Clinical Value of Information Entropy Compared with Deep Learning for Ultrasound Grading of Hepatic Steatosis.
deep learning
fatty liver
hepatic steatosis
information entropy
ultrasound imaging
Journal
Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1099-4300
Titre abrégé: Entropy (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101243874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Sep 2020
09 Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
30
07
2020
revised:
31
08
2020
accepted:
07
09
2020
entrez:
8
12
2020
pubmed:
9
12
2020
medline:
9
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Entropy is a quantitative measure of signal uncertainty and has been widely applied to ultrasound tissue characterization. Ultrasound assessment of hepatic steatosis typically involves a backscattered statistical analysis of signals based on information entropy. Deep learning extracts features for classification without any physical assumptions or considerations in acoustics. In this study, we assessed clinical values of information entropy and deep learning in the grading of hepatic steatosis. A total of 205 participants underwent ultrasound examinations. The image raw data were used for Shannon entropy imaging and for training and testing by the pretrained VGG-16 model, which has been employed for medical data analysis. The entropy imaging and VGG-16 model predictions were compared with histological examinations. The diagnostic performances in grading hepatic steatosis were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the DeLong test. The areas under the ROC curves when using the VGG-16 model to grade mild, moderate, and severe hepatic steatosis were 0.71, 0.75, and 0.88, respectively; those for entropy imaging were 0.68, 0.85, and 0.9, respectively. Ultrasound entropy, which varies with fatty infiltration in the liver, outperformed VGG-16 in identifying participants with moderate or severe hepatic steatosis (
Identifiants
pubmed: 33286775
pii: e22091006
doi: 10.3390/e22091006
pmc: PMC7597079
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : The Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan
ID : MOST 109-2223-E-182-001-MY3
Références
Theranostics. 2019 Oct 12;9(25):7556-7565
pubmed: 31695786
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018 Jul;44(7):1327-1340
pubmed: 29622501
J Digit Imaging. 2017 Apr;30(2):234-243
pubmed: 27896451
Ultrason Imaging. 2018 May;40(3):171-189
pubmed: 29506441
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 14;20(42):15539-48
pubmed: 25400438
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2015 Jun;229(6):419-28
pubmed: 25963386
Hepatol Commun. 2018 Apr 18;2(6):747-759
pubmed: 29881825
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006 May;7(5):373-8
pubmed: 16550215
Med Image Anal. 2017 Dec;42:60-88
pubmed: 28778026
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019 Aug;45(8):1955-1969
pubmed: 31130411
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Nov;10(11):686-90
pubmed: 24042449
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016 May;35(5):1285-98
pubmed: 26886976
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Dec;189(6):W320-3
pubmed: 18029843
Comput Math Methods Med. 2017;2017:3762651
pubmed: 28642804
J Cancer. 2019 Aug 27;10(20):4876-4882
pubmed: 31598159
Nature. 2016 Oct 05;538(7623):20-23
pubmed: 27708329
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004 Oct;28(10):1257-63
pubmed: 15278103
Theranostics. 2020 Mar 4;10(9):4277-4289
pubmed: 32226553
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018 Dec;13(12):1895-1903
pubmed: 30094778
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019 Dec;9(12):1932-1947
pubmed: 31929966
Ultrasonics. 2017 Jan;73:221-230
pubmed: 27668999
J Ultrasound Med. 2020 Jan;39(1):51-59
pubmed: 31222786
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 1;12(8):e0181789
pubmed: 28763461
Ultrasonics. 2020 Feb;101:106001
pubmed: 31505328
Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Sep;94(9):2467-74
pubmed: 10484010
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 20;7:41004
pubmed: 28106118
Nat Med. 2018 Jul;24(7):908-922
pubmed: 29967350