Registered dietitians' beliefs and behaviours related to counselling patients on physical activity and sedentary behaviour from a theory of planned behaviour perspective.

Counsel Dietitian Physical activity Qualitative Sedentary Theory of planned behaviour

Journal

BMC nutrition
ISSN: 2055-0928
Titre abrégé: BMC Nutr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672434

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 04 06 2020
accepted: 26 10 2020
entrez: 9 12 2020
pubmed: 10 12 2020
medline: 10 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Registered dietitians working in team-based primary care settings (e.g., family health teams [FHTs]) are positioned to counsel on physical activity and sedentary behaviour when providing nutrition-related services to promote health and prevent disease. This qualitative study explored FHT registered dietitians' beliefs and behaviours related to counselling patients on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Twenty registered dietitians in FHTs in Ontario, Canada were interviewed in person. Theory of planned behaviour guided the development of this cross-sectional, descriptive study. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes within each of the following theoretical constructs (topics): registered dietitians' behaviour (practice), behavioural intention, attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioural control related to physical activity and sedentary behaviour counselling. All participants counselled patients on physical activity, using some motivational interviewing strategies, and most counselled on sedentary behaviour. Many participants intended to continue their current physical activity counselling practices and increase sedentary behaviour counselling. Some participants had a positive attitude about the effectiveness of counselling on physical activity and sedentary behaviour, but their belief about effectiveness was dependent on factors such as time frame for behaviour change. Many participants felt that other health care professionals expected them to counsel on physical activity and they believed that other registered dietitians counsel on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Facilitators to counselling included FHT dynamics and time with patients. In terms of barriers, almost all participants were confident in basic PA counselling only and contended that only this is within their scope of practice. Many participants posited that exercise prescription is outside their scope of practice. Other barriers included registered dietitians' lack of knowledge and not having a physical activity expert on the team. The results suggest that strategies are warranted to improve FHT registered dietitians' knowledge, attitude, and counselling skills related to physical activity and sedentary behaviour. This study provides a strong foundation to develop a theory-based, quantitative measure to assess physical activity and sedentary behaviour counselling practices and determinants among registered dietitians.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Registered dietitians working in team-based primary care settings (e.g., family health teams [FHTs]) are positioned to counsel on physical activity and sedentary behaviour when providing nutrition-related services to promote health and prevent disease. This qualitative study explored FHT registered dietitians' beliefs and behaviours related to counselling patients on physical activity and sedentary behaviour.
METHODS METHODS
Twenty registered dietitians in FHTs in Ontario, Canada were interviewed in person. Theory of planned behaviour guided the development of this cross-sectional, descriptive study. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes within each of the following theoretical constructs (topics): registered dietitians' behaviour (practice), behavioural intention, attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioural control related to physical activity and sedentary behaviour counselling.
RESULTS RESULTS
All participants counselled patients on physical activity, using some motivational interviewing strategies, and most counselled on sedentary behaviour. Many participants intended to continue their current physical activity counselling practices and increase sedentary behaviour counselling. Some participants had a positive attitude about the effectiveness of counselling on physical activity and sedentary behaviour, but their belief about effectiveness was dependent on factors such as time frame for behaviour change. Many participants felt that other health care professionals expected them to counsel on physical activity and they believed that other registered dietitians counsel on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Facilitators to counselling included FHT dynamics and time with patients. In terms of barriers, almost all participants were confident in basic PA counselling only and contended that only this is within their scope of practice. Many participants posited that exercise prescription is outside their scope of practice. Other barriers included registered dietitians' lack of knowledge and not having a physical activity expert on the team.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The results suggest that strategies are warranted to improve FHT registered dietitians' knowledge, attitude, and counselling skills related to physical activity and sedentary behaviour. This study provides a strong foundation to develop a theory-based, quantitative measure to assess physical activity and sedentary behaviour counselling practices and determinants among registered dietitians.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33292838
doi: 10.1186/s40795-020-00392-1
pii: 10.1186/s40795-020-00392-1
pmc: PMC7702673
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

66

Références

NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Dec;27(1):2
pubmed: 28108747
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Jun 10;14(1):75
pubmed: 28599680
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Feb;86(2):140-157
pubmed: 29265832
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Oct;61(7):1516-28
pubmed: 16005784
Clin Rehabil. 2014 Dec;28(12):1159-71
pubmed: 24942478
Can J Diet Pract Res. 2006 Autumn;Suppl:S39-46
pubmed: 17020642
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017 Sep;32(5):541-556
pubmed: 28708630
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Apr;98(4):412-9
pubmed: 25499578
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 21;9(8):e105620
pubmed: 25144686
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 09;15:344
pubmed: 25885709
Fam Pract. 2014 Aug;31(4):389-98
pubmed: 24891472
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jul 9;15(1):65
pubmed: 29986718
J Sports Sci Med. 2011 Sep 01;10(3):426-31
pubmed: 24150613
Appetite. 2014 Apr;75:157-64
pubmed: 24462493
J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Sep;7(3):388-94
pubmed: 26457144
Int J Behav Med. 2015 Feb;22(1):32-50
pubmed: 24788314
Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Apr;55(513):305-12
pubmed: 15826439
Br J Sports Med. 2014 Oct;48(19):1451-5
pubmed: 22976910
Can J Diet Pract Res. 2015 Jun;76(2):76-80
pubmed: 26067416
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2014;10(1):36-52
pubmed: 26213523
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2007 Feb;20(1):37-40
pubmed: 17241191
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Nov;45(5):649-57
pubmed: 24139780
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Oct;101(10):1775-1785
pubmed: 29793786
Eur J Epidemiol. 2018 Sep;33(9):811-829
pubmed: 29589226
Can Fam Physician. 2013 Jan;59(1):e26-32
pubmed: 23341676
Health Rep. 2019 Aug 21;30(8):3-10
pubmed: 31454407
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Jun;28(11-12):2296-2308
pubmed: 30791160
BMC Public Health. 2017 Feb 2;17(1):159
pubmed: 28153053
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Sep;41(9):1008-11
pubmed: 27560541
J Prim Prev. 2014 Jun;35(3):193-201
pubmed: 24682887
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013 Jul;113(7):972-9
pubmed: 23790411
Br J Sports Med. 2012 Jul;46(9):625-31
pubmed: 22711796
Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Dec;88(12):1446-61
pubmed: 24290119
Can J Diet Pract Res. 2006 Autumn;Suppl:S14-29
pubmed: 17020639
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2004 Feb;17(1):63-9
pubmed: 14718033
Can J Diet Pract Res. 2004 Winter;65(4):154-60
pubmed: 15596033
Pediatrics. 2015 Apr;135(4):649-57
pubmed: 25825539
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Apr 23;13:31
pubmed: 22524484
J Behav Med. 2014 Aug;37(4):768-80
pubmed: 23934180
Prev Med. 2014 Dec;69:75-9
pubmed: 25230367

Auteurs

Jessica Huntington (J)

Department of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, Macdonald Institute Building, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada.

John J M Dwyer (JJM)

Department of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, Macdonald Institute Building, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada. dwyer@uoguelph.ca.

Sara Shama (S)

Department of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, Macdonald Institute Building, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada.

Paula Brauer (P)

Department of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, Macdonald Institute Building, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada.

Classifications MeSH