Late gadolinium enhancement for re-worsening left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
Dilated cardiomyopathy
Late gadolinium enhancement
Left ventricular ejection fraction
Journal
ESC heart failure
ISSN: 2055-5822
Titre abrégé: ESC Heart Fail
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101669191
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2021
02 2021
Historique:
received:
25
06
2020
revised:
02
11
2020
accepted:
11
11
2020
pubmed:
4
12
2020
medline:
2
7
2021
entrez:
3
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical parameters including late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) of cardiovascular magnetic resonance to predict re-worsening of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). We included 138 patients with recent-onset DCM who had an LVEF <45% and underwent LGE of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at diagnosis and echocardiography at the yearly follow-up [median 6 (4-8.3) years]. Initial LVEF recovery was defined as LVEF increase >10% from baseline, resulting in LVEF ≧45% after treatment. The patients were divided into three groups: (i) improved (n = 83, 60%), defined as those with sustained LVEF ≧45%; (ii) re-worsening (n = 39, 28%), those with >5% decrease and LVEF <45% after the initial LVEF recovery; and (iii) not-improved (n = 16, 12%), those without initial LVEF recovery. The primary endpoint was a composite of hospitalization for heart failure or sudden cardiac death. In baseline, LGE was observed in 70 patients. The LGE area was significantly larger in the re-worsening and not-improved groups than that in the improved group (P < 0.001). Loess curves of long-term LVEF trajectories showed that LVEF in the re-worsening group increased in the first 2 years and slowly declined thereafter. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that LGE area [odds ratio (OR) 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.16, P = 0.004], B-type natriuretic peptide (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.05-2.21, P = 0.030) level at the initial recovery, and LVEF (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.97, P = 0.004) at the initial LVEF recovery were independent predictors of re-worsening of LVEF. During a median follow-up of 2273 (interquartile range: 1634-3191) days, the primary endpoint was observed in 31 (22%) patients. Univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that the risk of experiencing the primary event in the re-worsening group was significantly higher (hazard ratio: 4.30, 95% CI 1.63-11.31, P = 0.003) than that in the improved group and was lower than that in the not-improved group (hazard ratio: 0.33, 95% CI 0.15-0.72, P = 0.006). Re-worsening of LVEF was observed in 28% of patients with recent-onset DCM who showed an initial improvement in LVEF. High LGE burden, higher B-type natriuretic peptide level, and lower LVEF at the initial LVEF recovery were independent predictors of re-worsening of LVEF in patients with DCM. Careful observation is recommended for patients with a high risk for re-worsening of LVEF, even in those with an initial LVEF recovery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33270357
doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13133
pmc: PMC7835548
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Gadolinium
AU0V1LM3JT
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
615-624Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.
Références
Circulation. 2003 Jul 8;108(1):54-9
pubmed: 12821550
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Feb;8(1):615-624
pubmed: 33270357
Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Mar;16(3):317-24
pubmed: 24464640
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009 Feb;22(2):107-33
pubmed: 19187853
Eur Heart J. 2018 Oct 1;39(37):3417-3438
pubmed: 30085087
Heart Vessels. 2019 Jan;34(1):95-103
pubmed: 29942977
Heart. 2012 Mar;98(6):438-42
pubmed: 22128204
Am Heart J. 2007 Sep;154(3):589-95
pubmed: 17719311
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Sep;6(5):790-9
pubmed: 23934992
Circ Heart Fail. 2014 May;7(3):434-9
pubmed: 24563449
Circulation. 2020 Feb 4;141(5):352-361
pubmed: 31736342
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Feb;7(2):158-168
pubmed: 30611722
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Oct;10(10 Pt A):1180-1193
pubmed: 28982571
JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Oct 09;6:2048004017734476
pubmed: 29051817
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jan 13;4(1):e001504
pubmed: 25587018
Heart Vessels. 2019 Feb;34(2):259-267
pubmed: 30143883
Circ J. 2013;77(8):2157-201
pubmed: 23759659
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Sep 15;114(6):883-9
pubmed: 25084692
Heart. 2011 May;97(9):727-32
pubmed: 21097819
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Dec;18(12):1440-63
pubmed: 16376782
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jan;9(1):40-50
pubmed: 26762873
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jun 17;51(24):2329-35
pubmed: 18549918
Clin Cardiol. 2014 Apr;37(4):222-6
pubmed: 24452755
Circulation. 2013 Oct 15;128(16):e240-327
pubmed: 23741058
Circ Heart Fail. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):586-93
pubmed: 22798522
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2018 Mar 08;18:52-57
pubmed: 29876504
Circulation. 2015 Jul 28;132(4):302-61
pubmed: 25547519
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Oct;20(10):1392-1400
pubmed: 29862606
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jan 8;61(1):54-63
pubmed: 23287372
J Cardiol. 2017 Aug;70(2):185-191
pubmed: 27979675
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Aug;12(8 Pt 2):1645-1655
pubmed: 30219397
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Mar 29;57(13):1468-76
pubmed: 21435516
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jun 14;37(23):1850-8
pubmed: 26792875
JAMA. 2013 Mar 6;309(9):896-908
pubmed: 23462786
Clin Cardiol. 2014 Nov;37(11):687-92
pubmed: 25236761