Qualitative evidence synthesis of values and preferences to inform infant feeding in the context of non-HIV transmission risk.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 11 09 2020
accepted: 06 11 2020
entrez: 1 12 2020
pubmed: 2 12 2020
medline: 15 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Breastfeeding is recommended by many organisations, but feeding choices can take on complexity against a backdrop of a transmissible infection risk. The aim of this synthesis is to explore what is known about the values and preferences of pregnant women, mothers, family members and health practitioners, policy makers and providers (midwives) concerning feeding when there is a risk of Mother-to-Child transmission [MTCT] of an infectious disease (other than HIV/AIDS) to infants (0-2 years of age). A qualitative evidence synthesis and GRADE CERQual assessment of relevant studies of values and preferences regarding infant feeding options in the context of non-HIV MTCT risk. The synthesis included eight qualitative studies. Four studies focussed on human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1), three studies on Ebola, and one study on influenza vaccination. Mothers reported feeling sadness and guilt at not breastfeeding, while recognising that it was important for the health of their baby not to breastfeed. Mothers were reportedly appreciative of the provision of appropriate facilities, and the advice of those health professionals who knew about the diseases, but felt other professionals lacked knowledge about the transmission risk of conditions such as HTLV-1. All groups expressed concerns about social perceptions of not breastfeeding, as well as the alternatives. The evidence was coherent and relevant, but there were serious concerns about adequacy and methodological limitations, such as potential social desirability bias in some studies. This synthesis describes the reported values and preferences of pregnant women, mothers, and others concerning feeding when there is a risk of Mother-to-Child transmission (MTCT) of an infectious disease (other than HIV/AIDS) to an infant when breastfeeding. However, the evidence in the peer-reviewed literature is limited both in quality and quantity.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Breastfeeding is recommended by many organisations, but feeding choices can take on complexity against a backdrop of a transmissible infection risk. The aim of this synthesis is to explore what is known about the values and preferences of pregnant women, mothers, family members and health practitioners, policy makers and providers (midwives) concerning feeding when there is a risk of Mother-to-Child transmission [MTCT] of an infectious disease (other than HIV/AIDS) to infants (0-2 years of age).
METHODS
A qualitative evidence synthesis and GRADE CERQual assessment of relevant studies of values and preferences regarding infant feeding options in the context of non-HIV MTCT risk.
RESULTS
The synthesis included eight qualitative studies. Four studies focussed on human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1), three studies on Ebola, and one study on influenza vaccination. Mothers reported feeling sadness and guilt at not breastfeeding, while recognising that it was important for the health of their baby not to breastfeed. Mothers were reportedly appreciative of the provision of appropriate facilities, and the advice of those health professionals who knew about the diseases, but felt other professionals lacked knowledge about the transmission risk of conditions such as HTLV-1. All groups expressed concerns about social perceptions of not breastfeeding, as well as the alternatives. The evidence was coherent and relevant, but there were serious concerns about adequacy and methodological limitations, such as potential social desirability bias in some studies.
CONCLUSIONS
This synthesis describes the reported values and preferences of pregnant women, mothers, and others concerning feeding when there is a risk of Mother-to-Child transmission (MTCT) of an infectious disease (other than HIV/AIDS) to an infant when breastfeeding. However, the evidence in the peer-reviewed literature is limited both in quality and quantity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33259512
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242669
pii: PONE-D-20-28562
pmc: PMC7707527
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0242669

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2018 Apr;30(4):208-235
pubmed: 29757789
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004 Nov-Dec;33(6):692-703
pubmed: 15561657
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Aug 30;15(1):126
pubmed: 28851437
Vaccine. 2016 Jun 8;34(27):3207-3213
pubmed: 26776467
Syst Rev. 2016 May 04;5:74
pubmed: 27145932
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Nov;63(3):279-91
pubmed: 16982168
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):e1-34
pubmed: 19631507
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2017 Nov 30;41:e114
pubmed: 31391827
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 23;13(8):e0202468
pubmed: 30138407
Front Microbiol. 2019 May 08;10:999
pubmed: 31134031
Curr HIV Res. 2013 Mar;11(2):169-77
pubmed: 23432492
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Mar 16;11:29
pubmed: 21410933
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 May;97:39-48
pubmed: 29248725
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 13;13:37
pubmed: 23497061
Int J MCH AIDS. 2013;2(1):153-62
pubmed: 27621968
Qual Health Res. 2016 Aug;26(10):1307-17
pubmed: 27117960
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Nov 27;12:181
pubmed: 23185978
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2013 Jul-Sep;28(3):257-68
pubmed: 22945334
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jul 30;14:771
pubmed: 25079673
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Sep 10;13(9):e0007645
pubmed: 31504036
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Mar 1;34(2):83-91
pubmed: 30753437
Qual Health Res. 2013 Jan;23(1):126-41
pubmed: 23166156
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Nov;24(11):700-8
pubmed: 26306609
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006 Aug;100(8):715-8
pubmed: 16481017
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 14;19(1):570
pubmed: 31088541
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000 Nov;918:128-35
pubmed: 11131696
Matern Child Health J. 2018 Aug;22(8):1208-1216
pubmed: 29500784
Glob Health Action. 2016 Mar 11;9:30201
pubmed: 26976265
Cad Saude Publica. 2019 Nov 11;35(11):e00005419
pubmed: 31721899
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Jan 2;63(51):1226-7
pubmed: 25551595
AIDS Care. 2014 Feb;26(2):214-25
pubmed: 23879637

Auteurs

Christopher Carroll (C)

Health Economics & Decision Science Section, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Andrew Booth (A)

Health Economics & Decision Science Section, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Fiona Campbell (F)

Health Economics & Decision Science Section, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Clare Relton (C)

Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH