Comparing audiometric parameters between crushed and intact cartilage tympanoplasty: a double-blinded, randomised, controlled trial study.
Adult
Audiometry
/ methods
Bone Conduction
/ physiology
Cartilage
/ transplantation
Double-Blind Method
Fascia
/ transplantation
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hearing
/ physiology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Otitis Media
/ complications
Speech Discrimination Tests
/ methods
Speech Reception Threshold Test
/ methods
Treatment Outcome
Tympanic Membrane Perforation
/ surgery
Tympanoplasty
/ methods
Cartilage
Tympanic Membrane
Tympanoplasty
Journal
The Journal of laryngology and otology
ISSN: 1748-5460
Titre abrégé: J Laryngol Otol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8706896
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
5
12
2020
medline:
29
1
2021
entrez:
4
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate hearing and the take rate of crushed cartilage grafts in tympanoplasty. In this double-blinded, randomised, controlled trial, 46 patients with tympanic membrane perforation were enrolled. A conchal cartilage graft was used for reconstruction in both intervention and control groups. In the intervention group, crushed cartilage was used. The success rate and hearing results were ascertained every four months over a one-year follow-up period. A total of 36 patients - 20 in the intervention group and 16 in the control group - completed one year of follow up. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in mean air-bone gap, bone conduction threshold, speech discrimination score or speech reception threshold. The reduction in living cells after crushed cartilage tympanoplasty may decrease the rigidity and the volume of the graft, but may not necessarily improve the hearing results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33272334
doi: 10.1017/S0022215120002327
pii: S0022215120002327
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM