An Educational Network for Surgical Education Supported by Gamification Elements: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.
COVID-19
advanced sutures
distance learning
gamification
learning platform
medical education
medical student
peer learning
subcuticular sutures
surgery
surgical pedagogy
video
web-based learning
web-based tool
Journal
JMIR research protocols
ISSN: 1929-0748
Titre abrégé: JMIR Res Protoc
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101599504
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Dec 2020
14 Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
09
06
2020
accepted:
24
11
2020
revised:
12
08
2020
pubmed:
8
12
2020
medline:
8
12
2020
entrez:
7
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Traditionally, medical students have learned surgical skills by observing a resident physician or surgeon who is performing the technique. Due to inconsistent practice opportunities in the clinical setting, a disparity of skill levels among students has been observed. In addition, the poor availability of faculty professors is a limiting factor in teaching and adequately preparing medical students for their clerkship years. With the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, medical students do not have access to traditional suturing learning opportunities. Didactic courses are available on videoconferencing platforms; however, these courses do not include technical training. Our overarching goal is to evaluate the efficacy and usability of web-based peer-learning for advanced suturing techniques (ie, running subcuticular sutures). We will use the Gamified Educational Network (GEN), a newly developed web-based learning tool. We will assess students' ability to identify and perform the correct technique. We will also assess the students' satisfaction with regard to GEN. We will conduct a prospective randomized controlled trial with blinding of expert examiners. First-year medical students in the Faculty of Medicine of Université de Montréal will be randomized into four groups: (1) control, (2) self-learning, (3) peer-learning, and (4) peer-learning with expert feedback. Each arm will have 15 participants who will learn how to perform running subcuticular sutures through videos on GEN. For our primary outcome, the students' ability to identify the correct technique will be evaluated before and after the intervention on GEN. The students will view eight videos and rate the surgical techniques using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills Global Rating Scale and the Subcuticular Suture Checklist as evaluation criteria. For our secondary outcomes, students will anonymously record themselves performing a running subcuticular suture and will be evaluated using the same scales. Then, a survey will be sent to assess the students' acceptance of the intervention. The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by our institutional review board (CERSES 20-068-D). No participants have been recruited yet. Peer learning through GEN has the potential to overcome significant limitations related to the COVID-19 pandemic and the lack of availability of faculty professors. Further, a decrease of the anxiety related to traditional suturing classes can be expected. We aim to create an innovative and sustainable method of teaching surgical skills to improve the efficiency and quality of surgical training in medical faculties. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the need for such tools is imperative. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04425499; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04425499. PRR1-10.2196/21273.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Traditionally, medical students have learned surgical skills by observing a resident physician or surgeon who is performing the technique. Due to inconsistent practice opportunities in the clinical setting, a disparity of skill levels among students has been observed. In addition, the poor availability of faculty professors is a limiting factor in teaching and adequately preparing medical students for their clerkship years. With the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, medical students do not have access to traditional suturing learning opportunities. Didactic courses are available on videoconferencing platforms; however, these courses do not include technical training.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
Our overarching goal is to evaluate the efficacy and usability of web-based peer-learning for advanced suturing techniques (ie, running subcuticular sutures). We will use the Gamified Educational Network (GEN), a newly developed web-based learning tool. We will assess students' ability to identify and perform the correct technique. We will also assess the students' satisfaction with regard to GEN.
