Visual process maps to support implementation efforts: a case example.
Goals of Care conversations
Long-term care
Process maps
Journal
Implementation science communications
ISSN: 2662-2211
Titre abrégé: Implement Sci Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101764360
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Nov 2020
25 Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
10
09
2019
accepted:
07
11
2020
entrez:
9
12
2020
pubmed:
10
12
2020
medline:
10
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Process mapping is often used in quality improvement work to examine current processes and workflow and to identify areas to intervene to improve quality. Our objective in this paper is to describe process maps as a visual means of understanding modifiable behaviors and activities, in this case example to ensure that goals of care conversations are part of admitting a veteran in long-term care settings. We completed site visits to 6 VA nursing homes and reviewed their current admission processes. We conducted interviews to document behaviors and activities that occur when a veteran is referred to a long-term care setting, during admission, and during mandatory VA reassessments. We created visualizations of the data using process mapping approaches. Process maps for each site were created to document the admission activities for each VA nursing home and were reviewed by the research team to identify consistencies across sites and to identify potential opportunities for implementing goals of care conversations. We identified five consistent behaviors that take place when a veteran is referred and admitted in long-term care. These behaviors are assessing, discussing, decision-making, documenting, and re-assessing. Based on the process maps, it seems feasible that the LST note and order template could be completed along with other routine assessment processes. However, this will require more robust multi-disciplinary collaboration among both prescribing and non-prescribing health care providers. Completing the LST template during the current admission process would increase the likelihood that the template is completed in a timely manner, potentially alleviate the perceived time burden, and help with the provision of veteran-centered care.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Process mapping is often used in quality improvement work to examine current processes and workflow and to identify areas to intervene to improve quality. Our objective in this paper is to describe process maps as a visual means of understanding modifiable behaviors and activities, in this case example to ensure that goals of care conversations are part of admitting a veteran in long-term care settings.
METHODS
METHODS
We completed site visits to 6 VA nursing homes and reviewed their current admission processes. We conducted interviews to document behaviors and activities that occur when a veteran is referred to a long-term care setting, during admission, and during mandatory VA reassessments. We created visualizations of the data using process mapping approaches. Process maps for each site were created to document the admission activities for each VA nursing home and were reviewed by the research team to identify consistencies across sites and to identify potential opportunities for implementing goals of care conversations.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We identified five consistent behaviors that take place when a veteran is referred and admitted in long-term care. These behaviors are assessing, discussing, decision-making, documenting, and re-assessing.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the process maps, it seems feasible that the LST note and order template could be completed along with other routine assessment processes. However, this will require more robust multi-disciplinary collaboration among both prescribing and non-prescribing health care providers. Completing the LST template during the current admission process would increase the likelihood that the template is completed in a timely manner, potentially alleviate the perceived time burden, and help with the provision of veteran-centered care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33292818
doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00094-6
pii: 10.1186/s43058-020-00094-6
pmc: PMC7687814
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
105Subventions
Organisme : Quality Enhancement Research Initiative
ID : QUE 15-288
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Wagner AD, Crocker J, Liu S, Cherutich P, Gimbel S, Fernandes Q, et al. Making smarter decisions faster: Systems engineering to improve the global public health response to HIV. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2019;16(4):279–91.
doi: 10.1007/s11904-019-00449-2
pubmed: 31197648
pmcid: 6635031
Czaja SJ, Valente TW, Nair SN, Villamar JA, Brown CH. Characterizing implementation strategies using a systems survey and interview tool: a comparison across 10 prevention programs from drug abuse and HIV sexual risk behavior. Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):70.
doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0433-3
pubmed: 27184963
pmcid: 4869203
Wu S, Duan N, Wisdom JP, Kravitz RL, Owen RR, Sullivan JG, et al. Integrating science and engineering to implement evidence-based practices in health care settings. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015;42(5):588–92.
doi: 10.1007/s10488-014-0593-x
pubmed: 25217100
pmcid: 4363001
Sales AE, Ersek M, Intrator OK, Levy C, Carpenter JG, Hogikyan R, et al. Implementing goals of care conversations with veterans in VA long-term care settings: a mixed methods protocol. Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):132.
doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0497-0
pubmed: 27682236
pmcid: 5041212
Hojlo C. The VA’s transformation of nursing home care: from nursing homes to community living centers. Generations. 2010;34:43–8.
Morris JN, Hawes C, Fries BE, Phillips CD, Mor V, Katz S, et al. Designing the national resident assessment instrument for nursing homes. Gerontologist. 1990;30(3):293–307.
doi: 10.1093/geront/30.3.293
pubmed: 2354790
Colligan L, Anderson JE, Potts HWW, Berman J. Does the process map influence the outcome of quality improvement work? A comparison of a sequential flow diagram and a hierarchical task analysis diagram. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:7.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-7
pubmed: 20056005
pmcid: 2822834
Kim CS, Spahlinger DA, Kin JM, Billi JE. Lean health care: what can hospitals learn from a world-class automaker? J Hosp Med. 2006;1(3):191–9.
doi: 10.1002/jhm.68
pubmed: 17219493
Nelson EC, Batalden PB, Godfrey MM. Quality by design: a clinical microsystems approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Wiley; 2007.
Flottorp SA, Oxman AD, Krause J, et al. A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: a systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practice. Implement Sci. 2013;8:35.
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-35
pubmed: 23522377
pmcid: 3617095
Ritchie MJ, Dollar KM, Miller CJ, Oliver KA, Smith JL, Lindsay JA, Kirchner JE. Using implementation facilitation to improve care in the Veterans Health Administration (version 2). In: Veterans Health Administration, Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) for Team-Based Behavioral Health; 2017. Available at: https://www.queri.research.va.gov/tools/implementation/Facilitation-Manual.pdf .
Nathan AT, Kaplan HC. Tools and methods for quality improvement and patient safety in perinatal care. Semin Perinatol. 2017;41(3):142–50.
doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2017.03.002
pubmed: 28552386
Powell BJ, Beidas RS, Lewis CC, et al. Methods to improve the selection and tailoring of implementation strategies. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2017;44(2):177–94.
doi: 10.1007/s11414-015-9475-6
pubmed: 26289563
pmcid: 4761530
Standiford T, Conte ML, Billi JE, Sales A, Barnes GD. Integrating lean thinking and implementation science determinants checklists for quality improvement: a scoping review. Am J Med Qual. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860619879746 .
Dellifraine JL, Langabeer JR, Nembhard IM. Asessing the evidence of six sigma and lean in the health care industry. Qual Manag Health Care. 2010;19(3):211–25.
doi: 10.1097/QMH.0b013e3181eb140e
pubmed: 20588140