Maxillary sinus augmentation with three different biomaterials: Histological, histomorphometric, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes from a randomized controlled trial.
biomaterial(s)
bone graft(s)
bone regeneration
implantology
osseointegration
Journal
Clinical implant dentistry and related research
ISSN: 1708-8208
Titre abrégé: Clin Implant Dent Relat Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100888977
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
08
08
2020
revised:
16
09
2020
accepted:
30
10
2020
pubmed:
10
12
2020
medline:
26
2
2021
entrez:
9
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Lateral maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA) is a predictable bone regeneration technique in case of atrophy of the posterior-upper maxilla. Aimed at obtaining quantity and quality of bone suitable for receiving osseointegrated implants, its success is largely due to the skill of the surgeon, but also to the characteristics of the biomaterial used. Twenty-four patients needing MSA were included in the study. The patients were randomly allocated to three different groups: anorganic bovine bone mineral as control, tricalcium phosphate with or without hyaluronic acid (HA) as test groups. Nine months after MSA, bone biopsies were harvested for the histomorphometric analysis. Secondary outcomes were mean bone gain, intraoperative and postoperative complications, implant insertion torque, implant failure, and patient-reported outcome measures. Although the percentage of new bone was not statistically different between the three groups (P = .191), the percentages of residual biomaterial was significantly higher (P < .000) and nonmineralized tissue significantly lower (P < .000) in the control than in the test groups. Test groups did not differ significantly from each other for all histomorphometric parameters. The implant insertion torque was significantly higher in the control group (P < .0005). The rest of the secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the groups. MSA is a safe and predictable procedure in terms of histological, clinical, and PROAMs, regardless of the biomaterial used. The addition of HA did not influence the outcomes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Lateral maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA) is a predictable bone regeneration technique in case of atrophy of the posterior-upper maxilla. Aimed at obtaining quantity and quality of bone suitable for receiving osseointegrated implants, its success is largely due to the skill of the surgeon, but also to the characteristics of the biomaterial used.
METHODS
METHODS
Twenty-four patients needing MSA were included in the study. The patients were randomly allocated to three different groups: anorganic bovine bone mineral as control, tricalcium phosphate with or without hyaluronic acid (HA) as test groups. Nine months after MSA, bone biopsies were harvested for the histomorphometric analysis. Secondary outcomes were mean bone gain, intraoperative and postoperative complications, implant insertion torque, implant failure, and patient-reported outcome measures.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Although the percentage of new bone was not statistically different between the three groups (P = .191), the percentages of residual biomaterial was significantly higher (P < .000) and nonmineralized tissue significantly lower (P < .000) in the control than in the test groups. Test groups did not differ significantly from each other for all histomorphometric parameters. The implant insertion torque was significantly higher in the control group (P < .0005). The rest of the secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the groups.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
MSA is a safe and predictable procedure in terms of histological, clinical, and PROAMs, regardless of the biomaterial used. The addition of HA did not influence the outcomes.
Substances chimiques
Bone Substitutes
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
86-95Informations de copyright
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Aghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(Suppl):49-70.
Elnayef B, Porta C, Fernando MS, et al. The fate of lateral ridge augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(3):622-635.
Corbella S, Taschieri S, del Fabbro M. Long-term outcomes for the treatment of atrophic posterior maxilla: a systematic review of literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(1):120-132. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/cid.12077.
Jensen T, Schou S, Gundersen HJG, Forman JL, Terheyden H, Holmstrup P. Bone-to-implant contact after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss and autogenous bone in different ratios in mini pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(6):635-644. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02438.x.
Nkenke E, Stelzle F. Clinical outcomes of sinus floor augmentation for implant placement using autogenous bone or bone substitutes: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:124-133. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01776.x.
Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35:216-240. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01272.x.
Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg. 1980;38:613-616. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10019575083/.
Tatum O. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstruction. Dent Clin N Am. 1986;30:207-229.
Valente NA. Anatomical considerations on the alveolar antral artery as related to the sinus augmentation surgical procedure. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016;18(5):1042-1050.
van den Bergh JP, ten Bruggenkate CM, Disch FJ, Tuinzing DB. Anatomical aspects of sinus floor elevations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11:256-265.
Testori T, Weinstein T, Taschieri S, Wallace SS. Risk factors in lateral window sinus elevation surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2019;81(1):91-123.
Danesh-Sani SA, Engebretson SP, Janal MN. Histomorphometric results of different grafting materials and effect of healing time on bone maturation after sinus floor augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontal Res. 2017;52(3):301-312.
Imai H, Lang N, Ferri M, Hirota A, Alccayhuaman K. Tomographic assessment on the influence of the use of a collagen membrane on dimensional variations to protect the antrostomy after maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020;35(2):350-356.
Kawakami S, Lang NP, Iida T, Ferri M, Apaza Alccayhuaman KA, Botticelli D. Influence of the position of the antrostomy in sinus floor elevation assessed with cone-beam computed tomography: a randomized clinical trial. J Investig Clin Dent. 2018;9(4):e12362.
Kawakami S, Lang NP, Ferri M, Alccayhuaman KAA, Botticelli D. Influence of the height of the antrostomy in sinus floor elevation assessed by cone beam computed tomography: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34(1):223-232.
Hirota A, Lang NP, Ferri M, Fortich Mesa N, Apaza Alccayhuaman KA, Botticelli D. Tomographic evaluation of the influence of the placement of a collagen membrane subjacent to the sinus mucosa during maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Implant Dent. 2019;5(1):31.
Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;25(4):284-290. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00941.x.
Buser DA, Weber H-P, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1990;1(1):33-40.
Corbella S, Taschieri S, Weinstein R, del Fabbro M. Histomorphometric outcomes after lateral sinus floor elevation procedure: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(9):1106-1122.
Imai H, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Ferri M, Alccayhuaman K, Botticelli D. Influence of the dimensions of the antrostomy on osseointegration of mini-implants placed in the grafted region after sinus floor elevation: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020;35(3):591-598.
Hirota A, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, et al. Influence of the position of the antrostomy in sinus floor elevation on the healing of mini-implants: a randomized clinical trial. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;24(3):299-308.
Tanaka K, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, et al. Sinus floor elevation and antrostomy healing: a Histomorphometric clinical study in humans. Implant Dent. 2019;28(6):537-542.
Boëck-Neto RJ, Real Gabrielli MF, Shibli JA, Marcantonio E, Comelli Lia RC, Marcantonio E. Histomorphometric evaluation of human sinus floor augmentation healing responses to placement of calcium phosphate or Ricinus communis polymer associated with autogenous bone. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7(4):181-188.
Wagner W, Wiltfang J, Pistner H, et al. Bone formation with a biphasic calcium phosphate combined with fibrin sealant in maxillary sinus floor elevation for delayed dental implant. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(9):1112-1117.
Haugen HJ, Lyngstadaas SP, Rossi F, Perale G. Bone grafts: which is the ideal biomaterial? J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46(S21):92-102.
Park J. Bioceramics: Properties, Characterizations, and Applications. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media; 2008.
Huang Q, Wang L, Wang J. Mechanical properties of artificial materials for bone repair. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci. 2014;19(6):675-680. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12204-014-1565-8.
Laurencin C, Khan Y, Veronick J. Bone graft substitutes: past, present, and future. Bone Graft Substitutes and Bone Regenerative Engineering. 2nd ed. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2014:1-9.
Asparuhova MB, Chappuis V, Stähli A, Buser D, Sculean A. Role of hyaluronan in regulating self-renewal and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells and pre-osteoblasts. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:3923-3937.
Mendes RM, Silva GAB, Lima MF, et al. Sodium hyaluronate accelerates the healing process in tooth sockets of rats. Arch Oral Biol. 2008;53(12):1155-1162.
Kim J-J, Song HY, ben Amara H, Kyung-Rim K, Koo K-T. Hyaluronic acid improves bone formation in extraction sockets with chronic pathology: a pilot study in dogs. J Periodontol. 2016;87(7):790-795.
Alcântara CEP, Castro MAA, Noronha MS d, et al. Hyaluronic acid accelerates bone repair in human dental sockets: a randomized triple-blind clinical trial. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e84.
Lorenz J, Barbeck M, Kirkpatrick C, Sader R, Lerner H, Ghanaati S. Injectable bone substitute material on the basis of β-TCP and hyaluronan achieves complete bone regeneration while undergoing nearly complete degradation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(3):636-644.
Knabe C, Khattab DA, Kluk E, Struck R, Stiller M. Effect of a particulate and a putty-like tricalcium phosphate-based bone-grafting material on bone formation, volume stability and osteogenic marker expression after bilateral sinus floor augmentation in humans. J Funct Biomater. 2017;8(3):31.
Stacchi C, Lombardi T, Ottonelli R, Berton F, Perinetti G, Traini T. New bone formation after transcrestal sinus floor elevation was influenced by sinus cavity dimensions: a prospective histologic and histomorphometric study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(5):465-479.
Fouad W, Osman A, Atef M, Hakam M. Guided maxillary sinus floor elevation using deproteinized bovine bone versus graftless Schneiderian membrane elevation with simultaneous implant placement: randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(3):424-433.
Santagata M, Tozzi U, Tartaro G, et al. Maxillary sinus augmentation with autologous and heterologous bone graft: a clinical and radiographic report of immediate and delayed implant placement. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2014;13(4):401-408.
Raghoebar GM, Onclin P, Boven GC, Vissink A, Meijer HJA. Long-term effectiveness of maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46(S21):307-318.
Younes F, Cosyn J, de Bruyckere T, Cleymaet R, Eghbali A. A 2-year prospective case series on volumetric changes, PROMs, and clinical outcomes following sinus floor elevation using deproteinized bovine bone mineral as filling material. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21(2):301-309.
Farzadmoghadam M, Mohammadi TM, Goudarzi R, Mohammadi M, Hasheminejad N. Is there a relationship between general and oral health-related quality of life in partially edentulous patients before and after implant treatment? A quasi-experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(6):557-564.
Zucoloto ML, Maroco J, Campos JADB. Impact of oral health on health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2016;16(1):2-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0211-2.