Editorial Commentary: Moving the Needle: Traditional Inside-Out Meniscal Repair Has Advantages Over All-Inside Repair.
Journal
Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association
ISSN: 1526-3231
Titre abrégé: Arthroscopy
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8506498
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
received:
28
09
2020
accepted:
01
10
2020
entrez:
5
12
2020
pubmed:
6
12
2020
medline:
16
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Meniscus repairs for vertical, peripheral tears can be troublesome due to poor tissue quality and/or vascularity that can lead to re-rupture and subsequent removal. The gold standard, inside-out repair technique, has been challenged by all-inside devices for the benefit of improved efficiency and less morbidity but for the sake of expense and potential structural inferiority. Successful meniscus repair requires multiple components, only one of which is deciding the repair construct of choice. I feel the most important aspect will always be the indication based on tear configuration while respecting biology, because all fixation will eventually fail if the meniscus does not ultimately heal. While all-inside devices may have biomechanical properties that are similar to inside-out techniques, the burden of proof still lies on showing superiority of these devices in a clinical setting. Clinically, I still use inside-out repair techniques for large tears or for high-demand patients due to its structural integrity and small penetration of the meniscus.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33276888
pii: S0749-8063(20)30830-6
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.10.003
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Editorial
Comment
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3008-3009Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentOn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.