Patient Interaction Phenotypes With an Automated Remote Hypertension Monitoring Program and Their Association With Blood Pressure Control: Observational Study.


Journal

Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 12 2020
Historique:
received: 17 07 2020
accepted: 24 10 2020
revised: 12 10 2020
entrez: 3 12 2020
pubmed: 4 12 2020
medline: 16 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Automated texting platforms have emerged as a tool to facilitate communication between patients and health care providers with variable effects on achieving target blood pressure (BP). Understanding differences in the way patients interact with these communication platforms can inform their use and design for hypertension management. Our primary aim was to explore the unique phenotypes of patient interactions with an automated text messaging platform for BP monitoring. Our secondary aim was to estimate associations between interaction phenotypes and BP control. This study was a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial for adults with poorly controlled hypertension. A total of 201 patients with established primary care were assigned to the automated texting platform; messages exchanged throughout the 4-month program were analyzed. We used the k-means clustering algorithm to characterize two different interaction phenotypes: program conformity and engagement style. First, we identified unique clusters signifying differences in program conformity based on the frequency over time of error alerts, which were generated to patients when they deviated from the requested text message format (eg, ###/## for BP). Second, we explored overall engagement styles, defined by error alerts and responsiveness to text prompts, unprompted messages, and word count averages. Finally, we applied the chi-square test to identify associations between each interaction phenotype and achieving the target BP. We observed 3 categories of program conformity based on their frequency of error alerts: those who immediately and consistently submitted texts without system errors (perfect users, 51/201), those who did so after an initial learning period (adaptive users, 66/201), and those who consistently submitted messages generating errors to the platform (nonadaptive users, 38/201). Next, we observed 3 categories of engagement style: the enthusiast, who tended to submit unprompted messages with high word counts (17/155); the student, who inconsistently engaged (35/155); and the minimalist, who engaged only when prompted (103/155). Of all 6 phenotypes, we observed a statistically significant association between patients demonstrating the minimalist communication style (high adherence, few unprompted messages, limited information sharing) and achieving target BP (P<.001). We identified unique interaction phenotypes among patients engaging with an automated text message platform for remote BP monitoring. Only the minimalist communication style was associated with achieving target BP. Identifying and understanding interaction phenotypes may be useful for tailoring future automated texting interactions and designing future interventions to achieve better BP control.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Automated texting platforms have emerged as a tool to facilitate communication between patients and health care providers with variable effects on achieving target blood pressure (BP). Understanding differences in the way patients interact with these communication platforms can inform their use and design for hypertension management.
OBJECTIVE
Our primary aim was to explore the unique phenotypes of patient interactions with an automated text messaging platform for BP monitoring. Our secondary aim was to estimate associations between interaction phenotypes and BP control.
METHODS
This study was a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial for adults with poorly controlled hypertension. A total of 201 patients with established primary care were assigned to the automated texting platform; messages exchanged throughout the 4-month program were analyzed. We used the k-means clustering algorithm to characterize two different interaction phenotypes: program conformity and engagement style. First, we identified unique clusters signifying differences in program conformity based on the frequency over time of error alerts, which were generated to patients when they deviated from the requested text message format (eg, ###/## for BP). Second, we explored overall engagement styles, defined by error alerts and responsiveness to text prompts, unprompted messages, and word count averages. Finally, we applied the chi-square test to identify associations between each interaction phenotype and achieving the target BP.
RESULTS
We observed 3 categories of program conformity based on their frequency of error alerts: those who immediately and consistently submitted texts without system errors (perfect users, 51/201), those who did so after an initial learning period (adaptive users, 66/201), and those who consistently submitted messages generating errors to the platform (nonadaptive users, 38/201). Next, we observed 3 categories of engagement style: the enthusiast, who tended to submit unprompted messages with high word counts (17/155); the student, who inconsistently engaged (35/155); and the minimalist, who engaged only when prompted (103/155). Of all 6 phenotypes, we observed a statistically significant association between patients demonstrating the minimalist communication style (high adherence, few unprompted messages, limited information sharing) and achieving target BP (P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS
We identified unique interaction phenotypes among patients engaging with an automated text message platform for remote BP monitoring. Only the minimalist communication style was associated with achieving target BP. Identifying and understanding interaction phenotypes may be useful for tailoring future automated texting interactions and designing future interventions to achieve better BP control.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33270032
pii: v22i12e22493
doi: 10.2196/22493
pmc: PMC7746494
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e22493

Subventions

Organisme : AHRQ HHS
ID : K12 HS026372
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG034546
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

©Anahita Davoudi, Natalie S Lee, Corey Chivers, Timothy Delaney, Elizabeth L Asch, Catherine Reitz, Shivan J Mehta, Krisda H Chaiyachati, Danielle L Mowery. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 03.12.2020.

Références

Hypertension. 2020 Feb;75(2):285-292
pubmed: 31865786
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Feb 01;5(2):e9
pubmed: 28148474
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Mar;176(3):340-9
pubmed: 26831740
Med Clin North Am. 2017 Jan;101(1):229-245
pubmed: 27884232
JAMA. 2018 May 22;319(20):2075-2076
pubmed: 29710244
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 14;7(1):e12228
pubmed: 31344667
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2016 Oct 1;2(4):237-244
pubmed: 29474713
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Mar;52(3):391-402
pubmed: 28073656
Tex Heart Inst J. 2015 Jun 01;42(3):226-8
pubmed: 26175633
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Feb 3;7(2):e15801
pubmed: 31909720
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547
Health Educ Behav. 2019 Dec;46(6):942-946
pubmed: 31431077
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 24;19(8):e296
pubmed: 28838885
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 09;21(4):e12541
pubmed: 30964439
BMJ. 2004 Jul 17;329(7458):145
pubmed: 15194600
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;221(3):283-285
pubmed: 31121137
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2015 May;9(5):375-81
pubmed: 25771023
Trop Med Int Health. 2015 Aug;20(8):1003-14
pubmed: 25881735
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Aug 29;7(8):e14250
pubmed: 31469083
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Mar 1;45(3):234-239
pubmed: 27955945
Am J Med. 2018 Sep;131(9):1125.e1-1125.e8
pubmed: 29806998
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Dec 9;7(12):e12639
pubmed: 31815678
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Nov;34(11):2397-2404
pubmed: 31396815
Circulation. 2016 Feb 9;133(6):592-600
pubmed: 26769742
Am Fam Physician. 2014 Oct 1;90(7):503-4
pubmed: 25369633
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 May;26(5):517-527
pubmed: 30659702
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 22;10:CD006611
pubmed: 31638271
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 May-Jun;14(3):269-77
pubmed: 17329725

Auteurs

Anahita Davoudi (A)

Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Natalie S Lee (NS)

National Clinician Scholars Program, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Corporal Michael J Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Corey Chivers (C)

Penn Medicine Predictive Healthcare, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Timothy Delaney (T)

Center for Healthcare Innovation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Elizabeth L Asch (EL)

Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Catherine Reitz (C)

Center for Healthcare Innovation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Shivan J Mehta (SJ)

Center for Healthcare Innovation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Krisda H Chaiyachati (KH)

Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Center for Healthcare Innovation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Danielle L Mowery (DL)

Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH