Social cues can impact complex behavior unconsciously.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 12 2020
03 12 2020
Historique:
received:
02
06
2020
accepted:
09
11
2020
entrez:
4
12
2020
pubmed:
5
12
2020
medline:
18
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In three experiments, we investigated the effect of unconscious social priming on human behavior in a choice reaction time task. Photographs of a basketball player passing a ball to the left/right were used as target stimuli. Participants had to respond to the pass direction either by a whole-body (complex) response or a button-press (simple) response. Visually masked stimuli, showing both a task-relevant cue (pass direction) and a task-irrelevant, social cue (gaze direction), were used as primes. Subliminal social priming was found for kinematic (center of pressure) and chronometric measures (response times): gaze direction in the primes affected responses to the pass direction in the targets. The social priming effect diminished when gaze information was unhelpful or even detrimental to the task. Social priming of a complex behavior does not require awareness or intentionality, indicating automatic processing. Nevertheless, it can be controlled by top-down, strategic processes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33273521
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77646-2
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-77646-2
pmc: PMC7712880
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
21017Références
Psychol Sci. 2009 Jan;20(1):42-51
pubmed: 19152540
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Apr;71(3):594-606
pubmed: 19304649
Psychol Sci. 2018 Mar;29(3):403-417
pubmed: 29377787
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2001 Nov;33(4):479-84
pubmed: 11816450
Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1359-66
pubmed: 22006061
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 Nov;4(6):533-50
pubmed: 26161732
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Jan;76(1):148-61
pubmed: 24132711
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 Nov;123(3):355-71
pubmed: 16546104
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Feb;16(1):170-5
pubmed: 19145029
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Feb;216(3):433-43
pubmed: 22101495
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2013 Apr;35(2):144-55
pubmed: 23535973
Percept Psychophys. 2000 Nov;62(8):1572-95
pubmed: 11140180
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2011 Jun;17(2):110-27
pubmed: 21604910
Conscious Cogn. 2014 Jul;27:268-87
pubmed: 24960432
Psychol Sci. 2002 Mar;13(2):112-8
pubmed: 11933993
Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Feb;4(2):50-59
pubmed: 10652522
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jan;35(1):292-8
pubmed: 19210101
Eur J Soc Psychol. 2006;36(2):147-168
pubmed: 19844598
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Mar;8(2):195-207
pubmed: 26172502
Science. 1980 Feb 1;207(4430):557-8
pubmed: 7352271
Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:255-78
pubmed: 18154502
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 May 12;364(1521):1281-9
pubmed: 19528009
Cognition. 2003 Jun;88(2):223-42
pubmed: 12763320
Psychophysiology. 1998 Jan;35(1):99-115
pubmed: 9499711
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 Jan;9(1):40-8
pubmed: 26173239
Psychol Rev. 1954 Nov;61(6):401-9
pubmed: 13215690
Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Dec;9(4):625-36
pubmed: 12613670
Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Oct;24(5):849-78; discussion 878-937
pubmed: 12239891
Psychophysiology. 2010 Mar 1;47(2):387-92
pubmed: 20003147
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Oct;183(1):87-94
pubmed: 17624520
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;22(4):280-293
pubmed: 29571664
Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Oct;7(10):454-9
pubmed: 14550493
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1967;26(1):22-63
pubmed: 6043092
Nature. 1998 Oct 8;395(6702):597-600
pubmed: 9783584
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Aug;11(8):349-55
pubmed: 17629544
Front Psychol. 2017 May 31;8:917
pubmed: 28620336
Annu Rev Psychol. 2010;61:467-90
pubmed: 19566422
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Aug;39(4):989-1002
pubmed: 23244041
Health Psychol Rev. 2016 Dec;10(4):408-424
pubmed: 27144729