Derivation of algal acute to chronic ratios for use in chemical toxicity extrapolations.

Algal toxicity studies are required by regulatory agencies for a variety of purposes including classification and labeling and environmental risk assessment of chemicals. Algae are also frequently the most sensitive taxonomic group tested. Acute to chronic ratios (ACRs) have been challenging to derive for algal species because of the complexities of the underlying experimental data including: a lack of universally agreed upon algal inhibition endpoints; evolution of experimental designs over time and by different standardization authorities; and differing statistical approaches (e.g., regression versus hypothesis-based effect concentrations). Experimental data for developing globally accepted algal ACRs have been limited because of data availability, and in most regulatory frameworks an ACR of 10 is used regardless of species, chemical type or mode of action. Acute and chronic toxicity (inhibition) data on 17 algal species and 442 chemicals were compiled from the EnviroTox database (https://envirotoxdatabase.org/) and a proprietary database of algal toxicity records. Information was probed for growth rate, yield, and final cell density endpoints focusing primarily on studies of 72 and 96 h duration. Comparisons of acute and chronic data based on either single (e.g., growth rate) and multiple (e.g., growth rate, final cell density) endpoints were used to assess acute and chronic relationships. Linear regressions of various model permutations were used to compute ACRs for multiple combinations of taxa, chemicals, and endpoints, and showed that ACRs for algae were consistently around 4 (ranging from 2.43 to 5.62). An ACR of 4 for algal toxicity is proposed as an alternative to a default value of 10, and recommendations for consideration and additional research and development are provided.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.