Reliability and limits of transport-ventilators to safely ventilate severe patients in special surge situations.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome COVID-19 Mechanical ventilation Respiratory failure Respiratory mechanics

Journal

Annals of intensive care
ISSN: 2110-5820
Titre abrégé: Ann Intensive Care
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101562873

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Dec 2020
Historique:
received: 19 09 2020
accepted: 25 11 2020
entrez: 9 12 2020
pubmed: 10 12 2020
medline: 10 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Intensive Care Units (ICU) have sometimes been overwhelmed by the surge of COVID-19 patients. Extending ICU capacity can be limited by the lack of air and oxygen pressure sources available. Transport ventilators requiring only one O To evaluate the performances of four transport ventilators and an ICU ventilator in simulated severe respiratory conditions. Two pneumatic transport ventilators, (Oxylog 3000, Draeger; Osiris 3, Air Liquide Medical Systems), two turbine transport ventilators (Elisee 350, ResMed; Monnal T60, Air Liquide Medical Systems) and an ICU ventilator (Engström Carestation-GE Healthcare) were evaluated on a Michigan test lung. We tested each ventilator with different set volumes (Vt Grouping all conditions, the volume error was 2.9 ± 2.2% for Engström Carestation; 3.6 ± 3.9% for Osiris 3; 2.5 ± 2.1% for Oxylog 3000; 5.4 ± 2.7% for Monnal T60 and 8.8 ± 4.8% for Elisee 350. Grouping all conditions (P In surge situations such as COVID-19 pandemic, transport ventilators may be used to accurately control delivered volumes in locations, where only oxygen pressure supply is available. Performances regarding triggering function are acceptable for three out of the four transport ventilators tested.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Intensive Care Units (ICU) have sometimes been overwhelmed by the surge of COVID-19 patients. Extending ICU capacity can be limited by the lack of air and oxygen pressure sources available. Transport ventilators requiring only one O
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the performances of four transport ventilators and an ICU ventilator in simulated severe respiratory conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
Two pneumatic transport ventilators, (Oxylog 3000, Draeger; Osiris 3, Air Liquide Medical Systems), two turbine transport ventilators (Elisee 350, ResMed; Monnal T60, Air Liquide Medical Systems) and an ICU ventilator (Engström Carestation-GE Healthcare) were evaluated on a Michigan test lung. We tested each ventilator with different set volumes (Vt
RESULTS RESULTS
Grouping all conditions, the volume error was 2.9 ± 2.2% for Engström Carestation; 3.6 ± 3.9% for Osiris 3; 2.5 ± 2.1% for Oxylog 3000; 5.4 ± 2.7% for Monnal T60 and 8.8 ± 4.8% for Elisee 350. Grouping all conditions (P
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In surge situations such as COVID-19 pandemic, transport ventilators may be used to accurately control delivered volumes in locations, where only oxygen pressure supply is available. Performances regarding triggering function are acceptable for three out of the four transport ventilators tested.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33296045
doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00782-5
pii: 10.1186/s13613-020-00782-5
pmc: PMC7724620
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

166

Références

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 May 15;201(10):1299-1300
pubmed: 32228035
Respir Care. 2013 Nov;58(11):1911-22
pubmed: 23592785
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Dec;36(12):2074-80
pubmed: 20862452
JAMA. 2020 Apr 28;323(16):1574-1581
pubmed: 32250385
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug 15;202(4):600-604
pubmed: 32515988
Crit Care Resusc. 2020 Sep;22(3):266-270
pubmed: 32900334
Chest. 2012 Aug;142(2):367-376
pubmed: 22406958
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Jan;157(1):135-43
pubmed: 9445291
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Aug;35(8):1368-76
pubmed: 19352622
Intensive Care Med. 2002 Apr;28(4):443-51
pubmed: 11967599
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 May 15;201(10):1294-1297
pubmed: 32200645
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2049-2055
pubmed: 32202722
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct 15;202(8):1079-1080
pubmed: 32881583
Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Sep 13;9(1):104
pubmed: 31520230
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 May 1;201(9):1086-1098
pubmed: 32097569
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jun;46(6):1099-1102
pubmed: 32291463
Crit Care. 2014 Oct 15;18(5):506
pubmed: 25672675
Intensive Care Med. 2002 Aug;28(8):1181; author reply 1182
pubmed: 12400512
Intensive Care Med. 2002 Aug;28(8):1049-57
pubmed: 12185424
Intensive Care Med. 2007 Aug;33(8):1444-51
pubmed: 17563875
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Jul;115(1):89-98
pubmed: 25735713

Auteurs

Dominique Savary (D)

Emergency Department, University Hospital of Angers, 4, Rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 9, France. dominique.savary@chu-angers.fr.
Inserm, EHESP, University of Rennes, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail) - UMR_S 1085, 49000, Angers, France. dominique.savary@chu-angers.fr.

Arnaud Lesimple (A)

CNRS, INSERM 1083, MITOVASC, Université d'Angers, Angers, France.
Med2Lab, ALMS, Antony, France.

François Beloncle (F)

Critical Care Department, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.

François Morin (F)

Emergency Department, University Hospital of Angers, 4, Rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 9, France.

François Templier (F)

Emergency Department, University Hospital of Angers, 4, Rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 9, France.

Alexandre Broc (A)

The Telecom-Physic-Strasbourg, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg , France.

Laurent Brochard (L)

Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Jean-Christophe Richard (JC)

Critical Care Department, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
INSERM, UMR 955 Eq 13, Toronto, Canada.

Alain Mercat (A)

Critical Care Department, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.

Classifications MeSH