Characterization of the cytokinin sensor TCSv2 in arabidopsis and tomato.
Arabidopsis
Cytokinin
Imaging
TCSv2
Tomato
Two-component sensor (TCS)
Journal
Plant methods
ISSN: 1746-4811
Titre abrégé: Plant Methods
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245798
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Nov 2020
16 Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
24
08
2020
accepted:
04
11
2020
entrez:
9
12
2020
pubmed:
10
12
2020
medline:
10
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Hormones are crucial to plant life and development. Being able to follow the plants hormonal response to various stimuli and throughout developmental processes is an important and increasingly widespread tool. The phytohormone cytokinin (CK) has crucial roles in the regulation of plant growth and development. Here we describe a version of the CK sensor Two Component signaling Sensor (TCS), referred to as TCSv2. TCSv2 has a different arrangement of binding motifs when compared to previous TCS versions, resulting in increased sensitivity in some examined tissues. Here, we examine the CK responsiveness and distribution pattern of TCSv2 in arabidopsis and tomato. The increased sensitivity and reported expression pattern of TCSv2 make it an ideal TCS version to study CK response in particular hosts, such as tomato, and particular tissues, such as leaves and flowers.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Hormones are crucial to plant life and development. Being able to follow the plants hormonal response to various stimuli and throughout developmental processes is an important and increasingly widespread tool. The phytohormone cytokinin (CK) has crucial roles in the regulation of plant growth and development.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Here we describe a version of the CK sensor Two Component signaling Sensor (TCS), referred to as TCSv2. TCSv2 has a different arrangement of binding motifs when compared to previous TCS versions, resulting in increased sensitivity in some examined tissues. Here, we examine the CK responsiveness and distribution pattern of TCSv2 in arabidopsis and tomato.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The increased sensitivity and reported expression pattern of TCSv2 make it an ideal TCS version to study CK response in particular hosts, such as tomato, and particular tissues, such as leaves and flowers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33292327
doi: 10.1186/s13007-020-00694-2
pii: 10.1186/s13007-020-00694-2
pmc: PMC7670716
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
152Références
Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 2001 Jun;52:89-118
pubmed: 11337393
Plant Physiol. 2009 Apr;149(4):1929-44
pubmed: 19218361
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 15;8(11):e79029
pubmed: 24260147
Plant Cell. 2016 Jul;28(7):1602-15
pubmed: 27385816
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2013 Dec 30;942-943:31-6
pubmed: 24212141
Plant Cell. 2005 Jan;17(1):92-102
pubmed: 15608330
J Integr Plant Biol. 2010 Oct;52(10):925-32
pubmed: 20883444
Trends Plant Sci. 2015 May;20(5):291-300
pubmed: 25805047
Molecules. 2010 Dec 15;15(12):9214-29
pubmed: 21160450
Science. 2003 Feb 28;299(5611):1404-7
pubmed: 12610308
New Phytol. 2011 May;190(3):609-17
pubmed: 21244434
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 25;13(4):e0196086
pubmed: 29694399
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Feb 18;7:183
pubmed: 26925087
Anal Chim Acta. 2012 Nov 2;751:176-81
pubmed: 23084068
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 24;11(8):e0161732
pubmed: 27557329
Development. 2007 Jul;134(14):2561-7
pubmed: 17553903
Plant Methods. 2017 Oct 27;13:89
pubmed: 29090013
Phytochem Anal. 2012 Nov-Dec;23(6):559-68
pubmed: 22323190
Development. 2018 Feb 27;145(4):
pubmed: 29487105
Plant Physiol. 2013 Mar;161(3):1066-75
pubmed: 23355633
Plant Physiol. 2000 Oct;124(2):541-52
pubmed: 11027705
Sci STKE. 2007 Oct 09;2007(407):cm5
pubmed: 17925576
Plant J. 2015 Jun;82(5):874-86
pubmed: 25904120
Plant Cell. 2006 Nov;18(11):3073-87
pubmed: 17122069
Curr Biol. 2005 Nov 8;15(21):1899-911
pubmed: 16271866
Nature. 2010 Jun 24;465(7301):1089-92
pubmed: 20577215
Nat Protoc. 2007;2(7):1565-72
pubmed: 17585298
Phytochemistry. 2008 Aug;69(11):2214-24
pubmed: 18561963
Trends Plant Sci. 2019 Feb;24(2):177-185
pubmed: 30446307
Plant Physiol. 2007 Jul;144(3):1240-6
pubmed: 17616507
Nature. 2008 Jun 19;453(7198):1094-7
pubmed: 18463635
Essays Biochem. 2015;58:13-27
pubmed: 26374884
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010;61:49-64
pubmed: 20192736
Plant J. 2006 Mar;45(6):1028-36
pubmed: 16507092
Plant Physiol. 2009 May;150(1):205-16
pubmed: 19321707
Plant Cell. 2014 May 21;26(5):2055-2067
pubmed: 24850849
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009 Oct;12(5):527-38
pubmed: 19740698
Plant Signal Behav. 2012 Jul;7(7):807-10
pubmed: 22751297
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2015 Aug;407(20):6071-9
pubmed: 26025552
Plant Cell Physiol. 2001 Sep;42(9):1017-23
pubmed: 11577198
Curr Biol. 2005 Sep 6;15(17):1560-5
pubmed: 16139211
J Exp Bot. 2016 Dec;67(22):6351-6362
pubmed: 27811005
Plant Cell. 2014 May 21;26(5):2068-2079
pubmed: 24850851
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Jan 05;6:1196
pubmed: 26779229
Development. 2000 Dec;127(24):5523-32
pubmed: 11076771
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jul 11;21(14):
pubmed: 32664520
Nature. 2001 Sep 27;413(6854):383-9
pubmed: 11574878
Methods. 2012 Feb;56(2):174-9
pubmed: 21867755
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:431-49
pubmed: 16669769
Cell Res. 2009 Oct;19(10):1178-90
pubmed: 19621034
Plant Cell. 2010 Oct;22(10):3206-17
pubmed: 20959562
Planta. 1985 Aug;165(2):170-84
pubmed: 24241041
Plant Cell. 2012 Jan;24(1):96-108
pubmed: 22267487
Development. 2011 Feb;138(4):695-704
pubmed: 21228002
Plants (Basel). 2020 Jan 30;9(2):
pubmed: 32019090
Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5
pubmed: 22930834
Anal Chem. 2019 Dec 3;91(23):15049-15056
pubmed: 31660717
Plant Physiol. 2016 Jun;171(2):1485-94
pubmed: 27208284
Mol Genet Genomics. 2007 Feb;277(2):115-37
pubmed: 17061125