DA-REPOCH Versus R-CHOP for the Treatment of Activated B-Cell Subtype Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Community Center Experience.

chop dlbcl epoch lymphoma non-hodgkin

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Nov 2020
Historique:
entrez: 3 12 2020
pubmed: 4 12 2020
medline: 4 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) represents around one quarter of non-Hodgkin lymphomas in both the United States and globally. The activated B-cell (ABC) subtype of DLBCL is associated with higher relapse rates and a worse prognosis when treated with standard regimens in comparison to other subtypes of DLBCL. Recent studies have demonstrated a potential benefit with combination of dose-adjusted rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin (DA-REPOCH) in comparison to standard combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) in ABC DLBCL patients. We aimed to see if there was any benefit on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in a pooled patient population from a community oncology practice with the use of DA-REPOCH in ABC DLBCL. Our study did not reveal a statistically significant advantage in either PFS or OS with DA-REPOCH; however, a smaller percentage or patients progressed or relapsed when treated with DA-REPOCH. While the toxicity profile was similar, a higher percentage of patients receiving R-CHOP experienced grade 3 or higher toxicities. A prospective trial of R-CHOP versus DA-REPOCH in patients with the ABC subtype of DLBCL is warranted to further determine a potential benefit to DA-REPOCH in this patient population.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33269174
doi: 10.7759/cureus.11714
pmc: PMC7704021
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e11714

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020, Knouse et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Cancer Treat Res. 1993;66:53-63
pubmed: 8102863
N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 24;346(4):235-42
pubmed: 11807147
N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 8;328(14):1002-6
pubmed: 7680764
Am J Hematol. 2019 May;94(5):604-616
pubmed: 30859597
Blood. 2011 May 5;117(18):4836-43
pubmed: 21441466
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep 10;33(26):2848-56
pubmed: 26240231
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Jan 15;19(2):389-97
pubmed: 11208830
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jul 20;37(21):1790-1799
pubmed: 30939090

Auteurs

Phillip Knouse (P)

Hematology and Medical Oncology, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, USA.

Edward Nabrinsky (E)

Internal Medicine, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, USA.

Ronald L Sirota (RL)

Pathology, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, USA.

David Hakimian (D)

Hematology and Medical Oncology, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, USA.

Jacob Bitran (J)

Hematology and Medical Oncology, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, USA.

Classifications MeSH