Community acceptability of dolutegravir-based HIV treatment in women: a qualitative study in South Africa and Uganda.
Adolescent
Adult
Female
HIV Infections
/ drug therapy
HIV Integrase Inhibitors
/ adverse effects
Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring
/ adverse effects
Humans
Lactation
Male
Oxazines
/ adverse effects
Piperazines
/ adverse effects
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications
/ chemically induced
Pyridones
/ adverse effects
Qualitative Research
South Africa
Uganda
Young Adult
Acceptability
Dolutegravir-based regimen
HIV treatment
Qualitative study
South Africa
Uganda
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Dec 2020
07 Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
15
05
2020
accepted:
30
11
2020
entrez:
8
12
2020
pubmed:
9
12
2020
medline:
7
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite concerns about dolutegravir use in pregnancy, most low- and middle-income countries are accelerating the introduction of dolutegravir-based regimens into national antiretroviral treatment programmes. Questions remain about the acceptability of dolutegravir use in women due to the potential risks in pregnancy. This study from South Africa and Uganda explored community values, preferences and attitudes towards the use of dolutegravir-based regimens in women. This study employed a qualitative design involving in-depth interviews and focus group discussion conducted between August 2018 to March 2019. The study was conducted in the months following an announcement of a potential risk for neural tube defects with dolutegravir use among women during conception and the first trimester. Participants included HIV positive pregnant and lactating women and their partners. They were selected purposively from urban poor communities in South Africa and Uganda. Data was analysed thematically in NVivo. Forty-four in-depth interviews and 15 focus group discussions were conducted. Most participants had positive views of dolutegravir-based regimens and perceived it to be more desirable compared with efavirenz-containing regimens. There was widespread concern about use of dolutegravir during pregnancy and among women of childbearing age due to publicity around the possible association with neural tube defects. Acceptability was gendered, with nearly all male participants preferring their female spouses of childbearing potential not to use dolutegravir, while most women not planning pregnancy wanted access to contraception alongside dolutegravir. Community awareness and knowledge of dolutegravir was low and characterised by negative information. Women were concerned about HIV-related stigma and wanted the privacy features of dolutegravir to be strengthened with modification of the pill appearance and disguised packaging. Dolutegravir-based regimens were found to be generally acceptable for use in women except during pregnancy. Interest in a dolutegravir-based regimen was linked with its perceived potential to enhance health, privacy and reduce stigma while concerns about neural tube defects were the main potential barrier to dolutegravir uptake in women. In order to optimise the community acceptability and uptake of acceptability-based regimen among women it is critical to strengthen community awareness and understanding of dolutegravir treatment, improve contraception services alongside the introduction of dolutegravir, and engage with male partners.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Despite concerns about dolutegravir use in pregnancy, most low- and middle-income countries are accelerating the introduction of dolutegravir-based regimens into national antiretroviral treatment programmes. Questions remain about the acceptability of dolutegravir use in women due to the potential risks in pregnancy. This study from South Africa and Uganda explored community values, preferences and attitudes towards the use of dolutegravir-based regimens in women.
METHODS
METHODS
This study employed a qualitative design involving in-depth interviews and focus group discussion conducted between August 2018 to March 2019. The study was conducted in the months following an announcement of a potential risk for neural tube defects with dolutegravir use among women during conception and the first trimester. Participants included HIV positive pregnant and lactating women and their partners. They were selected purposively from urban poor communities in South Africa and Uganda. Data was analysed thematically in NVivo.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Forty-four in-depth interviews and 15 focus group discussions were conducted. Most participants had positive views of dolutegravir-based regimens and perceived it to be more desirable compared with efavirenz-containing regimens. There was widespread concern about use of dolutegravir during pregnancy and among women of childbearing age due to publicity around the possible association with neural tube defects. Acceptability was gendered, with nearly all male participants preferring their female spouses of childbearing potential not to use dolutegravir, while most women not planning pregnancy wanted access to contraception alongside dolutegravir. Community awareness and knowledge of dolutegravir was low and characterised by negative information. Women were concerned about HIV-related stigma and wanted the privacy features of dolutegravir to be strengthened with modification of the pill appearance and disguised packaging.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Dolutegravir-based regimens were found to be generally acceptable for use in women except during pregnancy. Interest in a dolutegravir-based regimen was linked with its perceived potential to enhance health, privacy and reduce stigma while concerns about neural tube defects were the main potential barrier to dolutegravir uptake in women. In order to optimise the community acceptability and uptake of acceptability-based regimen among women it is critical to strengthen community awareness and understanding of dolutegravir treatment, improve contraception services alongside the introduction of dolutegravir, and engage with male partners.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33287795
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09991-w
pii: 10.1186/s12889-020-09991-w
pmc: PMC7720619
doi:
Substances chimiques
HIV Integrase Inhibitors
0
Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring
0
Oxazines
0
Piperazines
0
Pyridones
0
dolutegravir
DKO1W9H7M1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1883Subventions
Organisme : Unitaid
ID : 2016-08-UoL
Références
Lancet HIV. 2018 Oct;5(10):e588-e596
pubmed: 30193863
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Jul;6(7):e804-e810
pubmed: 29880310
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013 Nov;52(11):981-94
pubmed: 23824675
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jan 28;10:29
pubmed: 20109210
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 29;381(9):827-840
pubmed: 31329379
AIDS Care. 2006 Nov;18(8):904-10
pubmed: 17012079
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 01;17(3):
pubmed: 32024080
BMC Res Notes. 2018 Sep 10;11(1):661
pubmed: 30201034
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):88
pubmed: 28126032
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jul 25;18(1):57
pubmed: 28743251
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Oct;24(10):1101-8
pubmed: 19653047
Lancet HIV. 2019 Feb;6(2):e116-e127
pubmed: 30503325
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907
pubmed: 29937585
Lancet HIV. 2020 May;7(5):e332-e339
pubmed: 32386721
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 1;20(1):705
pubmed: 32738918
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51
pubmed: 24979285
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004 Dec 15;37(5):1620-6
pubmed: 15577420
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 5;13(1):e0190487
pubmed: 29304154
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 11;13(6):e0197979
pubmed: 29889849
AIDS. 2018 Jul 31;32(12):1551-1561
pubmed: 29746295
Front Pharmacol. 2015 Apr 29;6:90
pubmed: 25972810
AIDS Rev. 2015 Jan-Mar;17(1):56-64
pubmed: 25472016
Ann Intern Med. 2019 May 7;170(9):614-625
pubmed: 30934067
AIDS Behav. 2016 Nov;20(11):2782-2789
pubmed: 27125243