Development of a comprehensive measure of organizational readiness (motivation × capacity) for implementation: a study protocol.
Colorectal cancer screening implementation
Implementation measurement
Interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation
R = MC2
Readiness
Journal
Implementation science communications
ISSN: 2662-2211
Titre abrégé: Implement Sci Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101764360
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Nov 2020
11 Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
09
10
2020
accepted:
19
10
2020
entrez:
9
12
2020
pubmed:
10
12
2020
medline:
10
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Organizational readiness is important for the implementation of evidence-based interventions. Currently, there is a critical need for a comprehensive, valid, reliable, and pragmatic measure of organizational readiness that can be used throughout the implementation process. This study aims to develop a readiness measure that can be used to support implementation in two critical public health settings: federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and schools. The measure is informed by the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation and R = MC For aim 1, we will conduct a series of qualitative interviews to adapt the readiness measure for use in FQHCs. We will then distribute the readiness measure to a developmental sample of 100 health center sites (up to 10 staff members per site). We will use a multilevel factor analysis approach to refine the readiness measure. For aim 2, we will distribute the measure to a different sample of 100 health center sites. We will use multilevel confirmatory factor analysis models to examine the structural validity. We will also conduct tests for scale reliability, test-retest reliability, and inter-rater reliability. For aim 3, we will use a qualitative approach to adapt the measure for use in schools and conduct reliability and validity tests similar to what is described in aim 2. This study will rigorously develop a readiness measure that will be applicable across two settings: FQHCs and schools. Information gained from the readiness measure can inform planning and implementation efforts by identifying priority areas. These priority areas can inform the selection and tailoring of support strategies that can be used throughout the implementation process to further improve implementation efforts and, in turn, program effectiveness.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Organizational readiness is important for the implementation of evidence-based interventions. Currently, there is a critical need for a comprehensive, valid, reliable, and pragmatic measure of organizational readiness that can be used throughout the implementation process. This study aims to develop a readiness measure that can be used to support implementation in two critical public health settings: federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and schools. The measure is informed by the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation and R = MC
METHODS
METHODS
For aim 1, we will conduct a series of qualitative interviews to adapt the readiness measure for use in FQHCs. We will then distribute the readiness measure to a developmental sample of 100 health center sites (up to 10 staff members per site). We will use a multilevel factor analysis approach to refine the readiness measure. For aim 2, we will distribute the measure to a different sample of 100 health center sites. We will use multilevel confirmatory factor analysis models to examine the structural validity. We will also conduct tests for scale reliability, test-retest reliability, and inter-rater reliability. For aim 3, we will use a qualitative approach to adapt the measure for use in schools and conduct reliability and validity tests similar to what is described in aim 2.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
This study will rigorously develop a readiness measure that will be applicable across two settings: FQHCs and schools. Information gained from the readiness measure can inform planning and implementation efforts by identifying priority areas. These priority areas can inform the selection and tailoring of support strategies that can be used throughout the implementation process to further improve implementation efforts and, in turn, program effectiveness.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33292840
doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00088-4
pii: 10.1186/s43058-020-00088-4
pmc: PMC7656510
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
103Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA228527
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : T32 CA057712
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : 1R01CA228527-01A1
Pays : United States
Références
Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Sep;52(9):1190-7
pubmed: 11533392
BMJ. 2014 Jul 29;349:g4490
pubmed: 25073782
Health Educ Behav. 2018 Dec;45(6):1008-1015
pubmed: 29991294
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 04;9(12):e114338
pubmed: 25474622
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Aug;5(8):726-727
pubmed: 32569576
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Oct;86(5):811-24
pubmed: 11596799
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):171-81
pubmed: 18302018
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012 Mar;42(2):179-90
pubmed: 22154030
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010 Feb;18 Suppl 1:S36-44
pubmed: 20107459
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Mar;67(2):100-121
pubmed: 28170086
J Community Psychol. 2015 Apr;43(4):484-501
pubmed: 26668443
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Sep 30;11:248
pubmed: 21961925
Psychol Methods. 2014 Mar;19(1):72-91
pubmed: 23646988
J Sch Health. 2017 Apr;87(4):286-295
pubmed: 28260244
J Prim Prev. 2015 Aug;36(4):281-6
pubmed: 26070256
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Mar 13;69(10):253-259
pubmed: 32163384
Prev Med. 2016 Oct;91:8-17
pubmed: 27471022
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Aug 11;:
pubmed: 32780851
MMWR Suppl. 2016 Feb 12;65(1):21-8
pubmed: 26915961
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 11;20(1):106
pubmed: 32046708
Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Oct;96(4):889-901
pubmed: 22952187
J Community Psychol. 2019 May;47(4):882-897
pubmed: 30688369
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;51(4):423-31
pubmed: 22449648
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Jul;153(7):695-704
pubmed: 10401802
Obes Rev. 2011 May;12(5):e143-50
pubmed: 20633234
BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Aug 23;11:60
pubmed: 20731817
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014 Aug 8;63(31):671-6
pubmed: 25102415
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan;283:112629
pubmed: 31735374
Psychol Addict Behav. 2011 Jun;25(2):194-205
pubmed: 21443291
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013 Nov-Dec;45(6):499-509
pubmed: 23958208
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002 Jun;22(4):171-82
pubmed: 12072162
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):182-96
pubmed: 18307028
Int J Integr Care. 2016 Aug 31;16(3):15
pubmed: 28413366
Implement Sci. 2009 Oct 19;4:67
pubmed: 19840381
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 1;46(3):1029-1056
pubmed: 28338764
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):206-24
pubmed: 18278551
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Jan;38(1):4-23
pubmed: 21197565
Community Ment Health J. 2013 Feb;49(1):86-94
pubmed: 22290304
Control Clin Trials. 2002 Aug;23(4):409-21
pubmed: 12161083
Adv Neonatal Care. 2006 Jun;6(3):104-11
pubmed: 16750804
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Nov;45(5):644-8
pubmed: 24139779
Implement Sci. 2013 Mar 24;8:38
pubmed: 23522556
Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581-629
pubmed: 15595944
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002 Jun;22(4):197-209
pubmed: 12072164
Med Care Res Rev. 2008 Aug;65(4):379-436
pubmed: 18511812
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2564-2575
pubmed: 27304597
Qual Health Res. 2002 Jul;12(6):855-66
pubmed: 12109729
Cancer Causes Control. 2019 Feb;30(2):169-175
pubmed: 30552592
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Oct 10;16:E139
pubmed: 31603404