Impact of State-Level Reproductive Health Legislation on Access to and Use of Reproductive Health Services and Reproductive Health Outcomes: A Systematic Scoping Review in the Affordable Care Act Era.


Journal

Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
ISSN: 1878-4321
Titre abrégé: Womens Health Issues
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9101000

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
received: 13 04 2020
revised: 13 10 2020
accepted: 05 11 2020
pubmed: 12 12 2020
medline: 20 4 2021
entrez: 11 12 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We systematically reviewed the literature to understand the associations between state-level reproductive health policies and reproductive health care outcomes and describe policy impacts on reproductive health outcomes among women aged 18 and older. We focused on research conducted after the implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to understand the influence of state-level policies in the context of existing federal policy. Standard search terms were used to search PubMed for studies published between March 10, 2010, and August 31, 2019. Studies were included that reflected original U.S.-based research testing associations between state-level policies (i.e., laws related to family planning, maternity care, and abortion) and reproductive health outcomes related to those services (e.g., prenatal care use) among adults. Reference lists of systematic reviews were searched to improve the identification of relevant studies. Studies were excluded if they were reviews, qualitative or mixed-methods studies, or descriptive studies, or if a state was not the unit of analysis. After dual review, agreement on inclusion of studies was 100%. Search results returned 1,529 articles; 56 (3.59%) met the inclusion criteria for a full review based on title and abstract review. After dual independent review, eight were selected for inclusion. Two included all 50 states and Washington, DC; one included Oregon and Washington; and the remaining studies included single states (Texas, Arizona, Ohio, and Utah). One-half of the studies (n = 4) focused solely on restrictive abortion legislation. Restricting access to family planning and abortion services (e.g., mandatory waiting periods) were associated with negative outcomes (e.g., additional interventions for medication abortion). Expanding maternity care through Medicaid reform and autonomous midwifery laws were associated with positive outcomes (e.g., prenatal care use). Our review identified eight studies that were largely focused on only one key aspect of reproductive health policy. Findings suggest that state-level legislation could have considerable impact on the reproductive health care that women have access to and receive, as well as the related outcomes. Research in this area remains limited. Rigorous evaluations of the relationship between the breadth of reproductive health policies and related health outcomes are needed, as is an exploration of barriers to the conduct of this type of research.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33303355
pii: S1049-3867(20)30126-2
doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2020.11.005
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

114-121

Subventions

Organisme : AHRQ HHS
ID : T32 HS013853
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Andrew S Bossick (AS)

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, Washington; Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: abossick@uw.edu.

Jennifer Brown (J)

Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Ami Hanna (A)

Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Canada Parrish (C)

Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Emily C Williams (EC)

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, Washington; Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Jodie G Katon (JG)

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, Washington; Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH