Contact Tracing: A Memory Task With Consequences for Public Health.
COVID-19
SARS CoV2
contact tracing
memory
witness interviewing
Journal
Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
ISSN: 1745-6924
Titre abrégé: Perspect Psychol Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101274347
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2021
01 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
11
12
2020
medline:
29
1
2021
entrez:
10
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In the battle for control of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), we have few weapons. Yet contact tracing is among the most powerful. Contact tracing is the process by which public-health officials identify people, or contacts, who have been exposed to a person infected with a pathogen or another hazard. For all its power, though, contact tracing yields a variable level of success. One reason is that contact tracing's ability to break the chain of transmission is only as effective as the proportion of contacts who are actually traced. In part, this proportion turns on the quality of the information that infected people provide, which makes human memory a crucial part of the efficacy of contact tracing. Yet the fallibilities of memory, and the challenges associated with gathering reliable information from memory, have been grossly underestimated by those charged with gathering it. We review the research on witnesses and investigative interviewing, identifying interrelated challenges that parallel those in contact tracing, as well as approaches for addressing those challenges.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33301692
doi: 10.1177/1745691620978205
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM