Linkage of primary care prescribing records and pharmacy dispensing Records in the Salford Lung Study: application in asthma.


Journal

BMC medical research methodology
ISSN: 1471-2288
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Res Methodol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968545

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 12 2020
Historique:
received: 04 11 2019
accepted: 30 11 2020
entrez: 11 12 2020
pubmed: 12 12 2020
medline: 25 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Records of medication prescriptions can be used in conjunction with pharmacy dispensing records to investigate the incidence of adherence, which is defined as observing the treatment plans agreed between a patient and their clinician. Using prescribing records alone fails to identify primary non-adherence; medications not being collected from the dispensary. Using dispensing records alone means that cases of conditions that resolve and/or treatments that are discontinued will be unaccounted for. While using a linked prescribing and dispensing dataset to measure medication non-adherence is optimal, this linkage is not routinely conducted. Furthermore, without a unique common event identifier, linkage between these two datasets is not straightforward. We undertook a secondary analysis of the Salford Lung Study dataset. A novel probabilistic record linkage methodology was developed matching asthma medication pharmacy dispensing records and primary care prescribing records, using semantic (meaning) and syntactic (structure) harmonization, domain knowledge integration, and natural language feature extraction. Cox survival analysis was conducted to assess factors associated with the time to medication dispensing after the prescription was written. Finally, we used a simplified record linkage algorithm in which only identical records were matched, for a naïve benchmarking to compare against the results of our proposed methodology. We matched 83% of pharmacy dispensing records to primary care prescribing records. Missing data were prevalent in the dispensing records which were not matched - approximately 60% for both medication strength and quantity. A naïve benchmarking approach, requiring perfect matching, identified one-quarter as many matching prescribing records as our methodology. Factors associated with delay (or failure) to collect the prescribed medication from a pharmacy included season, quantity of medication prescribed, previous dispensing history and class of medication. Our findings indicate that over 30% of prescriptions issued were not collected from a dispensary (primary non-adherence). We have developed a probabilistic record linkage methodology matching a large percentage of pharmacy dispensing records with primary care prescribing records for asthma medications. This will allow researchers to link datasets in order to extract information about asthma medication non-adherence.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Records of medication prescriptions can be used in conjunction with pharmacy dispensing records to investigate the incidence of adherence, which is defined as observing the treatment plans agreed between a patient and their clinician. Using prescribing records alone fails to identify primary non-adherence; medications not being collected from the dispensary. Using dispensing records alone means that cases of conditions that resolve and/or treatments that are discontinued will be unaccounted for. While using a linked prescribing and dispensing dataset to measure medication non-adherence is optimal, this linkage is not routinely conducted. Furthermore, without a unique common event identifier, linkage between these two datasets is not straightforward.
METHODS
We undertook a secondary analysis of the Salford Lung Study dataset. A novel probabilistic record linkage methodology was developed matching asthma medication pharmacy dispensing records and primary care prescribing records, using semantic (meaning) and syntactic (structure) harmonization, domain knowledge integration, and natural language feature extraction. Cox survival analysis was conducted to assess factors associated with the time to medication dispensing after the prescription was written. Finally, we used a simplified record linkage algorithm in which only identical records were matched, for a naïve benchmarking to compare against the results of our proposed methodology.
RESULTS
We matched 83% of pharmacy dispensing records to primary care prescribing records. Missing data were prevalent in the dispensing records which were not matched - approximately 60% for both medication strength and quantity. A naïve benchmarking approach, requiring perfect matching, identified one-quarter as many matching prescribing records as our methodology. Factors associated with delay (or failure) to collect the prescribed medication from a pharmacy included season, quantity of medication prescribed, previous dispensing history and class of medication. Our findings indicate that over 30% of prescriptions issued were not collected from a dispensary (primary non-adherence).
CONCLUSIONS
We have developed a probabilistic record linkage methodology matching a large percentage of pharmacy dispensing records with primary care prescribing records for asthma medications. This will allow researchers to link datasets in order to extract information about asthma medication non-adherence.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33302885
doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01184-8
pii: 10.1186/s12874-020-01184-8
pmc: PMC7731758
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

303

Références

Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2016 Mar 07;5:19-25
pubmed: 29354535
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 10;8(7):e020980
pubmed: 29991628
Int J Clin Pract. 2019 Jun;73(6):e13350
pubmed: 30941854
Am J Manag Care. 2012 Aug;18(8):426-34
pubmed: 22928758
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 13;3:CD012286
pubmed: 28288272
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 29;9(1):e024355
pubmed: 30700480
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jan;73(1):91-97
pubmed: 27695918
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 21;8(1):e016982
pubmed: 29358417
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Jun 01;163:24-30
pubmed: 27068252
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Jul-Aug;40(7-8):1280-88
pubmed: 16868217
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2012 May-Jun;52(3):381-97
pubmed: 22618980
Thorax. 2014 Dec;69(12):1152-4
pubmed: 24603195
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Mar 22;20(1):21371
pubmed: 28630651
AIDS Behav. 2013 Jan;17(1):284-97
pubmed: 22407465
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Oct 1;46(5):1699-1710
pubmed: 29025131
Pragmat Obs Res. 2017 Sep 20;8:175-181
pubmed: 29033625
Health Serv Res. 2009 Oct;44(5 Pt 1):1640-61
pubmed: 19500161
Appl Clin Inform. 2012 Oct 17;3(4):377-91
pubmed: 23646085
Drugs Aging. 2015 Mar;32(3):217-25
pubmed: 25749743
Lancet. 2017 Nov 18;390(10109):2247-2255
pubmed: 28903864
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jul 1;40(25):2070-2085
pubmed: 29992264
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 15;7(9):e015108
pubmed: 28918407
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;34(1):91-99
pubmed: 30219957
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jun;70(6):757-63
pubmed: 24756147
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2009 Jun;2(4):174-80
pubmed: 25126289
Respir Res. 2015 Sep 04;16:101
pubmed: 26337978
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Apr;25(4):284-90
pubmed: 20131023
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 06;12(10):e1001885
pubmed: 26440803
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Nov;120(5):1153-9
pubmed: 17936894
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006 Aug;15(8):565-74; discussion 575-7
pubmed: 16514590
Clin Epidemiol. 2012;4:13-8
pubmed: 22291479
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jul 6;18(1):76
pubmed: 29980173
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2018 Jan 10;3(1):410
pubmed: 30533534
BMC Pulm Med. 2015 Dec 10;15:160
pubmed: 26651333
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2015 Oct;40(5):590-593
pubmed: 26291693
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Sep;70(3):335-41
pubmed: 20716231
J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Mar 1;40(1):191-198
pubmed: 28369581
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Oct 1;25(10):1322-1330
pubmed: 30113681
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006 Apr 03;6:18
pubmed: 16584557
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Feb;12(2):161-6
pubmed: 25569765
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Jan;24(1):67-74
pubmed: 25331490
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Nov;20(11):1177-83
pubmed: 21858899
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jan;28(1):111-9
pubmed: 22077107

Auteurs

Holly Tibble (H)

Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Bioquarter 9, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH16 4UX. Holly.tibble@ed.ac.uk.
Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Bioquarter 9, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH16 4UX. Holly.tibble@ed.ac.uk.

James Lay-Flurrie (J)

GlaxoSmithKline UK Ltd, Brentford, UK.

Aziz Sheikh (A)

Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Bioquarter 9, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH16 4UX.
Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Bioquarter 9, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH16 4UX.
Health Data Research U004B, Edinburgh, UK.

Rob Horne (R)

Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Bioquarter 9, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH16 4UX.
Centre for Behavioural Medicine, UCL School of Pharmacy, London, UK.

Mehrdad A Mizani (MA)

Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Bioquarter 9, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH16 4UX.
Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Bioquarter 9, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH16 4UX.

Athanasios Tsanas (A)

Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Bioquarter 9, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH16 4UX.
Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Bioquarter 9, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH16 4UX.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH