Usefulness of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Aged
Coronary Angiography
/ methods
Coronary Vessels
/ diagnostic imaging
Cross-Sectional Studies
Electrocardiography
Female
Humans
Male
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
/ methods
Retrospective Studies
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
/ diagnosis
Surgery, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Treatment Outcome
Contrast medium
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Radiation exposure
Rotational coronary angiography
ST-elevation myocardial infarction
Journal
Heart and vessels
ISSN: 1615-2573
Titre abrégé: Heart Vessels
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 8511258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
received:
03
08
2020
accepted:
20
11
2020
pubmed:
6
12
2020
medline:
15
9
2021
entrez:
5
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Several studies have shown that dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (DARCA) reduces contrast medium volume and radiation exposure compared to conventional coronary angiography (CCA). However, there are no studies comparing the safety and usefulness of DARCA in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of DARCA on contrast medium volume, radiation exposure, time course of treatment, and adverse events in primary PCI for patients with STEMI. A total of 82 patients undergoing primary PCI were included in this study. Subjects were propensity matched to 41 patients in the CCA group and 41 in the DARCA group. Data were retrospectively collected from in-patient medical records and the contrast medium volume and radiation exposure (dose-area product, DAP) during the PCI procedure was compared between the two groups. Contrast medium volume [100.0 (82.5-115.0) vs 110 (102.5-127.5) ml, p = 0.018, r = 0.26] and DAP [113.4 (74.3-141.1) vs 138.1 (100.5-194.7) Gy cm
Identifiants
pubmed: 33277662
doi: 10.1007/s00380-020-01738-2
pii: 10.1007/s00380-020-01738-2
pmc: PMC8032619
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
621-629Références
Bruschke AV, Sheldon WC, Shirey EK, Proudfit WL (2009) A half century of selective coronary arteriography. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:2139–2144
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.051
McCullough PA, Choi JP, Feghali GA, Schussler JM, Stoler RM, Vallabahn RC, Mehta A (2016) Contrast-induced acute kidney injury. J Am Coll Cardiol 68:1465–1473
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.099
Mukai Y, Sakakura K, Yamamoto K, Taniguchi Y, Tsukui T, Seguchi M, Wada H, Momomura SI, Fujita H (2020) Association of less-contrast media with clinical factors in elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart Vessels 35:143–152
doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01473-3
Davenport MS, Perazella MA, Yee J, Dillman JR, Fine D, McDonald RJ, Rodby RA, Wang CL, Weinreb JC (2020) Use of intravenous iodinated contrast media in patients with kidney disease: consensus statements from the American College of Radiology and the National Kidney Foundation. Radiology 294:660–668
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019192094
Nakamura S, Kobayashi T, Funatsu A, Okada T, Mauti M, Waizumi Y, Yamada S (2016) Patient radiation dose reduction using an X-ray imaging noise reduction technology for cardiac angiography and intervention. Heart Vessels 31:655–663
doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0667-z
Harold JG, Bass TA, Bashore TM, Brindis RG, Brush JE Jr, Burke JA, Dehmer GJ, Deychak YA, Jneid H, Jollis JG, Landzberg JS, Levine GN, McClurken JB, Messenger JC, Moussa ID, Muhlestein JB, Pomerantz RM, Sanborn TA, Sivaram CA, White CJ, Williams ES (2013) ACCF/AHA/SCAI 2013 update of the clinical competence statement on coronary artery interventional procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training (Writing Committee to Revise the 2007 Clinical Competence Statement on Cardiac Interventional Procedures). J Am Coll Cardiol 62:357–396
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.002
Tommasini G, Camerini A, Gatti A, Derchi G, Bruzzone A, Vecchio C (1998) Panoramic coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 31:871–877
doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00014-X
Maddux JT, Wink O, Messenger JC, Groves BM, Liao R, Strzelczyk J, Chen SY, Carroll JD (2004) Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography versus standard angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 62:167–174
doi: 10.1002/ccd.20036
Horisaki T, Katoh O, Imai S, Inada T, Suzuki T, Iinuma K, Sugiura H, Bakker N, Melman N (2008) Feasibility evaluation of dual axis rotational angiography (XperSwing) in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Medicamundi 52:3–7
Gómez-Menchero AE, Díaz JF, Sánchez-González C, Cardenal R, Sanghvi AB, Roa-Garrido J, Rodríguez-López JL (2012) Comparison of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (XPERSWING) versus conventional technique in routine practice. Rev Esp Cardiol 65:434–439
doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2011.12.014
Yasar AS, Perino AC, Dattilo PB, Casserly IP, Carroll JD, Messenger JC (2013) Comparison of a safety strategy using transradial access and dual-axis rotational coronary angiography with transfemoral access and standard coronary angiography. J Interv Cardiol 26:524–529
doi: 10.1111/joic.12054
Unzué Vallejo L, Delcán Domínguez JL, Alegría Barrero A, Medina Peralta J, Rodríguez Rodrigo FJ, Rodríguez-López JL (2013) Coronary lesions quantification with dual-axis rotational coronary angiography. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 14:37–40
doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2012.11.001
Di Serafino L, Turturo M, Lanzone S, Marano M, Scognamiglio G, Trimarco B, Cirillo P, Esposito G, D’Agostino C (2018) Comparison of the effect of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography on frequency of acute kidney injury, X-Ray exposure time, and quantity of contrast medium injected. Am J Cardiol 121:1046–1050
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.01.028
Szarfer J, Albornoz F, Alonso A, Yurko V, Blanco F, Blanco R, Indavere A, Gigena G, Gagliardi J, Escudero AG (2020) Is Dual-Axis rotational coronary angiography radiation dose reduction achievable in a population with 100% suspected coronary artery disease? J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 51:241–246
doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2019.12.009
Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects (2015) https://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/06-Seisakujouhou-10600000-Daijinkanboukouseikagakuka/0000166072.pdf . Accessed: 5 May 2020.
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, White HD, Executive Group on behalf of the Joint European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/World Heart Federation (WHF) Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018) (2018) Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Circulation 138:e618–e651
doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000617
Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, Caforio ALP, Crea F, Goudevenos JA, Halvorsen S, Hindricks G, Kastrati A, Lenzen MJ, Prescott E, Roffi M, Valgimigli M, Varenhorst C, Vranckx P, Widimský P, ESC Scientific Document Group (2018) (2017) 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 39:119–177
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393
Saito S, Isshiki T, Kimura T, Ogawa H, Yokoi H, Nanto S, Takayama M, Kitagawa K, Nishikawa M, Miyazaki S, Nakamura M (2014) Efficacy and safety of adjusted-dose prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in Japanese patients with acute coronary syndrome: the PRASFIT-ACS study. Circ J 78:1684–1692
doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-13-1482
Stacul F, van der Molen AJ, Reimer P, Webb JA, Thomsen HS, Morcos SK, Almén T, Aspelin P, Bellin MF, Clement O, Heinz-Peer G (2011) Contrast Media Safety Committee of European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Contrast induced nephropathy: updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines. Eur Radiol 21:2527–2541
doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2225-0
Farshid A, Chandrasekhar J, McLean D (2014) Benefits of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography in routine clinical practice. Heart Vessels 29:199–205
doi: 10.1007/s00380-013-0349-7
Fernández-Rodríguez D, Grillo-Pérez JJ, Pérez-Hernández H, Rodríguez-Esteban M, Pimienta R, Acosta-Materán C, Rodríguez S, Yanes-Bowden G, Vargas-Torres MJ, Sánchez-Grande Flecha A, Hernández-Afonso J, Bosa-Ojeda F (2018) Prospective evaluation of the development of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing rotational coronary angiography vs. conventional coronary angiography: CINERAMA study. Nefrologia 38:169–178
doi: 10.1016/j.nefro.2017.05.011
Klein AJ, Garcia JA, Hudson PA, Kim MS, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Wink O, Hattler B, Tsai TT, Chen SY, Hansgen A, Carroll JD (2011) Safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography vs. standard coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 77:820–827
doi: 10.1002/ccd.22804
Morris PD, Taylor J, Boutong S, Brett S, Louis A, Heppenstall J, Morton AC, Gunn JP (2016) When is rotational angiography superior to conventional single-plane angiography for planning coronary angioplasty? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 87:E104–E112
doi: 10.1002/ccd.26032
Giuberti RS, Caixeta A, Carvalho AC, Soares MM, Silva EO, Pestana JO, Júnior HT, Vaz ML, Généreux P, Fernandes RW (2014) A randomized trial comparing dual axis rotational versus conventional coronary angiography in a population with a high prevalence of coronary artery disease. J Interv Cardiol 27:456–464
doi: 10.1111/joic.12148
Grech M, Debono J, Xuereb RG, Fenech A, Grech V (2012) A comparison between dual axis rotational coronary angiography and conventional coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 80:576–580
doi: 10.1002/ccd.23415
Jin ZG, Zhang ZQ, Jing LM, Wei YJ, Zhang J, Luo JP, Yang SL, Ma DX, Liu Y, Han W, Yang Y, Liu HL (2017) Correlation between dual-axis rotational coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound in a coronary lesion assessment. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:153–160
doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-0999-5
Hudson PA, Klein AJ, Kim MS, Wink O, Hansgen A, Casserly IP, Messenger JC, James Chen SY, Carroll JD, Garcia JA (2010) A novel dual-axis rotational coronary angiography evaluation of coronary artery disease–case presentation and review. Clin Cardiol 33:E16–E19
doi: 10.1002/clc.20651
Rios R, Loomba RS, Foerster SR, Pelech AN, Gudausky TM (2016) Dual-Axis Rotational Angiography is Safe and Feasible to Detect Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy in Pediatric Heart Transplant Patients: A Single-Center Experience. Pediatr Cardiol 37:740–745
doi: 10.1007/s00246-016-1344-4
Liu HL, Jin ZG, Yang SL, Luo JP, Ma DX, Liu Y, Han W (2012) Randomized study on the safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational versus standard coronary angiography in the Chinese population. Chin Med J 125:1016–1022
pubmed: 22613524
Silvain J, Nguyen LS, Spagnoli V, Kerneis M, Guedeney P, Vignolles N, Cosker K, Barthelemy O, Le Feuvre C, Helft G, Collet JP, Montalescot G (2018) Contrast-induced acute kidney injury and mortality in ST elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart 104:767–772
doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311975