Management of toxicities associated with targeted therapies for acute myeloid leukemia: when to push through and when to stop.

The recent advent of myriad targeted therapies for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has led to new hope for our patients but has also introduced new challenges in managing the disease. For clinicians, the ability to treat AML in the outpatient setting with novel agents of equal or greater efficacy than 7+3 has been transformative. Despite the enthusiasm, however, the reality is that many patients are still frail and remain at risk for treatment-related complications. Translating the results of clinical trials into improved outcomes for these individuals requires an understanding of how best to manage the adverse effects of these agents. Which patients benefit most and what to watch for? When to stop therapy? Using illustrative case presentations, this review details the unique toxicities associated with each of the approved mutation-specific and nonspecific targeted drugs for AML. The goal of this review is to help clinicians determine the risk:benefit ratio in decision making for individual patients with AML.

Informations de copyright

© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: E.S.W. served on advisory boards and/or provided consulting services for AbbVie, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Dava Oncology/Arog, Genentech, Jazz, Kite Pharmaceuticals, Kura Oncology, Macrogenics, Pfizer, PTC Therapeutics, and Stemline; served on independent data review committees for clinical trials for AbbVie, Genentech, and Rafael Pharmaceuticals; and served as a speaker for Stemline and Pfizer. J.B. declares no competing financial interests.