The PLANES study: a protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study of the placental growth factor (PlGF) blood test-informed care versus standard care alone for women with a small for gestational age fetus at or after 32 + 0 weeks' gestation.

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) Intrauterine growth restriction Placenta Placental growth factor Small for gestational age (SGA) Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase

Journal

Pilot and feasibility studies
ISSN: 2055-5784
Titre abrégé: Pilot Feasibility Stud
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101676536

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 04 05 2020
accepted: 03 11 2020
entrez: 9 12 2020
pubmed: 10 12 2020
medline: 10 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Stillbirth remains a major concern across the globe and in some high-resource countries, such as the UK; efforts to reduce the rate have achieved only modest reductions. One third of stillborn babies are small for gestational age (SGA), and these pregnancies are also at risk of neonatal adverse outcomes and lifelong health problems, especially when delivered preterm. Current UK clinical guidance advocates regular monitoring and early term delivery of the SGA fetus; however, the most appropriate regimen for surveillance of these babies remains unclear and often leads to increased intervention for a large number of these women. This pilot trial will determine the feasibility of a large-scale trial refining the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome in SGA pregnancies using biomarkers of placental function sFlt-1/PlGF, identifying and intervening in only those deemed at highest risk of stillbirth. PLANES is a randomised controlled feasibility study of women with an SGA fetus that will be conducted at two tertiary care hospitals in the UK. Once identified on ultrasound, women will be randomised into two groups in a 3:1 ratio in favour of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio led management vs standard care. Women with an SGA fetus and a normal sFlt-1/PlGF ratio will have a repeat ultrasound and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio every 2 weeks with planned birth delayed until 40 weeks. In those women with an SGA fetus and an abnormal sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, we will offer birth from 37 weeks or sooner if there are other concerning features on ultrasound. Women assigned to standard care will have an sFlt-1/PlGF ratio taken, but the results will be concealed from the clinical team, and the woman's pregnancy will be managed as per the local NHS hospital policy. This integrated mixed method study will also involve a health economic analysis and a perspective work package exploring trial feasibility through interviews and questionnaires with participants, their partners, and clinicians. Our aim is to determine feasibility through the assessment of our ability to recruit and retain participants to the study. Results from this pilot study will inform the design of a future large randomised controlled trial that will be adequately powered for adverse pregnancy outcome. Such a study would provide the evidence needed to guide future management of the SGA fetus. ISRCTN58254381 . Registered on 4 July 2019.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Stillbirth remains a major concern across the globe and in some high-resource countries, such as the UK; efforts to reduce the rate have achieved only modest reductions. One third of stillborn babies are small for gestational age (SGA), and these pregnancies are also at risk of neonatal adverse outcomes and lifelong health problems, especially when delivered preterm. Current UK clinical guidance advocates regular monitoring and early term delivery of the SGA fetus; however, the most appropriate regimen for surveillance of these babies remains unclear and often leads to increased intervention for a large number of these women. This pilot trial will determine the feasibility of a large-scale trial refining the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome in SGA pregnancies using biomarkers of placental function sFlt-1/PlGF, identifying and intervening in only those deemed at highest risk of stillbirth.
METHODS METHODS
PLANES is a randomised controlled feasibility study of women with an SGA fetus that will be conducted at two tertiary care hospitals in the UK. Once identified on ultrasound, women will be randomised into two groups in a 3:1 ratio in favour of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio led management vs standard care. Women with an SGA fetus and a normal sFlt-1/PlGF ratio will have a repeat ultrasound and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio every 2 weeks with planned birth delayed until 40 weeks. In those women with an SGA fetus and an abnormal sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, we will offer birth from 37 weeks or sooner if there are other concerning features on ultrasound. Women assigned to standard care will have an sFlt-1/PlGF ratio taken, but the results will be concealed from the clinical team, and the woman's pregnancy will be managed as per the local NHS hospital policy. This integrated mixed method study will also involve a health economic analysis and a perspective work package exploring trial feasibility through interviews and questionnaires with participants, their partners, and clinicians.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
Our aim is to determine feasibility through the assessment of our ability to recruit and retain participants to the study. Results from this pilot study will inform the design of a future large randomised controlled trial that will be adequately powered for adverse pregnancy outcome. Such a study would provide the evidence needed to guide future management of the SGA fetus.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ISRCTN58254381 . Registered on 4 July 2019.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33292754
doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00722-x
pii: 10.1186/s40814-020-00722-x
pmc: PMC7677818
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

179

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : CS-2013-13-009
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Research for Patient Benefit Programme
ID : PB-PG-0817-20021

