Relationship between pre- and post-operative isokinetic strength after ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft.
ACL reconstruction
Isokinetic strength measurements
Pre-habilitation
Return to sport
Journal
BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation
ISSN: 2052-1847
Titre abrégé: BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101605016
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Oct 2020
30 Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
17
06
2020
accepted:
15
10
2020
entrez:
9
12
2020
pubmed:
10
12
2020
medline:
10
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are of major concern in sports. As mostly young and active individuals are affected there is an emphasis on the rapid and safe return to sports (RTS). Strengthening the ventral and dorsal thigh muscles is a prerequisite for a successful RTS after ACL reconstruction (ACLR), as persistent muscle weakness may increase the incidence for secondary injuries and impair performance. Aiming to increase evidence on the importance of preoperative muscle strength and the coaching of patients, the purpose of this study is to compare thigh muscle strength pre- and post-operatively after ACLR. We performed a retrospective analysis of 80 patients with primary, isolated ACLR using a four-stranded hamstring autograft. We performed bilateral isokinetic concentric strength measurement (60°/s) before and six months after ACLR. Primary outcomes were the maximal knee extension and flexion torque, hamstrings-to-quadriceps ratio (H/Q ratio) and the corresponding limb symmetry indices (LSI). Pearson correlations were calculated for pre- and post-surgical values. The operated as well as the unaffected leg increased maximal knee extension (+ 18% ± 7% p < 0.05; + 11% ± 5% p < 0.05) and flexion torque (+ 9% ± 5% p < 0.05, + 10% ± 6% p < 0.05) throughout the 6 months of rehabilitation. The H/Q ratio remained unaffected (- 2% ± 3% p = 0.93; - 4% ± 4% p = 0.27). LSI of knee extension strength increased significantly (6% ± 3% p < 0.05), while flexion strength remained unaffected (+ 2% ± 4% p = 0.27). Positive correlations underline the interrelationship between the strength pre- and post-surgery for the knee extension (r = 0.788 p < 0.05) and knee flexion strength (r = 0.637 p < 0.05) after ACLR. Preoperative leg extension and flexion strength normalized to body mass are strongly correlated to postoperative strength performance after ACLR. Therefore, pre-operative quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength deficits may have a significant negative impact on functional performance following ACLR. This emphasizes the need for intensive preoperative screening and subsequent treatment to achieve the best possible preoperative leg strength before ACLR. DRKS00020210 .
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are of major concern in sports. As mostly young and active individuals are affected there is an emphasis on the rapid and safe return to sports (RTS). Strengthening the ventral and dorsal thigh muscles is a prerequisite for a successful RTS after ACL reconstruction (ACLR), as persistent muscle weakness may increase the incidence for secondary injuries and impair performance. Aiming to increase evidence on the importance of preoperative muscle strength and the coaching of patients, the purpose of this study is to compare thigh muscle strength pre- and post-operatively after ACLR.
METHODS
METHODS
We performed a retrospective analysis of 80 patients with primary, isolated ACLR using a four-stranded hamstring autograft. We performed bilateral isokinetic concentric strength measurement (60°/s) before and six months after ACLR. Primary outcomes were the maximal knee extension and flexion torque, hamstrings-to-quadriceps ratio (H/Q ratio) and the corresponding limb symmetry indices (LSI). Pearson correlations were calculated for pre- and post-surgical values.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The operated as well as the unaffected leg increased maximal knee extension (+ 18% ± 7% p < 0.05; + 11% ± 5% p < 0.05) and flexion torque (+ 9% ± 5% p < 0.05, + 10% ± 6% p < 0.05) throughout the 6 months of rehabilitation. The H/Q ratio remained unaffected (- 2% ± 3% p = 0.93; - 4% ± 4% p = 0.27). LSI of knee extension strength increased significantly (6% ± 3% p < 0.05), while flexion strength remained unaffected (+ 2% ± 4% p = 0.27). Positive correlations underline the interrelationship between the strength pre- and post-surgery for the knee extension (r = 0.788 p < 0.05) and knee flexion strength (r = 0.637 p < 0.05) after ACLR.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Preoperative leg extension and flexion strength normalized to body mass are strongly correlated to postoperative strength performance after ACLR. Therefore, pre-operative quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength deficits may have a significant negative impact on functional performance following ACLR. This emphasizes the need for intensive preoperative screening and subsequent treatment to achieve the best possible preoperative leg strength before ACLR.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
DRKS00020210 .
Identifiants
pubmed: 33292502
doi: 10.1186/s13102-020-00215-7
pii: 10.1186/s13102-020-00215-7
pmc: PMC7602313
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
68Références
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Jan;25(1):172-183
pubmed: 27665093
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Jul;47(7):1426-34
pubmed: 25373481
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Oct 3;94(19):1737-48
pubmed: 23032584
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Sep;53(18):1154-1161
pubmed: 30712009
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Oct;25(10):3213-3219
pubmed: 27553297
J Athl Train. 2010 Jan-Feb;45(1):87-97
pubmed: 20064053
Br J Sports Med. 1996 Jun;30(2):156-60
pubmed: 8799603
Br J Sports Med. 2011 Jun;45(7):596-606
pubmed: 21398310
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;50(13):804-8
pubmed: 27162233
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 May;48(5):790-5
pubmed: 26694845
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Apr;41(4):788-94
pubmed: 23423316
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1991 Feb;70(2):631-40
pubmed: 1827108
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Jan;24(1):236-46
pubmed: 25315083
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Dec;40(3):250-66
pubmed: 19954822
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 May;25(5):1353-1355
pubmed: 28508229
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Jul;42(7):601-14
pubmed: 22402434
Orthop J Sports Med. 2014 Jan 21;2(1):2325967113518305
pubmed: 26535266
J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1982 Aug;53(2):419-24
pubmed: 6288637
J Sports Sci Med. 2002 Sep 01;1(3):56-62
pubmed: 24701125
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Sep;101(2):143-94
pubmed: 17661073
Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Jan 26;5(1):2325967116683941
pubmed: 28203600
J Orthop Res. 2011 Sep;29(9):1383-9
pubmed: 21437965
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Oct;40(10):2348-56
pubmed: 22926749
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Aug;44(8):2030-8
pubmed: 27257127
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 May;88(5):626-31
pubmed: 17466732
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 May;23(5):1283-91
pubmed: 25724802
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999 Dec;31(12):1691-6
pubmed: 10613416
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Jun 13;6(6):2325967118777823
pubmed: 29977938
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Jun;36(6):385-402
pubmed: 16776488
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Oct;48(10):1886-92
pubmed: 27254260
J Strength Cond Res. 2004 Nov;18(4):867-72
pubmed: 15574095
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008 Apr;102(6):739-45
pubmed: 18172672
Sportverletz Sportschaden. 2016 Mar;30(1):38-49
pubmed: 27002707
Br J Sports Med. 2009 May;43(5):371-6
pubmed: 19224907
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;53(5):289-298
pubmed: 30194224
Int J Sports Med. 1993 Jul;14(5):283-7
pubmed: 8365837
J Physiol. 2017 Jul 1;595(13):4127
pubmed: 28459127
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1662-9
pubmed: 25883169