Sex dimorphism in pediatric burn mortality in Malawi: A propensity matched analysis.
Adolescent
Body Surface Area
Burn Units
/ organization & administration
Burns
/ epidemiology
Child
Child, Preschool
Cohort Studies
Correlation of Data
Female
Humans
Infant
Length of Stay
/ statistics & numerical data
Logistic Models
Malawi
/ epidemiology
Male
Pediatrics
/ methods
Propensity Score
Retrospective Studies
Sex Characteristics
Sex and burn outcomes
Sex dimorphism and burn mortality
Journal
Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries
ISSN: 1879-1409
Titre abrégé: Burns
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8913178
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2021
02 2021
Historique:
received:
16
03
2020
revised:
20
04
2020
accepted:
11
05
2020
pubmed:
8
12
2020
medline:
9
11
2021
entrez:
7
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is increasing evidence that sex differences may influence pathophysiology after thermal injury and affect clinical outcomes. This study aimed to assess the relationships between sex, thermal injury, and inpatient mortality in a pediatric burn cohort in a resource-limited setting. This is a retrospective analysis of data collected from the Kamuzu Central Hospital Burns Unit, in Lilongwe, Malawi, from May 2011 to December 2019 on all pediatric patients (≤12 years). We performed a bivariate analysis by sex comparing demographics, burn characteristics, surgical intervention, and mortality. Standardized estimates were adjusted using the inverse probability of treatment weights to account for confounding. Following weighting, odds of mortality based on sex were obtained via logistic regression modeling. A total of 1904 children were admitted with a male preponderance (n = 1065, 55.9 %). Overall, the median age was 3 years (IQR1-4). Females had a higher percent total body surface area (%TBSA) burn than males, 15 % vs. 13 % (p = 0.03), respectively. Flame burns were more frequent in females compared to males, 32 % and 23 %, respectively (p < 0.001). There were higher rates of surgical intervention in females than males (20.9 % vs. 16.7 %, p = 0.02). The propensity score weighted logistic regression predicting mortality revealed no difference in the odds of mortality based on sex (OR 1.12, 95 % CI 0.82-1.52, p = 0.5). We show males are just as likely to die from burns compared to females with similar injuries in this propensity-matched analysis. A lack of difference in mortality may be attributable to the similarities in the hormonal profile in the prepubescent child.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33280955
pii: S0305-4179(20)30358-2
doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.05.005
pmc: PMC7721814
mid: NIHMS1595847
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
228-233Subventions
Organisme : FIC NIH HHS
ID : D43 TW009340
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM008450
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.
Références
Ann Surg. 2002 Jan;235(1):105-12
pubmed: 11753049
Shock. 2014 Jul;42(1):11-5
pubmed: 24667619
Burns. 2011 Dec;37(8):1394-402
pubmed: 21855219
Burns. 2014 Sep;40(6):1194-200
pubmed: 24461306
Burns. 2016 Mar;42(2):258-66
pubmed: 25981292
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990 Apr;170(4):295-8
pubmed: 2321118
N Engl J Med. 1998 Feb 5;338(6):362-6
pubmed: 9449729
J Burn Care Res. 2006 Jul-Aug;27(4):452-6
pubmed: 16819347
J Trauma. 1993 Sep;35(3):335-9
pubmed: 8371288
Ann Surg. 2015 Apr;261(4):774-80
pubmed: 25029437
J Trauma. 1994 Oct;37(4):655-9
pubmed: 7932899
Ann Emerg Med. 1982 May;11(5):260-2
pubmed: 7073049
J Leukoc Biol. 2000 Mar;67(3):319-26
pubmed: 10733091
East Afr Med J. 1994 May;71(5):317-22
pubmed: 7925065
Shock. 2002 Oct;18(4):311-5
pubmed: 12392273
BMC Public Health. 2009 Oct 06;9:374
pubmed: 19804652
East Afr J Public Health. 2008 Apr;5(1):38-42
pubmed: 18669122
World J Surg. 2009 Sep;33(9):1836-41
pubmed: 19597877
Ann Surg. 2008 Jul;248(1):126-36
pubmed: 18580216
Burns. 2016 Nov;42(7):1600-1608
pubmed: 27262931
J Trauma. 2002 Sep;53(3):430-4; discussion 434-5
pubmed: 12352476