Références

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004 Sep;83(9):801-7
pubmed: 15315590
Pediatrics. 2013 May;131(5):e1475-81
pubmed: 23589812
Placenta. 2014 Jun;35(6):398-403
pubmed: 24746262
Lancet. 2011 Apr 16;377(9774):1331-40
pubmed: 21496916
Hypertension. 2017 Apr;69(4):731-738
pubmed: 28167687
Lancet. 2015 May 30;385(9983):2162-72
pubmed: 25747582
BMJ. 2005 Nov 12;331(7525):1113-7
pubmed: 16236774
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 25;(11):CD011202
pubmed: 26602956
BJOG. 2018 Jan;125(2):254-262
pubmed: 29152887
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 May;43(5):533-40
pubmed: 24203115
Lancet. 2010 Aug 21;376(9741):631-44
pubmed: 20598363
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;52(1):66-71
pubmed: 28600829
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD007113
pubmed: 22696366
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;42(2):201-6
pubmed: 23303527
BMJ. 2010 Dec 21;341:c7087
pubmed: 21177352
Lancet. 2015 Nov 21;386(10008):2089-2097
pubmed: 26360240
BJOG. 2008 Sep;115(10):1250-5
pubmed: 18715410
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Aug 13;13:161
pubmed: 23937721
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Dec 10;10:81
pubmed: 21143961
Prenat Diagn. 2014 Jul;34(7):618-27
pubmed: 24764257
Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018 Oct;14:228-233
pubmed: 29627351
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;46(6):641-7
pubmed: 26336941
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Feb 13;6:23
pubmed: 32082609
Prenat Diagn. 2014 Jul;34(7):655-9
pubmed: 24839087
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug;126(2):355-62
pubmed: 26241426
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Apr 07;15:86
pubmed: 25884191
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Mar;15(3):209-12
pubmed: 10846776
Arch Dis Child. 2018 Jan;103(1):28-32
pubmed: 28847877
PLoS Med. 2010 Jun 08;7(6):e1000289
pubmed: 20543995
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;117(3):618-26
pubmed: 21343765
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Aug;35(8):741-748
pubmed: 24007710
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;48(5):602-606
pubmed: 27854393
Lancet. 1996 Nov 9;348(9037):1269-73
pubmed: 8909379
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;211(6):669.e1-10
pubmed: 24931475
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Feb;204(2):148.e1-6
pubmed: 21055722
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36
pubmed: 21479777
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e39784
pubmed: 22808059
JAMA. 2011 Dec 14;306(22):2469-79
pubmed: 22166606
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018 Feb;2(2):93-102
pubmed: 30169244
BMJ. 2011 Nov 23;343:d7400
pubmed: 22117057
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Dec;231:220-224
pubmed: 30415129
Horm Res. 2002;57 Suppl 2:88-94
pubmed: 12065935
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 Oct;90(10):1070-81
pubmed: 21682697
PLoS Med. 2014 Apr 22;11(4):e1001633
pubmed: 24755550
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;211(3):288.e1-5
pubmed: 24813969
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 7;374(1):13-22
pubmed: 26735990
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 14;5:CD012245
pubmed: 31087568
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014 Nov;99(6):F451-7
pubmed: 24966128
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Jan;32(2):179-187
pubmed: 28851242
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2014 Oct 16;9:26152
pubmed: 25326092
Circulation. 2013 Nov 5;128(19):2121-31
pubmed: 24190934
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;217(6):682.e1-682.e13
pubmed: 29037482
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Feb;109(2 Pt 1):253-61
pubmed: 17267821
PLoS Med. 2017 Jan 31;14(1):e1002228
pubmed: 28141865
Placenta. 2016 Jun;42:1-8
pubmed: 27238707
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jul;195(1):255-9
pubmed: 16813756
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;49(4):493-499
pubmed: 27486031
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;50(3):353-360
pubmed: 27706856
Trials. 2018 Oct 1;19(1):531
pubmed: 30285835
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;48(5):607-612
pubmed: 27561693
Prenat Diagn. 2014 Jul;34(7):660-7
pubmed: 24810468
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S855-S868
pubmed: 29422214
BMJ Open. 2014 May 15;4(5):e005045
pubmed: 24833694

Auteurs

Joanna Gent (J)

Harris-Wellbeing Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Sian Bullough (S)

Harris-Wellbeing Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Jane Harrold (J)

Harris-Wellbeing Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Richard Jackson (R)

Liverpool Clinical Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Kerry Woolfall (K)

Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Lazaros Andronis (L)

Division of Health Sciences and Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Louise Kenny (L)

Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Christine Cornforth (C)

Harris-Wellbeing Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Alexander E P Heazell (AEP)

Maternal and Fetal Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, 5th Floor (Research), St Mary's Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.

Emily Benbow (E)

Harris-Wellbeing Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Zarko Alfirevic (Z)

Harris-Wellbeing Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Andrew Sharp (A)

Harris-Wellbeing Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. asharp@liv.ac.uk.

Classifications MeSH