An Affordable, User-friendly Telerehabilitation System Assembled Using Existing Technologies for Individuals Isolated With COVID-19: Development and Feasibility Study.

COVID-19 eHealth feasibility isolation rehabilitation telemedicine telerehabilitation user-friendly

Journal

JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies
ISSN: 2369-2529
Titre abrégé: JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101703412

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Dec 2020
Historique:
received: 13 10 2020
accepted: 05 12 2020
revised: 17 11 2020
pubmed: 7 12 2020
medline: 7 12 2020
entrez: 6 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Isolation due to a COVID-19 infection can limit activities and cause physical and mental decline, especially in older adults and people with disabilities. However, due to limited contact, adequate rehabilitation is difficult to provide for quarantined patients. Telerehabilitation technology could be a solution; however, issues specific to COVID-19 should be taken into consideration, such as strict quarantine and respiratory symptoms, as well as accessibility to deal with rapid increases in need due to the pandemic. This study aims to develop and to investigate the feasibility of a telerehabilitation system for patients who are quarantined due to COVID-19 by combining existing commercial devices and computer applications. A multidisciplinary team has identified the requirements for a telerehabilitation system for COVID-19 and developed the system to satisfy those requirements. In the subsequent feasibility study, patients diagnosed with COVID-19 (N=10; mean age 60 years, SD 18 years) were included. A single session of telerehabilitation consisted of stretching exercises, a 15-minute exercise program, and a video exercise program conducted under real-time guidance by a physical therapist through a video call. The system included a tablet computer, a pulse oximeter, videoconferencing software, and remote control software. The feasibility of the system was evaluated using the Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ; 14 items) and an additional questionnaire on the telerehabilitation system (5 items). Each item was rated from "1 = strongly disagree" to "5 = strongly agree." The telerehabilitation system was developed by combining existing devices and applications, including a pulse oximeter and remote control mechanism, to achieve user-friendliness, affordability, and safety, which were determined as the system requirements. In the feasibility study, 9 out of 10 patients were able to use the telerehabilitation system without any on-site help. On the TSQ, the mean score for each item was 4.7 (SD 0.7), and in the additional items regarding telerehabilitation, the mean score for each item was 4.3 (SD 1.0). These findings support the feasibility of this simple telerehabilitation system in quarantined patients with COVID-19, encouraging further investigation on the merit of the system's use in clinical practice.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Isolation due to a COVID-19 infection can limit activities and cause physical and mental decline, especially in older adults and people with disabilities. However, due to limited contact, adequate rehabilitation is difficult to provide for quarantined patients. Telerehabilitation technology could be a solution; however, issues specific to COVID-19 should be taken into consideration, such as strict quarantine and respiratory symptoms, as well as accessibility to deal with rapid increases in need due to the pandemic.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study aims to develop and to investigate the feasibility of a telerehabilitation system for patients who are quarantined due to COVID-19 by combining existing commercial devices and computer applications.
METHODS METHODS
A multidisciplinary team has identified the requirements for a telerehabilitation system for COVID-19 and developed the system to satisfy those requirements. In the subsequent feasibility study, patients diagnosed with COVID-19 (N=10; mean age 60 years, SD 18 years) were included. A single session of telerehabilitation consisted of stretching exercises, a 15-minute exercise program, and a video exercise program conducted under real-time guidance by a physical therapist through a video call. The system included a tablet computer, a pulse oximeter, videoconferencing software, and remote control software. The feasibility of the system was evaluated using the Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ; 14 items) and an additional questionnaire on the telerehabilitation system (5 items). Each item was rated from "1 = strongly disagree" to "5 = strongly agree."
RESULTS RESULTS
The telerehabilitation system was developed by combining existing devices and applications, including a pulse oximeter and remote control mechanism, to achieve user-friendliness, affordability, and safety, which were determined as the system requirements. In the feasibility study, 9 out of 10 patients were able to use the telerehabilitation system without any on-site help. On the TSQ, the mean score for each item was 4.7 (SD 0.7), and in the additional items regarding telerehabilitation, the mean score for each item was 4.3 (SD 1.0).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
These findings support the feasibility of this simple telerehabilitation system in quarantined patients with COVID-19, encouraging further investigation on the merit of the system's use in clinical practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33279877
pii: v7i2e24960
doi: 10.2196/24960
pmc: PMC7732353
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e24960

Informations de copyright

©Masahiko Mukaino, Tsuyoshi Tatemoto, Nobuhiro Kumazawa, Shigeo Tanabe, Masaki Katoh, Eiichi Saitoh, Yohei Otaka. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (http://rehab.jmir.org), 10.12.2020.

Références

Int J Telerehabil. 2020 Jun 30;12(1):3-16
pubmed: 32983365
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 09;(4):CD010508
pubmed: 25854331
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jun 24;8(6):e15375
pubmed: 32357128
J Nutr Health Aging. 2020;24(9):938-947
pubmed: 33155618
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Mar 31;17(3):e83
pubmed: 25840501
Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:6-18
pubmed: 3503663
Int J Telerehabil. 2018 Aug 03;10(1):15-28
pubmed: 30147840
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2002;4:287-320
pubmed: 12117760
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jun;99(6):478-479
pubmed: 32282339
J Rehabil Med. 2013 Apr;45(4):392-6
pubmed: 23474735
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Nov 19;15(11):e258
pubmed: 24252663
J Telemed Telecare. 2019 Sep 17;:1357633X19869796
pubmed: 31530065
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;220:408-13
pubmed: 27390963
Chron Respir Dis. 2018 Feb;15(1):41-47
pubmed: 28786297
Ann Behav Med. 1997 Spring;19(2):152-60
pubmed: 9603690
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 28;19(4):e142
pubmed: 28455277
J Telemed Telecare. 2017 Jun;23(5):529-535
pubmed: 27279467
J Telemed Telecare. 2003;9(1):46-50
pubmed: 12641893
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Jul 15;97(14):1129-41
pubmed: 26178888
J Physiother. 2017 Apr;63(2):101-107
pubmed: 28336297
J Telemed Telecare. 2020 Aug 26;:1357633X20948302
pubmed: 32847466
Telemed J E Health. 2015 Nov;21(11):870-9
pubmed: 26075928
Heart Lung. 2020 Nov - Dec;49(6):883-884
pubmed: 32690219

Auteurs

Masahiko Mukaino (M)

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine I, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.

Tsuyoshi Tatemoto (T)

Faculty of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.

Nobuhiro Kumazawa (N)

Faculty of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.

Shigeo Tanabe (S)

Faculty of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.

Masaki Katoh (M)

Department of Rehabilitation, Fujita Health University Hospital, Toyoake, Japan.

Eiichi Saitoh (E)

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine I, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.

Yohei Otaka (Y)

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine I, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.

Classifications MeSH