XDose: toward online cross-validation of experimental and computational X-ray dose estimation.


Journal

International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery
ISSN: 1861-6429
Titre abrégé: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101499225

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Historique:
received: 29 05 2020
accepted: 19 11 2020
pubmed: 5 12 2020
medline: 29 5 2021
entrez: 4 12 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

As the spectrum of X-ray procedures has increased both for diagnostic and for interventional cases, more attention is paid to X-ray dose management. While the medical benefit to the patient outweighs the risk of radiation injuries in almost all cases, reproducible studies on organ dose values help to plan preventive measures helping both patient as well as staff. Dose studies are either carried out retrospectively, experimentally using anthropomorphic phantoms, or computationally. When performed experimentally, it is helpful to combine them with simulations validating the measurements. In this paper, we show how such a dose simulation method, carried out together with actual X-ray experiments, can be realized to obtain reliable organ dose values efficiently. A Monte Carlo simulation technique was developed combining down-sampling and super-resolution techniques for accelerated processing accompanying X-ray dose measurements. The target volume is down-sampled using the statistical mode first. The estimated dose distribution is then up-sampled using guided filtering and the high-resolution target volume as guidance image. Second, we present a comparison of dose estimates calculated with our Monte Carlo code experimentally obtained values for an anthropomorphic phantom using metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor dosimeters. We reconstructed high-resolution dose distributions from coarse ones (down-sampling factor 2 to 16) with error rates ranging from 1.62 % to 4.91 %. Using down-sampled target volumes further reduced the computation time by 30 % to 60 %. Comparison of measured results to simulated dose values demonstrated high agreement with an average percentage error of under [Formula: see text] for all measurement points. Our results indicate that Monte Carlo methods can be accelerated hardware-independently and still yield reliable results. This facilitates empirical dose studies that make use of online Monte Carlo simulations to easily cross-validate dose estimates on-site.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33274400
doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02298-6
pii: 10.1007/s11548-020-02298-6
pmc: PMC7822800
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-10