METHODS
METHODS
We will conduct a prospective randomized controlled trial with blinding of expert examiners. First-year medical students in the Faculty of Medicine of Université de Montréal will be randomized into four groups: (1) control, (2) self-learning, (3) peer-learning, and (4) peer-learning with expert feedback. Each arm will have 15 participants who will learn how to perform running subcuticular sutures through videos on GEN. For our primary outcome, the students' ability to identify the correct technique will be evaluated before and after the intervention on GEN. The students will view eight videos and rate the surgical techniques using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills Global Rating Scale and the Subcuticular Suture Checklist as evaluation criteria. For our secondary outcomes, students will anonymously record themselves performing a running subcuticular suture and will be evaluated using the same scales. Then, a survey will be sent to assess the students' acceptance of the intervention.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by our institutional review board (CERSES 20-068-D). No participants have been recruited yet.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Peer learning through GEN has the potential to overcome significant limitations related to the COVID-19 pandemic and the lack of availability of faculty professors. Further, a decrease of the anxiety related to traditional suturing classes can be expected. We aim to create an innovative and sustainable method of teaching surgical skills to improve the efficiency and quality of surgical training in medical faculties. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the need for such tools is imperative.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04425499; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04425499.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)
UNASSIGNED
PRR1-10.2196/21273.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33284780
pii: v9i12e21273
doi: 10.2196/21273
pmc: PMC7744140
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04425499']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e21273Informations de copyright
©Natasha Guérard-Poirier, Michèle Beniey, Léamarie Meloche-Dumas, Florence Lebel-Guay, Bojana Misheva, Myriam Abbas, Malek Dhane, Myriam Elraheb, Adam Dubrowski, Erica Patocskai. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 14.12.2020.
Références
Arch Dermatol. 2004 Nov;140(11):1357-61
pubmed: 15545545
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000 Mar;82(2):88-94
pubmed: 10743423
Cir Cir. 2019;87(6):624-629
pubmed: 31631184
Med Educ. 2009 Feb;43(2):113-20
pubmed: 19161480
Am J Surg. 2010 Jan;199(1):94-8
pubmed: 20103072
Surgery. 2008 Apr;143(4):539-44
pubmed: 18374052
Can J Surg. 2013 Dec;56(6):E142-7
pubmed: 24284153
Acad Radiol. 2020 Oct;27(10):1461-1466
pubmed: 32747181
Anat Sci Educ. 2018 Nov;11(6):605-612
pubmed: 29603672
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Aug;55:45-53
pubmed: 28521249
J Vis Commun Med. 2005 Dec;28(4):150-5
pubmed: 16503567
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019;16:7
pubmed: 30986892
Cureus. 2020 Apr 23;12(4):e7800
pubmed: 32461867
Int J Surg. 2014;12(8):877-82
pubmed: 24909137
Acad Med. 1996 Dec;71(12):1363-5
pubmed: 9114900
Surgery. 2013 Oct;154(4):823-9; discussion 829-30
pubmed: 24074421
J Surg Res. 2015 Apr;194(2):334-340
pubmed: 25553842
Am J Surg. 1997 Mar;173(3):226-30
pubmed: 9124632
Surg Endosc. 2009 Dec;23(12):2755-61
pubmed: 19444512
J Surg Res. 1979 Dec;27(6):385-91
pubmed: 160965
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 28;21(3):e12994
pubmed: 30920375
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Oct 27;20(1):385
pubmed: 33109168
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jul 22;19(1):273
pubmed: 31331319
Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Jun 06;32(2):211-215
pubmed: 32269957
Ann Surg. 2006 Sep;244(3):400-9
pubmed: 16926566
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Feb;20(1):173-87
pubmed: 16278096
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):265
pubmed: 29282043
J Surg Educ. 2019 Nov - Dec;76(6):1451-1455
pubmed: 31129002
Med Sci Educ. 2020 Jun 3;:1-4
pubmed: 32837784
Med Educ Online. 2013 Aug 22;18:21065
pubmed: 23972052
Updates Surg. 2013 Jun;65(2):131-40
pubmed: 23404432
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2016 Jan;116(1):22-34
pubmed: 26745561
Int J Surg. 2012;10(8):393-8
pubmed: 22609475
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 11;9(1):1747
pubmed: 30742018
Med Educ Online. 2015 Jun 03;20:27579
pubmed: 26044400
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun;204(6):542.e1-4
pubmed: 21411056