Phase I Study of Afatinib and Selumetinib in Patients with KRAS-Mutated Colorectal, Non-Small Cell Lung, and Pancreatic Cancer.


Journal

The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2021
Historique:
received: 07 11 2020
accepted: 30 11 2020
pubmed: 10 12 2020
medline: 22 6 2021
entrez: 9 12 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Afatinib and selumetinib can be combined in continuous and intermittent dosing schedules, albeit at lower doses than approved for monotherapy. Maximum tolerated dose for continuous and intermittent schedules is afatinib 20 mg once daily and selumetinib 25 mg b.i.d. Because the anticancer activity was limited, further development of this combination is not recommended until better biomarkers for response and resistance are defined. Antitumor effects of MEK inhibitors are limited in KRAS-mutated tumors because of feedback activation of upstream epidermal growth factor receptors, which reactivates the MAPK and the phosphoinositide 3-kinase-AKT pathway. Therefore, this phase I trial was initiated with the pan-HER inhibitor afatinib plus the MEK inhibitor selumetinib in patients with KRAS mutant, PIK3CA wild-type tumors. Afatinib and selumetinib were administered according to a 3+3 design in continuous and intermittent schedules. The primary objective was safety, and the secondary objective was clinical efficacy. Twenty-six patients were enrolled with colorectal cancer (n = 19), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (n = 6), and pancreatic cancer (n = 1). Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in six patients, including grade 3 diarrhea, dehydration, decreased appetite, nausea, vomiting, and mucositis. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was 20 mg afatinib once daily (QD) and 25 mg selumetinib b.i.d. (21 days on/7 days off) for continuous afatinib dosing and for intermittent dosing with both drugs 5 days on/2 days off. Efficacy was limited with disease stabilization for 221 days in a patient with NSCLC as best response. Afatinib and selumetinib can be combined in continuous and intermittent schedules in patients with KRAS mutant tumors. Although target engagement was observed, the clinical efficacy was limited.

Sections du résumé

LESSONS LEARNED
Afatinib and selumetinib can be combined in continuous and intermittent dosing schedules, albeit at lower doses than approved for monotherapy. Maximum tolerated dose for continuous and intermittent schedules is afatinib 20 mg once daily and selumetinib 25 mg b.i.d. Because the anticancer activity was limited, further development of this combination is not recommended until better biomarkers for response and resistance are defined.
BACKGROUND
Antitumor effects of MEK inhibitors are limited in KRAS-mutated tumors because of feedback activation of upstream epidermal growth factor receptors, which reactivates the MAPK and the phosphoinositide 3-kinase-AKT pathway. Therefore, this phase I trial was initiated with the pan-HER inhibitor afatinib plus the MEK inhibitor selumetinib in patients with KRAS mutant, PIK3CA wild-type tumors.
METHODS
Afatinib and selumetinib were administered according to a 3+3 design in continuous and intermittent schedules. The primary objective was safety, and the secondary objective was clinical efficacy.
RESULTS
Twenty-six patients were enrolled with colorectal cancer (n = 19), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (n = 6), and pancreatic cancer (n = 1). Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in six patients, including grade 3 diarrhea, dehydration, decreased appetite, nausea, vomiting, and mucositis. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was 20 mg afatinib once daily (QD) and 25 mg selumetinib b.i.d. (21 days on/7 days off) for continuous afatinib dosing and for intermittent dosing with both drugs 5 days on/2 days off. Efficacy was limited with disease stabilization for 221 days in a patient with NSCLC as best response.
CONCLUSION
Afatinib and selumetinib can be combined in continuous and intermittent schedules in patients with KRAS mutant tumors. Although target engagement was observed, the clinical efficacy was limited.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33296125
doi: 10.1002/onco.13631
pmc: PMC8018304
doi:

Substances chimiques

AZD 6244 0
Benzimidazoles 0
KRAS protein, human 0
Protein Kinase Inhibitors 0
Afatinib 41UD74L59M
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) EC 3.6.5.2

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase I Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

290-e545

Informations de copyright

© AlphaMed Press; the data published online to support this summary are the property of the authors.

Références

JAMA. 2017 May 9;317(18):1844-1853
pubmed: 28492898
Cell Rep. 2014 Apr 10;7(1):86-93
pubmed: 24685132
Cell. 2017 Feb 23;168(5):817-829.e15
pubmed: 28215705
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2015 Jan;75(1):17-23
pubmed: 25322874
Nat Med. 2018 Jul;24(7):961-967
pubmed: 29808006
Br J Cancer. 2020 Apr;122(8):1166-1174
pubmed: 32147669
Nat Cell Biol. 2018 Sep;20(9):1064-1073
pubmed: 30104724
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2020 May;85(5):917-930
pubmed: 32274564
Cancer Cell. 2013 Jan 14;23(1):121-8
pubmed: 23245996
Ann Oncol. 2016 Nov;27(11):2103-2110
pubmed: 27601237

Auteurs

Emilie M J van Brummelen (EMJ)

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Sanne Huijberts (S)

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Carla van Herpen (C)

Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Ingrid Desar (I)

Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Frans Opdam (F)

Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Robin van Geel (R)

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Serena Marchetti (S)

Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Neeltje Steeghs (N)

Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Kim Monkhorst (K)

Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Bas Thijssen (B)

Department of Pharmacy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Hilde Rosing (H)

Department of Pharmacy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Alwin Huitema (A)

Department of Pharmacy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Jos Beijnen (J)

Department of Pharmacy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Rene Bernards (R)

Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Jan Schellens (J)

Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH