Vertebral disk morphology of the lumbar spine: a retrospective analysis of collagen-sensitive mapping using dual-energy computed tomography.
Collagen
Pathology
Spine
Tomography
Vertebral disk
X-ray computed
Journal
Skeletal radiology
ISSN: 1432-2161
Titre abrégé: Skeletal Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7701953
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
12
10
2020
accepted:
25
11
2020
revised:
24
11
2020
pubmed:
6
12
2020
medline:
25
6
2021
entrez:
5
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of collagen-sensitive maps derived from dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for the detection of lumbar disk pathologies in a feasibility setting. We retrospectively reviewed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and DECT datasets acquired in patients who underwent periradicular therapy of the lumbar spine from June to December 2019. Three readers scored DECT collagen maps, conventional CT, and MRI for presence, type, and extent of disk pathology. Contingency table analyses were performed to determine diagnostic accuracy using MRI as standard of reference. Interrater agreement within and between imaging modalities was evaluated by computing intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Cohen's kappa. Correlation between sum scores of anteroposterior disk displacement was determined by calculation of a paired t test. In 21 disks in 13 patients, DECT had a sensitivity of 0.87 (0.60-0.98) and specificity of 1.00 (0.54-1.00) for the detection of disk pathology. Intermodality agreement for anteroposterior disk displacement was excellent for DECT (ICC 0.963 [0.909-0.985]) and superior to CT (ICC 0.876 [0.691-0.95]). For anteroposterior disk displacement, DECT also showed greater within-modality interrater agreement (ICC 0.820 [0.666-0.916]) compared with CT (ICC 0.624 [0.39-0.808]). Our data suggest that collagen-sensitive imaging has an added benefit, allowing more accurate evaluation of the extent of disk displacement with higher interrater reliability. Thus, DECT could provide useful diagnostic information in patients undergoing CT for other indications or with contraindications to MRI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33277674
doi: 10.1007/s00256-020-03685-5
pii: 10.1007/s00256-020-03685-5
pmc: PMC8119261
doi:
Substances chimiques
Collagen
9007-34-5
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1359-1367Références
Spine J. 2014 Nov 1;14(11):2525-45
pubmed: 24768732
Radiology. 2018 Jan;286(1):205-213
pubmed: 28799843
Eur Radiol. 2019 Aug;29(8):4495-4502
pubmed: 30649597
Neurol Clin. 2007 May;25(2):387-405
pubmed: 17445735
Eur J Radiol. 2015 Jun;84(6):1109-15
pubmed: 25816992
Skeletal Radiol. 2014 Sep;43(9):1289-95
pubmed: 24913554
Radiology. 2019 Feb;290(2):446-455
pubmed: 30615548
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Feb;87:59-65
pubmed: 28065376
Eur Radiol. 2019 Jan;29(1):31-39
pubmed: 29948088
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jan;79(1):31-38
pubmed: 31167758
Radiol Med. 2019 Dec;124(12):1281-1295
pubmed: 31792703
Radiology. 2016 Dec;281(3):690-707
pubmed: 27870622
Skeletal Radiol. 2014 Apr;43(4):485-92
pubmed: 24445957
Cureus. 2019 Oct 17;11(10):e5934
pubmed: 31788391