Machine Learning Based Automated Segmentation and Hybrid Feature Analysis for Diabetic Retinopathy Classification Using Fundus Image.
classification
clustering
diabetic retinopathy
hybrid features
segmentation
Journal
Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1099-4300
Titre abrégé: Entropy (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101243874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 May 2020
19 May 2020
Historique:
received:
23
03
2020
revised:
23
04
2020
accepted:
23
04
2020
entrez:
8
12
2020
pubmed:
9
12
2020
medline:
9
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The object of this study was to demonstrate the ability of machine learning (ML) methods for the segmentation and classification of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Two-dimensional (2D) retinal fundus (RF) images were used. The datasets of DR-that is, the mild, moderate, non-proliferative, proliferative, and normal human eye ones-were acquired from 500 patients at Bahawal Victoria Hospital (BVH), Bahawalpur, Pakistan. Five hundred RF datasets (sized 256 × 256) for each DR stage and a total of 2500 (500 × 5) datasets of the five DR stages were acquired. This research introduces the novel clustering-based automated region growing framework. For texture analysis, four types of features-histogram (H), wavelet (W), co-occurrence matrix (COM) and run-length matrix (RLM)-were extracted, and various ML classifiers were employed, achieving 77.67%, 80%, 89.87%, and 96.33% classification accuracies, respectively. To improve classification accuracy, a fused hybrid-feature dataset was generated by applying the data fusion approach. From each image, 245 pieces of hybrid feature data (H, W, COM, and RLM) were observed, while 13 optimized features were selected after applying four different feature selection techniques, namely Fisher, correlation-based feature selection, mutual information, and probability of error plus average correlation. Five ML classifiers named sequential minimal optimization (SMO), logistic (Lg), multi-layer perceptron (MLP), logistic model tree (LMT), and simple logistic (SLg) were deployed on selected optimized features (using 10-fold cross-validation), and they showed considerably high classification accuracies of 98.53%, 99%, 99.66%, 99.73%, and 99.73%, respectively.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33286339
pii: e22050567
doi: 10.3390/e22050567
pmc: PMC7517087
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Sensors (Basel). 2013 Jul 18;13(7):9248-66
pubmed: 23873409
JAMA. 2016 Dec 13;316(22):2402-2410
pubmed: 27898976
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2017 Sep;26(9):4446-4456
pubmed: 28692956
Molecules. 2017 Nov 23;22(12):
pubmed: 29168750
J Med Syst. 2008 Apr;32(2):107-15
pubmed: 18461814
Eye Vis (Lond). 2015 Sep 30;2:17
pubmed: 26605370
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 10;113(19):E2655-64
pubmed: 27114552
Artif Intell Med. 2019 May;96:93-106
pubmed: 31164214
IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2018 Mar 16;6:2100212
pubmed: 29637029
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Jun 22;17(7):
pubmed: 28640181
Curr Diab Rep. 2015 Mar;15(3):14
pubmed: 25697773
Ophthalmology. 2017 Jul;124(7):962-969
pubmed: 28359545
Diabetes Care. 2019 Apr;42(4):651-656
pubmed: 30765436
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Jun 17;18(6):
pubmed: 29914205
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012 Jun;59(6):1720-6
pubmed: 22481810
IEEE Trans Image Process. 1998;7(12):1673-83
pubmed: 18276234
JCI Insight. 2017 Jul 20;2(14):
pubmed: 28724805
Sensors (Basel). 2014 Sep 01;14(9):16128-47
pubmed: 25256107