Infection and mortality of healthcare workers worldwide from COVID-19: a systematic review.
diseases
disorders
infections
injuries
public health
review
Journal
BMJ global health
ISSN: 2059-7908
Titre abrégé: BMJ Glob Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101685275
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
received:
08
06
2020
revised:
19
09
2020
accepted:
09
10
2020
entrez:
5
12
2020
pubmed:
6
12
2020
medline:
18
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To estimate COVID-19 infections and deaths in healthcare workers (HCWs) from a global perspective during the early phases of the pandemic. Systematic review. Two parallel searches of academic bibliographic databases and grey literature were undertaken until 8 May 2020. Governments were also contacted for further information where possible. There were no restrictions on language, information sources used, publication status and types of sources of evidence. The AACODS checklist or the National Institutes of Health study quality assessment tools were used to appraise each source of evidence. Publication characteristics, country-specific data points, COVID-19-specific data, demographics of affected HCWs and public health measures employed. A total of 152 888 infections and 1413 deaths were reported. Infections were mainly in women (71.6%, n=14 058) and nurses (38.6%, n=10 706), but deaths were mainly in men (70.8%, n=550) and doctors (51.4%, n=525). Limited data suggested that general practitioners and mental health nurses were the highest risk specialities for deaths. There were 37.2 deaths reported per 100 infections for HCWs aged over 70 years. Europe had the highest absolute numbers of reported infections (119 628) and deaths (712), but the Eastern Mediterranean region had the highest number of reported deaths per 100 infections (5.7). COVID-19 infections and deaths among HCWs follow that of the general population around the world. The reasons for gender and specialty differences require further exploration, as do the low rates reported in Africa and India. Although physicians working in certain specialities may be considered high risk due to exposure to oronasal secretions, the risk to other specialities must not be underestimated. Elderly HCWs may require assigning to less risky settings such as telemedicine or administrative positions. Our pragmatic approach provides general trends, and highlights the need for universal guidelines for testing and reporting of infections in HCWs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33277297
pii: bmjgh-2020-003097
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003097
pmc: PMC7722361
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Jun;230(6):1098-1101
pubmed: 32247836
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;222(6):521-531
pubmed: 32217113
Anaesthesia. 2020 Jun;75(6):785-799
pubmed: 32221970
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jun;8(6):e790-e798
pubmed: 32573443
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 17;69(15):477-481
pubmed: 32298247
BMJ. 2020 Mar 26;368:m1211
pubmed: 32217624
BMJ. 2020 Mar 5;368:m800
pubmed: 32144127
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Dec;5(12):
pubmed: 33277297
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;7(4):e15-e16
pubmed: 32085839
Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Jan 1;93(1):3
pubmed: 25558098
Hum Resour Health. 2017 Feb 3;15(1):11
pubmed: 28159017
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):727-733
pubmed: 31978945
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Jul;87:40-48
pubmed: 32298802
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e203976
pubmed: 32202646