberley region of Western Australia completed a survey measuring their technology use in general (n=13), and data on their experiences with and views of the iBobbly app were also collected in semistructured interviews (n=13) and thematically analyzed. Finally, engagement with the app, such as the number of sessions completed and time spent on various acceptance-based therapeutic activities, was analyzed (n=18). Both groups were participants in the iBobbly app pilot randomized controlled trial (n=61) completed in 2015. Regression analysis indicated that app use improved psychological outcomes, although only minimally, and effects were not significant. However, results of the thematic analysis indicated that the iBobbly app was deemed effective, acceptable, and culturally appropriate by those interviewed. There is a scarcity of randomized controlled trials and eHealth interventions in Indigenous communities, while extremely high rates of psychological distress and suicide persist. In this environment, studies that can add evidence from mixed-methods approaches are important. While the regression analysis in this study did not indicate a significant effect of app use on psychological wellbeing, this was predictable considering the small sample size (n=18) and typically brief app use. The results on engagement with the iBobbly app were however positive. This study showed that Indigenous youth are early and frequent users of technology in general, and they regarded the iBobbly app to be culturally safe and of therapeutic value. Qualitative analyses demonstrated that iBobbly app use was associated with self-reported improvements in psychological wellbeing, mental health literacy, and reductions in shame. Importantly, participants reported that they would recommend other similar apps if available to their peers.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The proliferation of mental health apps purporting to target and improve psychological wellbeing is ever-growing and also concerning: Few apps have been rigorously evaluated, and, indeed, the safety of the vast majority of them has not been determined. Over 10,000 self-help apps exist but most are not used much after being downloaded. Gathering and analyzing usage data and the acceptability of apps are critical to inform consumers, researchers, and app developers.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This paper presents pilot usage and acceptability data from the iBobbly suicide prevention app, an app distributed through a randomized controlled trial.
METHODS
METHODS
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participants from the Kimberley region of Western Australia completed a survey measuring their technology use in general (n=13), and data on their experiences with and views of the iBobbly app were also collected in semistructured interviews (n=13) and thematically analyzed. Finally, engagement with the app, such as the number of sessions completed and time spent on various acceptance-based therapeutic activities, was analyzed (n=18). Both groups were participants in the iBobbly app pilot randomized controlled trial (n=61) completed in 2015.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Regression analysis indicated that app use improved psychological outcomes, although only minimally, and effects were not significant. However, results of the thematic analysis indicated that the iBobbly app was deemed effective, acceptable, and culturally appropriate by those interviewed.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
There is a scarcity of randomized controlled trials and eHealth interventions in Indigenous communities, while extremely high rates of psychological distress and suicide persist. In this environment, studies that can add evidence from mixed-methods approaches are important. While the regression analysis in this study did not indicate a significant effect of app use on psychological wellbeing, this was predictable considering the small sample size (n=18) and typically brief app use. The results on engagement with the iBobbly app were however positive. This study showed that Indigenous youth are early and frequent users of technology in general, and they regarded the iBobbly app to be culturally safe and of therapeutic value. Qualitative analyses demonstrated that iBobbly app use was associated with self-reported improvements in psychological wellbeing, mental health literacy, and reductions in shame. Importantly, participants reported that they would recommend other similar apps if available to their peers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33258782
pii: v7i12e14296
doi: 10.2196/14296
pmc: PMC7738247
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e14296Informations de copyright
©Joseph Tighe, Fiona Shand, Kathy McKay, Taylor-Jai Mcalister, Andrew Mackinnon, Helen Christensen. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 01.12.2020.
Références
Evid Based Ment Health. 2018 Aug;21(3):116-119
pubmed: 29871870
JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Feb 23;5(1):e16
pubmed: 29475823
J Med Internet Res. 2009 Apr 24;11(2):e13
pubmed: 19403466
World Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;16(3):287-298
pubmed: 28941113
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2010 Apr;19(2):75-82
pubmed: 20367644
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 11;18(3):e65
pubmed: 26969043
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 26;14:517
pubmed: 25343849
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 27;7(1):e013518
pubmed: 28132007
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Nov 15;15(11):e247
pubmed: 24240579
Med J Aust. 2002 May 20;176(10):466-70
pubmed: 12065009
Lancet. 2009 Jul 4;374(9683):76-85
pubmed: 19577696
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760
pubmed: 26613970