Références

Teunen D (1998) The European directive on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionising radiation in relation to medical exposures (97/43/euratom). J Radiol Prot 18(2):133
pubmed: 9656194 doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/18/2/009
Valentin J (2007) The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. Elsevier, Oxford
European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2015) Summary of the European directive 2013/59/Euratom: essentials for health professionals in radiology. Insights Imaging 6(4):411–417
doi: 10.1007/s13244-015-0410-4
Vassileva J, Rehani M (2015) Diagnostic reference levels. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204(1):W1–W3
pubmed: 25539261 doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12794
Miller D, Balter S, Cole P, Hollington L, Schueler B, Geisinger M, Berenstein A, Albert R, Georgia J, Noonan P, Cardella J, George J, Russell E, Malisch T, Vogelzang R, Miller G, Anderson J (2003) Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the rad-ir study part i: overall measures of dose. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14(6):711–727
pubmed: 12817038 doi: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000079980.80153.4B
Jaschke W, Schmuth M, Trianni A, Bartal G (2017) Radiation-induced skin injuries to patients: what the interventional radiologist needs to know. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 40(8):1131–1140
pubmed: 28497187 pmcid: 5489635 doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1674-5
Wambani JS, Korir GK, Tries MA, Korir IK, Sakwa JM (2014) Patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations. J Appl Clin Med Phys 15(2):262–270
pmcid: 5875479 doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4555
Bratschitsch G, Leitner L, Stücklschweiger G, Guss H, Sadoghi P, Puchwein P, Leithner A, Radl R (2019) Radiation exposure of patient and operating room personnel by fluoroscopy and navigation during spinal surgery. Sci Rep 9(1):1–5
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53472-z
Heidbuchel H, Wittkampf FHM, Vano E, Ernst S, Schilling R, Picano E, Mont L (2014) Practical ways to reduce radiation dose for patients and staff during device implantations and electrophysiological procedures. Europace 16(7):946–964
pubmed: 24792380 doi: 10.1093/europace/eut409
Visweswaran S, Joseph S, Vinay Hegde O, Annalakshmi MTJ, Perumal V (2019) DNA damage and gene expression changes in patients exposed to low-dose x-radiation during neuro-interventional radiology procedures. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 844:54–61
doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.05.011
Valentin J (2000) Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures, ICRP publication 85. Ann ICRP 30(2):7–7
pubmed: 11459599 doi: 10.1016/S0146-6453(01)00004-5
Balter S, Hopewell JW, Miller DL, Wagner LK, Zelefsky MJ (2010) Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients’ skin and hair. Radiology 254(2):326–341
pubmed: 20093507 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2542082312
Wagner LK, McNeese MD, Marx MV, Siegel EL (1999) Severe skin reactions from interventional fluoroscopy: case report and review of the literature. Radiology 213(3):773–776
pubmed: 10580952 doi: 10.1148/radiology.213.3.r99dc16773
D’Incan M, Roger H, Gabrillargues J, Mansard S, Parent S, Chazal J, Irthum B, Souteyrand P (2002) Radiation-induced temporary hair loss after endovascular embolization of the cerebral arteries: six cases. Ann Dermatol Venereol 129(5):703–706
pubmed: 12124512
Johnson P-B, Borrego D, Balter S, Johnson K, Siragusa D, Bolch W-E (2011) Skin dose mapping for fluoroscopically guided interventions. Med Phys 38(10):5490–5499
pubmed: 21992367 pmcid: 3195372 doi: 10.1118/1.3633935
Bert J, Perez-Ponce H, El Bitar Z, Jan S, Boursier Y, Vintache D, Bonissent A, Morel C, Brasse D, Visvikis D (2013) Geant4-based Monte Carlo simulations on GPU for medical applications. Phys Med Biol 58(16):5593–5611
pubmed: 23892709 doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/16/5593
Wang A, Maslowski A, Wareing T, Star-Lack J, Schmidt TG (2019) A fast, linear Boltzmann transport equation-solver for computed tomography dose calculation (acuros ctd). Med Phys 46(2):925–933
pubmed: 30471131 doi: 10.1002/mp.13305
Roser P, Zhong X, Birkhold A, Strobel N, Kowarschik M, Fahrig R, Maier A (2019) Physics-driven learning of X-ray skin dose distribution in interventional procedures. Med Phys 46(10):4654–4665
pubmed: 31407346 doi: 10.1002/mp.13758
Sechopoulos I, Ali ESM, Badal A, Badano A, Boone JM, Kyprianou IS, Mainegra-Hing E, McMillan KL, McNitt-Gray MF, Rogers DWO, Samei E, Turner AC (2015) Monte Carlo reference data sets for imaging research: executive summary of the report of aapm research committee task group 195. Med Phys 42(10):5679–5691
pubmed: 26429242 doi: 10.1118/1.4928676
Roser P, Birkhold A, Zhong X, Stepina E, Kowarschik M, Fahrig R, Maier A (2019) Effects of tissue material properties on x-ray image, scatter and patient dose a monte carlo simulation. In: Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2019. Springer, New York, pp 270–275
Roser P, Birkhold A, Zhong X, Ochs P, Stepina E, Kowarschik M, Fahrig R, Maier A (2019) Pitfalls in interventional X-ray organ dose assessment-combined experimental and computational phantom study: application to prostatic artery embolization. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 14(11):1859–1869 08
pubmed: 31377964 doi: 10.1007/s11548-019-02037-6
Falco MD, Masala S, Stefanini M, Bagalà P, Morosetti D, Calabria E, Tonnetti A, Verona-Rinati G (2018) Effective-dose estimation in interventional radiological procedures. Radiol Phys Technol 11:149–155
pubmed: 29520566 doi: 10.1007/s12194-018-0446-5
Mattsson S (2016) Need for individual cancer risk estimates in X-ray and nuclear medicine imaging. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 169(1–4):11–16
pubmed: 26994092 doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncw034
Guberina N, Lechel U, Forsting M, Mönninghoff C, Dietrich U, Ringelstein A (2016) Dose comparison of classical 2-plane dsa and 3d rotational angiography for the assessment of intracranial aneurysms. Neuroradiology 58(7):673–678
pubmed: 26970990 doi: 10.1007/s00234-016-1671-4
Dzierma Y, Minko P, Ziegenhain F, Bell K, Buecker A, Rübe C, Jagoda P (2017) Abdominal imaging dose in radiology and radiotherapy-phantom point dose measurements, effective dose and secondary cancer risk. Phys Medica 43:49–56
doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.10.019
Roser P, Birkhold A, Preuhs A, Kowarschik M, Fahrig R, Maier A (2020) Tenfold your photons. In: Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2020. Springer, New York, pp 113–118
Zhong X, Strobel N, Birkhold A, Kowarschik M, Fahrig R, Maier A (2019) A machine learning pipeline for internal anatomical landmark embedding based on a patient surface model. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 14(1):53–61
pubmed: 30317437 doi: 10.1007/s11548-018-1871-y
Chen Shuqing, Zhong Xia, Shiyang Hu, Dorn Sabrina, Kachelriess Marc, Lell Michael, Maier Andreas (2018) Automatic Multi-Organ Segmentation in Dual Energy CT using 3D Fully Convolutional Network
Roser P, Birkhold A, Preuhs A, Stimpel B, Syben C, Strobel N, Kowarschik M, Fahrig R, Maier A (2020) Fully-automatic ct data preparation for interventional x-ray skin dose estimation. In: Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin, pp 125–130
International Commission on Radiological Protection (2009) ICRP publication 110: Adult reference computation phantoms. Ann ICRP 39(2)
Segars WP, Sturgeon G, Mendonca S, Grimes J, Tsui BMW (2010) 4d xcat phantom for multimodality imaging research. Med Phys 37(9):4902–4915
pubmed: 20964209 pmcid: 2941518 doi: 10.1118/1.3480985
Agostinelli S, Allison J, Amako K, Apostolakis J, Araujo H, Arce P, Asai M, Axen D, Banerjee S, Barrand G, Behner F, Bellagamba L, Boudreau J, Broglia L, Brunengo A, Burkhardt H, Chauvie S, Chuma J, Chytracek R, Cooperman G, Cosmo G, Degtyarenko P, DellÁcqua A, Depaola G, Dietrich D, Enami R, Feliciello A, Ferguson C, Fesefeldt H, Folger G, Foppiano F, Forti A, Garelli S, Giani S, Giannitrapani R, Gibin D, Gomez Cadenas JJ, Gonzalez I, Gracia Abril G, Greeniaus G, Greiner W, Grichine V, Grossheim A, Guatelli S, Gumplinger P, Hamatsu R, Hashimoto K, Hasui H, Heikkinen A, Howard A, Ivanchenko V, Johnson A, Jones FW, Kallenbach J, Kanaya N, Kawabata M, Kawabata Y, Kawaguti M, Kelner S, Kent P, Kimura A, Kodama T, Kokoulin R, Kossov M, Kurashige H, Lamanna E, Lampen T, Lara V, Lefebure V, Lei F, Liendl M, Lockman W, Longo F, Magni S, Maire M, Medernach E, Minamimoto K, Mora de Freitas P, Morita Y, Murakami K, Nagamatu M, Nartallo R, Nieminen P, Nishimura T, Ohtsubo K, Okamura M, OŃeale S, Oohata Y, Paech K, Perl J, Pfeiffer A, Pia MG, Ranjard F, Rybin A, Sadilov S, Di Salvo E, Santin G, Sasaki T, Savvas N, Sawada Y, Scherer S, Sei S, Sirotenko V, Smith D, Starkov N, Stoecker H, Sulkimo J, Takahata M, Tanaka S, Tcherniaev E, Safai Tehrani E, Tropeano M, Truscott P, Uno H, Urban L, Urban P, Verderi M, Walkden A, Wander W, Weber H, Wellisch JP, Wenaus T, Williams DC, Wright D, Yamada T, Yoshida H, Zschiesche D (2003) Geant4-a simulation toolkit. Nucl Instrum Meth A 506(3):250–303
doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8
Boone JM, Seibert JA (1997) An accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode X-ray spectra from 30 to 140 kv. Med Phys 24(11):1661–1670
pubmed: 9394272 doi: 10.1118/1.597953
Perona P, Malik J (1990) Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 12(7):629–639
doi: 10.1109/34.56205
Miao B, Jeraj R, Bao S, Mackie TR (2003) Adaptive anisotropic diffusion filtering of monte carlo dose distributions. Phys Med Biol 48(17):2767–2781
pubmed: 14516100 doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/17/303
Savitzky A, Golay MJE (1964) Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal Chem 36(8):1627–1639
doi: 10.1021/ac60214a047
Kawrakow I (2002) On the de-noising of monte carlo calculated dose distributions. Phys Med Biol 47(17):3087–3103
pubmed: 12361212 doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/17/304
He K, Sun J, Tang X (2013) Guided image filtering. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 35(6):1397–1409
pubmed: 23599054 doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2012.213
Zankl M, Petoussi-Henss N, Fill U, Regulla D (2002) Tomographic anthropomorphic models part IV: Organ doses for adults due to idealized external photon exposures. Technical report, Institute of Radiation Medicine (former Institute of Radiation Protection)
Shimizu Y, Kodama K, Nishi N, Kasagi F, Suyama A, Soda M, Grant EJ, Sugiyama H, Sakata R, Moriwaki H, Hayashi M, Konda M, Shore RE (2010) Radiation exposure and circulatory disease risk: Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb survivor data, 1950–2003. BMJ 340:b5349
pubmed: 20075151 pmcid: 2806940 doi: 10.1136/bmj.b5349
Stewart FA, Akleyev AV, Hauer-Jensen M, Hendry JH, Kleiman NJ, MacVittie TJ, Aleman BM, Edgar AB, Mabuchi K, Muirhead CR, Shore RE, Wallace WH (2012) Icrp publication 118: Icrp statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs-threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP 41(1–2):1–322
pubmed: 22925378 doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2012.02.001
Sanchez RM, Vano E, Fernández JM, Moreu M, Lopez-Ibor L (2014) Brain radiation doses to patients in an interventional neuroradiology laboratory. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35(7):1276–1280
pubmed: 24627454 doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3884
Tonkopi E, Al-Habsi AH, Shankar JJS (2015) Radiation dose from 3d rotational vs. conventional 2d digital subtraction angiography in intracranial aneurysm coiling. Can J Neurol Sci 42(3):176–180
pubmed: 25857349 doi: 10.1017/cjn.2015.22
Woodcock ER, Murphy T, Hemmings PJ, Longworth TC (1965) Techniques used in the gem code for monte carlo neutronics calculations in reactors and other systems of complex geometry, anl-7050. Technical report, Argonne National Laboratory
Behlouli A, Visvikis D, Bert J (2018) Improved woodcock tracking on monte carlo simulations for medical applications. Phys Med Biol 63(22):225005
pubmed: 30412475 doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aae937

Auteurs

Philipp Roser (P)

Pattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91058, Erlangen, Germany. philipp.roser@fau.de.
Erlangen Graduate School in Advanced Optical Technologies (SAOT), Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91052, Erlangen, Germany. philipp.roser@fau.de.

Annette Birkhold (A)

Innovation, Advanced Therapies, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, 91301, Forchheim, Germany.

Alexander Preuhs (A)

Pattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.

Philipp Ochs (P)

Innovation, Advanced Therapies, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, 91301, Forchheim, Germany.

Elizaveta Stepina (E)

Innovation, Advanced Therapies, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, 91301, Forchheim, Germany.

Norbert Strobel (N)

Institute of Medical Engineering Schweinfurt, University of Applied Sciences Würzburg-Schweinfurt, 97421, Schweinfurt, Germany.

Markus Kowarschik (M)

Innovation, Advanced Therapies, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, 91301, Forchheim, Germany.

Rebecca Fahrig (R)

Innovation, Advanced Therapies, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, 91301, Forchheim, Germany.

Andreas Maier (A)

Pattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.
Erlangen Graduate School in Advanced Optical Technologies (SAOT), Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91052, Erlangen, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH